Case law

Application of Bernhard W. A. Weber and Hugh D. McLeese

341 F.2d 143 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Feb 18, 1965

The examiner considered the claims obvious over the prior art, holding them unpatentable over Brown in view of Will-cox or Huber. … The decision of the Board of Appeals is affirmed. Affirmed.

In re Herthel

156 F.2d 170 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jun 11, 1946

There were no claims allowed and appellant petitioned the board requesting a reconsideration of its decision. … Claims 1, 2, and 3 were rejected by the examiner on the ground that they were “unpatentable over Nelson or Wagner in view of Brown, Penniman, Pew (1,935,953) or Werner.”

Malone v. Gober

10 Vet. App. 539 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Dec 2, 1997

See Cotton v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 325, 327 (1995); Hayes, supra; see also H.R.Rep. … Brown, 7 Vet.App. 184 (1994) ( 38 C.F.R. § 3.109 (a)); Willis v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 433, 435 (1994) ( 38 C.F.R. § 13.59 (a)).

Taylor v. West

11 Vet. App. 436 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Sep 25, 1998

See Lyman v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 194, 196-97 (1993). … Moffitt v. Brown, 10 Vet.App. 214, 225 (1997).

Thomas P. Chotta v. Eric K. Shinseki

23 Vet. App. 73 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jun 5, 2009

See Owens v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 429, 433 (1995). … See Locher v. Brown, 9 Vet.App. 535, 537 (1996).

Best Moulding Corp. v. United States

51 C.C.P.A. 7 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Dec 12, 1963

Referring to United States v. Myers & Co. et al., 28 Treas. Dec. 318 , T.D. 35179 and W. E. Ellis v. United States, 30 Treas. … Under the decision in United States v. Myers (T.D. 35179), it is entitled to free entry, as claimed.

Jarvis v. West

12 Vet. App. 559 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Sep 10, 1999

See Grivois v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 136, 138 (1994) (issues or claims not pressed on appeal are deemed abandoned); Bucklinger v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 435, 436 (1993). Accordingly, that decision is final and unreviewable. … See Phillips v. Brown, 10 Vet.App. 25, 30 (1997) (“[A] court has jurisdiction to determine whether it has jurisdiction over a particular matter”).

Larry D. Edwards v. Denis McDonough

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Mar 20, 2023

Shulkin, 29 Vet.App. 131, 137 (2017); see Brown v. Gardner, 513 U.S. 115, 120 (1994). … See Gabrielson v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 36, 40 (1994). Accordingly, the Court concludes that the Board clearly erred in relying on the November 2019 VA opinion to deny the veteran's claim. See Ardison v.

Oregon Brass Works v. War Contracts Price Adjustment Board

16 T.C. 1145 · United States Tax Court · May 23, 1951

See Harney, et al. v. Land, 14 T. C. 666 , and Buck, v. W. C. P. A. B., 10 T. C. 623 . … Knight Aeuen, Price Adjustment Board.

Versar, Inc.

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Sep 24, 2019

Frost Brown Todd LLC Columbus, OH APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Michael P. Goodman, Esq. … ofVersar, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter.

Harth v. West

14 Vet. App. 1 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jul 19, 2000

Cohen (Douglas) v. Brown, 10 Vet.App. 128, 137 (1997); see also Gaines v. West, 11 Vet. App. 353, 357 (1998) (citing Cohen (Douglas)). … See Allday v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 517, 533-34 (1995). On remand, the appellant will be free to submit additional evidence and argument on the remanded claim in accordance with Kutscherousky v.

Brown v. Commissioner

67 T.C.M. 3113 · United States Tax Court · Jun 20, 1994

DARRYL CRAIG BROWN, A.K.A. JOHN D. RODEN, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Brown v. Commissioner Docket No. 13817-92 United States Tax Court T.C. Memo 1994-282 ; 1994 Tax Ct. … Co. v.

Jose v. Kuppamala v. Robert A. McDonald

27 Vet. App. 447 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Dec 30, 2015

In Floyd v. Brown, the Board sua sponte granted the appellant a 10% extraschedular evaluation. 9 Vet.App. at 94. … Brown, 7 Vet.App. 517, 527 (1995); Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 49, 56-57 (1990).

Weierbach v. West

12 Vet. App. 486 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jul 14, 1999

See Chandler v. Gober, 11 Vet.App. 6, 8 (1997); Lematta v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 504, 507 (1996). Furthermore, the veteran has the burden of demonstrating prevailing party status to the Court. … Bowyer v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 549, 552 (1995).

Brown v. Commissioner

40 T.C.M. 725 · United States Tax Court · Jul 22, 1980

BROWN AND JOAN C. BROWN, ET AL, 1 Petitioners, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Brown v. Commissioner Docket Nos. 10262-76, 10263-76, 10264-76, 10265-76, 10266-76, 10267-76, 10268-76. … Kingbay v.

Thomas G. Joyce v. R. James Nicholson

19 Vet. App. 36 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Mar 22, 2005

See Crippen v. Brown, 9 Vet.App. 412, 418 (1996); see also Fugo v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 40, 44 (1993). In Russell v. … See Beyrle v. Brown, 9 Vet.App. 377, 382 (1996); see also Russell, 3 Vet.App. at 315 ; Eddy v. Brown, 9 Vet.App. 52, 57 (1996). In Kent v.

12-21 767

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Dec 31, 2015

App. 268 (1998) where Board's remand instructions were substantially complied with); Sabonis v. Brown, 6 Vet. … The Board concludes, therefore, that a decision on the merits at this time does not violate the VCAA, nor prejudice the appellant under Bernard v. Brown, 4 Vet. App. 384 (1993).

In re Brown

477 F.2d 946 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 17, 1973

Clearly, the examiner and the board accepted that criterion, and we do also. … Kalman, “A New Approach to Linear Filtering and Prediction Problems,” ASME Trans., J. of Basic Engr., *949 V. 82, pp. 35-45, Mar. 1960; and R. E. Kalman and R. S.

Narron v. West

13 Vet. App. 223 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Dec 9, 1999

R. at 5 (citing Latham v. Brown, 4 Vet.App. 265 (1993)). … Brown, 7 Vet.App. 398, 409-10 (1995) (citing Bernard v.

Donley-Kirlin Joint Venture

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Aug 2, 2019

Brown, Esq. … ofDonley-Kirlin Joint Venture, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter.