Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersFS

10,000+ results

1.28s

  • American Legion v. Nicholson

    21 Vet. App. 1 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jan 5, 2007

    Nicholson, 20 Vet.App. 326, 331 (2006) (en banc); Bernard v. Brown, 4 Vet.App. 384, 390-91 (1993). … Hanson v. Brown, 9 Vet.App. 29, 32 (1996). Hence, without a potential beneficiary, there is nothing to pursue.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Louis J. Stern v. Denis McDonough

    United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Apr 20, 2021

    the analysis required by Brown v. … Marciniak v. Brown, 10 Vet.App. 198, 201 (1997) (holding that remand is unnecessary in the absence of demonstrated prejudice).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • R Oque A. a Costa v. Anthony J. Principi

    18 Vet. App. 53 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · May 14, 2004

    Brown, 10 Vet.App. 93, 97 (1997); Gilbert, 1 Vet.App. at 49. The Board is required to review and adjudicate all issues reasonably raised before it. See Suttmann v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 127, 132 (1993). … See 38 U.S.C. § 7261(a)(1); Buckley v. West, 12 Vet.App. 76, 82 (1998) (quoting Beyrle v. Brown, 9 Vet.App. 24, 27-28 (1996)).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Mauerhan v. Principi

    16 Vet. App. 436 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Oct 30, 2002

    Brown, 10 Vet.App. 258, 259 (1997) (per curiam order); Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 49, 52-53 (1990). … This construction is not inconsistent with Cohen v. Brown, 10 Vet.App. 128 (1997).

    Cited 271 timesPublished
  • Pamela J. Sharp v. Eric K. Shinseki

    23 Vet. App. 267 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Oct 15, 2009

    See Sharp v. Nicholson, 403 F.3d 1324 (Fed. Cir. 2005). The Court then remanded the matter to the Board, see Sharp v. … Brown v. Gardner, 513 U.S. 115, 118 (1994).

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • Dingess - Hartman v. Nicholson

    19 Vet. App. 473 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Mar 3, 2006

    . § 7104 (d)(1); Allday v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 517, 527 (1995); Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 49, 56-57 (1990). … Brown, 9 Vet.App. 88, 96 (1996); see EF v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 324, 326 (1991); Myers v.

    Cited 727 timesPublished
  • Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc.

    Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Mar 13, 2014

    ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of-- ) ) Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. ) ASBCA No. 58984 … of Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bernadine Acevