Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.46s
Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Sep 1, 2022
Brown, Esq. Douglas L. Patin, Esq. … of Koman Construction, LLC, rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDenver Sizemore v. Anthony J. Principi
18 Vet. App. 264 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Sep 3, 2004
Moreau v. Brown, 9 Vet.App. 389, 396 8 (1996). … Suozzi v. Brown, 10 Vet.App. 307, 311 (1997); see also Pentecost v.
Cited 11 timesPublished11 Vet. App. 245 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jun 15, 1998
. § 7252 (a) and pursuant to a final Board decision” (citing Matter of Wick, 40 F.3d 367, 370-73 (Fed.Cir.(1994)))); see also Horowitz v. … See Holland v. Gober, 10 Vet.App. 433, 435-36 (1997) (per curiam order) (citing Hamilton v. Brown, 4 Vet.App. 528, 538 (1993) (en banc), aff'd, 39 F.3d 1574 (Fed.Cir.1994)); see also Barrera v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedApplication of Herman Hoeksema
399 F.2d 269 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Aug 8, 1968
DuPont de Ne-mours & Co. v. … In Phillips Petroleum Co. v.
Cited 20 timesPublishedArmed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Oct 4, 2021
Brown & Ruprecht PC Kansas City, MO Wade Purcell, Esq. … that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 62615, Appeal of CBRE Heery, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.
Cited 0 timesPublished27 Vet. App. 497 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Mar 1, 2016
See Drosky v. Brown, 10 Vet.App. 251, 255 (1997) (holding that the Board’s imposition of additional requirements “other than those specified” in the diagnostic code was impermissible); Pernorio v. … (citing Ozer v. Principi, 14 Vet.App. 257, 264 (2001); Davenport v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 476, 482 (1995))); Black, 11 Vet.App. at 17 .
Cited 7 timesPublishedArmed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Apr 30, 2026
Mayer Brown LLP Washington, DC APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Steven M. Sosko, Esq. … Ebrex Sarl, rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.
Cited 0 timesPublished12 Vet. App. 491 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jul 27, 1999
Thurba [sic] v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 93 [sic] (1993). Suppl. R. at 1. … Brown, 8 Vet.App. 384, 390-91 (1995) (en banc); Yabut v.
Cited 6 timesPublished16 Vet. App. 551 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jan 24, 2003
See Massey v. Brown, 9 Vet.App. 134, 136 (1996) (per curiam order) (noting that Court will not address moot issue); see also Mokal v. … Brown, 7 Vet.App. 517, 533-34 (1995). On remand, the appellant will be free to submit additional evidence and argument on the remanded claim in accordance with Kutscherousky v.
Cited 1 timesPublished86 T.C.M. 347 · United States Tax Court · Sep 9, 2003
BROWN, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 8368-02L. Filed September 9, 2003. Jerry Arthur Jewett, for petitioner. Michelle M. … Brown, docket No. 8368-02L; Harold V. and Imogene N. Pahl, docket No. 11572-02L; Charles and Teresa Brodman, docket No. 16598-02L. - 7 - collection, and presented frivolous arguments.
Cited 2 timesUnpublishedFensterer & Ruhe v. United States
1 Ct. Cust. 93 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Nov 30, 1910
Therefore the decision of the Board of General Appraisers is reversed. We find also that the highest authority, the Supreme Court, in United States v. Downing ( 201 U. … Tiffany v.
Cited 39 timesPublishedRobert L. Howell v. R. James Nicholson
19 Vet. App. 535 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Mar 23, 2006
Cir. 2003)) (correct interpretation of a law or regulation is a question of law, which the Court reviews de novo); Cropper v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 450, 454 (1994). … See 38 U.S.C. § 1114(l); see also Gardner v. Brown, 5 F.3d 1456, 1456 (Fed.
Cited 7 timesPublishedBoard of Veterans' Appeals · Apr 26, 2018
The Board finds that the RO substantially complied with the remand instructions and that any lack of compliance was cured by the subsequent remand. See D'Aries v. Peake, 22 Vet. … Hensley v. Brown, 5 Vet. App. 155, 160 (1993). The threshold for normal hearing is from zero to 20 decibels, and higher threshold levels indicate some degree of hearing loss. Id. at 157.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedAECOM Management Services, Inc.
Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Apr 20, 2022
Army Chief Trial Attorney CPT Michael Brown, JA MAJ Seth Ritzman, JA … 62795, Appeals of AECOM Management Services, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.
Cited 0 timesPublished16 Vet. App. 208 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jul 30, 2002
Brown, 5 Vet.App. 229, 232 (1993); Wood v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 190, 192 (1991). … Bielby v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 260, 268-69 (1994).
Cited 15 timesPublishedArmed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Oct 25, 2022
Brown, Esq. Douglas L. Patin, Esq. Sabah K. Petrov, Esq. … 62090, Appeals of Assist Consultants Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.
Cited 0 timesPublishedIn re Nat'l Prescription Opiate Litig.
290 F. Supp. 3d 1375 · United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · Dec 5, 2017
No. 2:17-00663 BROWN COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS v. AMERISOURCEBERGEN DRUG CORPORATION, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17-00664 VINTON COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS v. AMERISOURCEBERGEN CORPORATION, ET AL., C.A. … No. 2:17-02296 THE COUNTY COMMISSION OF LINCOLN COUNTY v. WEST VIRGINIA BOARD OF PHARMACY, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17-03366 LIVINGGOOD v. WEST VIRGINIA BOARD OF PHARMACY, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17-03369 SPARKS v.
Cited 19 timesPublishedHoel-Steffen Construction Co. v. United States
456 F.2d 760 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 17, 1972
See Morrison-Knudsen Co. v. United States, 170 Ct. Cl. 757 , 345 F. 2d 833 (1985); L. W. Foster Sportswear Co. v. United States, 186 Ct. Cl. 499 , 405 F. 2d 1285 (1969); La Crosse Garment Mfg. Co. v. … The Board’s finding to this effect Is also strongly supported by other substantial evidence. The company’s witnesses did not cite Mr. Brown as personally giving any directives or orders as to priority.
Cited 44 timesPublishedConstance Copeland v. Eric K. Shinseki
26 Vet. App. 86 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Nov 14, 2012
Brown, 6 Vet.App. 405, 407 (1994))). *89 III. ANALYSIS A. … Based on the record of proceedings, the Board’s finding is plausible and not clearly erroneous. See Gilbert v.
Cited 8 timesPublished10 Vet. App. 539 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Dec 2, 1997
See Cotton v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 325, 327 (1995); Hayes, supra; see also H.R.Rep. … Brown, 7 Vet.App. 184 (1994) ( 38 C.F.R. § 3.109 (a)); Willis v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 433, 435 (1994) ( 38 C.F.R. § 13.59 (a)).
Cited 27 timesPublished
Ask Donna