Case law

A.R. Acosta Limited

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Jun 1, 2022

ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of -- ) ) A.R. … Army Chief Trial Attorney MAJ Seth Ritzman, JA CPT Michael Brown, JA

Miami Free Zone Corp. v. Foreign-Trade Zones Board

914 F. Supp. 620 · United States Court of International Trade · Jan 19, 1996

STANDARD OF REVIEW This Court set forth the standard of review applicable to decisions of the Board in Conoco, Inc. v. United States, 18 CIT -, -, 855 F.Supp. 1306, 1310-11 (1994) (Conoco III). See also Conoco, Inc. v. … June 9, 1995); Phibro Energy, Inc. v. Brown, 19 CIT -, -, 886 F.Supp. 863, 868 (1995) (same).

Simona Suguitan v. Robert A. McDonald

27 Vet. App. 114 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Oct 29, 2014

Ass'n v. Bowen, 485 U.S. 399, 403-05 (1988))), aff'd sub nom. Gardner v. Brown, 5 F.3d 1456 (Fed. Cir. 1993), aff'd, 513 U.S. 115 (1994). … If "the plain meaning of a statute is discernable, that 'plain meaning must be given effect,'" Johnson v. Brown, 9 Vet.App. 369, 371 (1996) (quoting Tallman v.

Earlee King v. Eric K. Shinseki

23 Vet. App. 464 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · May 28, 2010

Clemons v. Shinseki, 23 Vet.App. 1, 5 (2009); see Sondel v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 218, 220 (1994) (when issue is not reasonably raised, Board is not required to “conduct an exercise in prognostication”). In Mr. … See 38 U.S.C. § 7104 (d)(1); Allday v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 517, 527 (1995); Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 49, 57 (1990). Mr.

Jay A. Boyd v. Robert A. McDonald

27 Vet. App. 63 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Aug 5, 2014

Principi, 19 Vet.App. 11, 19 (2004); see Fluker v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 296, 298 (1993). … See Tyrues v.

Wandel v. West

11 Vet. App. 200 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Apr 7, 1998

See Thurber v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 119 (1993); Br. at 14-16. … Grottveit v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 91, 92 (1993).

Gilbane, SMCC ECC, LLC

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Jun 3, 2026

Brown, Esq. … rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Application of Wilfred Roland Soucy

378 F.2d 374 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Oct 5, 1967

Though cognizant of the fact that Browne’s spring means operates by flexure and not tensile force, the board agreed with the examiner, noting that * * * the Marks’ Handbook citation establishes that a metallic element when … The board, however, also felt the claimed subject matter to be obvious in view of Browne under 35 U.S.C. § 103 , stating: * * * In Browne, Figures 1 and 3, a spring 20 interlocks in a groove of the molded body, and completely

Werden v. West

13 Vet. App. 463 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · May 5, 2000

a matter for redetermination at . . . the Board"); see also Malone v. … Clearly, the Board has authority to secure an opinion from the General Counsel. See 38 C.F.R. § 20.901; Sabonis v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 426 (1994).

Pierre v. West

12 Vet. App. 92 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Dec 23, 1998

See also Still-well v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 291, 294 (1994); Bowyer v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 549, 550 (1995). … Dillon v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 165, 168 (1995); Bowyer, 7 Vet.App. at 553 ; Carpenito v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 534, 537 (1995).

Gahman v. West

13 Vet. App. 148 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Nov 5, 1999

Presumption of Soundness Once the Board reopened the appellant’s claim, it was required to address the presumption of soundness. See Routen v. Brown, 10 Vet.App. 183, 187 (1997); aff'd sub nom. Routen v. … Brown, 6 Vet.App. 465, 469 (1994). For example, on this record, there is no basis — let alone a plausible basis, see Gilbert v.

Fish v. United States

12 Ct. Cust. 307 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jun 28, 1924

sixty days next after the entry of such decree or judgment, and not afterwards, apply to the Court of Customs Appeals for a review of the questions of law and fact involved in such decision. * * * In Brown & Co. et al. v … In United States v.

Leh v. Commissioner

27 T.C. 892 · United States Tax Court · Mar 11, 1957

Commissioner v. Starr Brothers, Inc., 204 F. 2d 673, 674 (C. A. 2). We recognize that controversies in this field have resulted in. some rather fine distinctions. … Hand undertook in the McCue Bros. & Drummond case to distinguish the two lines of cases; in cases such as Starr Brothers, supra, and General Artists Corp. v. Commissioner, 205 F. 2d 360 (C.

Koman Construction, LLC

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Sep 1, 2022

Brown, Esq. Douglas L. Patin, Esq. … of Koman Construction, LLC, rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Calma v. West

12 Vet. App. 66 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Dec 2, 1998

Calma, appealed through counsel an August 25, 1994, decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board or BVA). … Brown, 7 Vet.App. 163, 169 (1994); Stillwell, 6 Vet.App. at 301 ... ”, the Court need not decide the issue. Shaw v. Gober, 10 Vet.App. 498, 501 (1997); see also Cook v.

Beck v. West

13 Vet. App. 535 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jun 27, 2000

Id.; Stringham v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 445, 448 (1995). The determination whether insanity existed at the relevant time is factual, and the Court reviews the Board's determination under the "clearly erroneous" standard. … Id. at __, slip op. at 13-14 (citing Robinette v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 69, 75-76 (1995)). Here, the Board in its March 1996 remand decision concluded that Mr. Beck's claim had been reopened based on Dr.

Henderson v. West

11 Vet. App. 245 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jun 15, 1998

. § 7252 (a) and pursuant to a final Board decision” (citing Matter of Wick, 40 F.3d 367, 370-73 (Fed.Cir.(1994)))); see also Horowitz v. … See Holland v. Gober, 10 Vet.App. 433, 435-36 (1997) (per curiam order) (citing Hamilton v. Brown, 4 Vet.App. 528, 538 (1993) (en banc), aff'd, 39 F.3d 1574 (Fed.Cir.1994)); see also Barrera v.

Valasco v. West

12 Vet. App. 172 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Feb 4, 1999

Jn Tablazón v. Brown, the RO never issued an SOC with respect to an original claim. 8 Vet.App. at 361 . … Brown, 5 Vet.App. 554 (1993); Rowell v.

Johnson v. McDonald

27 Vet. App. 497 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Mar 1, 2016

See Drosky v. Brown, 10 Vet.App. 251, 255 (1997) (holding that the Board’s imposition of additional requirements “other than those specified” in the diagnostic code was impermissible); Pernorio v. … (citing Ozer v. Principi, 14 Vet.App. 257, 264 (2001); Davenport v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 476, 482 (1995))); Black, 11 Vet.App. at 17 .

EFS Ebrex Sarl

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Apr 30, 2026

Mayer Brown LLP Washington, DC APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Steven M. Sosko, Esq. … Ebrex Sarl, rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.