Case law

Koechl v. United States

3 Ct. Cust. 316 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 31, 1912

down in Movius & Son v. … In Zinkheisen v. -United States (167 Ned.

Karen Gordon v. James B. Peake

22 Vet. App. 265 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Nov 21, 2008

See Locher v. Brown, 9 Vet.App. 535, 537 (1996). … Felton v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 276, 281 (1994) (quoting Ramon-Sepulveda v. INS, 863 F.2d 1458, 1459 (9th Cir.1988)).

SANCHEZ-HERBERT

26 I. & N. Dec. 43 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 2012

Martinez, Esquire, Boerne, Texas FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY: Justin Adams, Deputy Chief Counsel BEFORE: Board Panel: MALPHRUS and CREPPY, Board Members; LIEBOWITZ, Temporary Board Member. … See Matter of Brown, 18 I&N Dec. 324, 325 (BIA 1982).

Richard S. Brokowski v. Eric K. Shinseki

23 Vet. App. 79 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jun 8, 2009

See Evans v. West, 12 Vet.App. 396, 401 (1999); Hanson v. Brown, 9 Vet.App. 29, 32 (1996). … See Tablazon v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 359, 361 (1995); see also Juarez v.

Ryan v. West

13 Vet. App. 151 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Nov 15, 1999

See Davis v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 298, 303 (1994); Trammell v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 181, 182-83 (1994). On July 29, 1996, the veteran filed with this Court an NOA from the March 26, 1996, BVA decision. … Brown v. Gardner, 518 U.S. 115 , 118, 115 S.Ct. 552 , 180 L.Ed.2d 462 (1994); see generally Martin, Hughes Aircraft, and Landgraf , all supra.

Alva Jandreau v. Eric K. Shinseki

23 Vet. App. 12 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Apr 8, 2009

See Cullens, supra; Locher v. Brown, 9 Vet.App. 535, 537 (1996). … See Layno v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 465, 470 (1994).

Hradel v. Griffith

367 F.2d 851 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Nov 17, 1966

Rimbach v. … The board cited Seeley v. Rennick, 50 CCPA 1214, 314 F. 2d 577 , 137 USPQ 56 and Triplett v. Steinmuyer, 29 CCPA 1243, 129 F. 2d 869 , 54 USPQ 409 . We do not feel they are applicable in this case.

Thomas L. Bingham v. Anthony J. Principi

18 Vet. App. 470 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Aug 27, 2004

ANALYSIS A Board determination of the proper effective date is a finding of fact. See Hanson v. Brown, 9 Vet.App. 29, 32 (1996). … See Flash v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 332, 340 (1995) ("[W]hen a claim to reopen is successful and the benefit sought is awarded upon readjudication, the effective date is the date of the claim to reopen."); see also Sears v.

Simmons v. Gober

14 Vet. App. 84 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Aug 30, 2000

See Crippen v. Brown, 9 Vet.App. 412, 418 (1996); see also Fugo v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 40, 44 (1993). In Russell v. … See Eddy v. Brown, 9 Vet.App. 52, 57 (1996); Damrel, 6 Vet.App. at 246; Russell, 3 Vet.App. at 315.

Robert J. Ingram v. R. James Nicholson

21 Vet. App. 232 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · May 23, 2007

Brown, 6 Vet.App. 518, 519 (1994); (2) to mail a claimant a copy of the Board decision pursuant to 38 U.S.C.§ 7104(e), see Ashley v. … See Grantham v. Brown, 114 F.3d 1156, 1158 (Fed. Cir. 1997) ("It is axiomatic that the language in Hamilton[ v. Brown, 39 F.3d 1574, 1586 (Fed.

Vargas-Gonzalez v. Principi

15 Vet. App. 222 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Aug 16, 2001

See Hamilton v. Brown, 39 F.3d 1574, 1582 (Fed. Cir. 1994) (noting that, in 38 U.S.C. § 7105: "A notice of disagreement is discussed solely in the context of initiating an appeal to the Board. … Brown v. Gardner, 115 S.Ct. 552, 555 (1994); see also Forshey v. Gober, 226 F.3d 1299 (Fed. Cir. 2000); Allen v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 439 (1995) (en banc).

Bonhomme v. Nicholson

21 Vet. App. 40 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Feb 16, 2007

appeal “a final decision of the Board.”); see also Maggitt v. … Patterson v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 362, 364-65 (1993) (distinguishing decisions reviewing Board decisions from those reviewing the Chairman’s decision to deny reconsideration).

Irvin J. Edwards v. James B. Peake

22 Vet. App. 29 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jan 10, 2008

West, 12 Vet.App. 396, 401 (1999); Hanson v. Brown, 9 Vet.App. 29, 32 (1996). … The appellant cites to Bailey v. West, 160 F.3d 1360, 1365 (Fed. Cir. 1998) (en banc); Perry v. West, 12 Vet.App. 365, 368 (1999); Meeks v Brown, 5 Vet.App. 284, 287 (1993); Rosler v.

Helen Colem an v. R. Jam Es Nicholson

21 Vet. App. 386 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jul 24, 2007

See Locher v. Brown, 9 Vet.App. 535, 537 (1996). … See Dillon v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 165, 168 (1995); Bowyer v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 549, 553 (1995); Carpenito v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 534, 537 (1995).

Manning v. Principi

16 Vet. App. 534 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Dec 19, 2002

Morris v. West, 13 Vet.App. 94, 96 (1999), aff'd sub nom. Morris v. Principi, 239 F.3d 1292 (Fed.Cir.2001). In Brown v. … Brown, 203 F.3d at 1381-82 .

Willie E. Tatum v. Eric K. Shinseki

26 Vet. App. 443 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Feb 26, 2014

Johnson v. Brown, 9 Vet.App. 369, 371 (1996); see also Smith v. Brown, 35 F.3d 1516, 1523 (Fed. … MERRIAM-WEBSTER'S COLLEGIATE DICTIONARY 1223 (10th ed. 1999); see also Jones v. Brown, 41 F.3d 634, 638 (Fed.

Mason v. Principi

16 Vet. App. 129 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · May 24, 2002

When a claim lacks legal merit or entitlement under the law, the Court will affirm the Board's denial of that claim. See Sabonis v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 426, 430 (1994); see also Rivers v. … The Court is also satisfied that the Board's decision fulfills the "reasons or bases" requirement of 38 U.S.C. § 7104(d)(1). See Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 49, 56-57 (1990).

And Alfred R. Young v. Eric K. Shinseki

22 Vet. App. 461 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · May 11, 2009

See 38 U.S.C. § 7104 (d)(1); Allday v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 517, 527 (1995); Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 49, 56-57 (1990). … .”); Hauck v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 518, 519 (1994) (per curiam order); see also Cook v.

Cantrell v. Shulkin

28 Vet. App. 382 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Apr 18, 2017

Caluza v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 498, 506 (1995), aff'd per curiam, 78 F.3d 604 (Fed. Cir. 1996) (table). 1. The Parties’ Arguments Mr. … Nicholson, 20 Vet.App. 317, 320 (2006) (quoting Brown v. Gardner, 513 U.S. 115, 120 , 115 S.Ct. 552 , 130 L.Ed.2d 462 (1994)); see Pacheco v. Gibson, 27 Vet.App. 21, 25 (2014) (en banc).

Luyster v. Gober

14 Vet. App. 186 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Nov 20, 2000

Kutscherousky v. West, 12 Vet.App. 369, 372 (1999). The Board shall proceed expeditiously. See Veterans' Benefits Improvement Act, Pub. L. … . § 5101 note) (requiring Secretary to provide for "expeditious treatment" of claims remanded by Board or Court); Drosky v. Brown, 10 Vet.App. 251, 257 (1997).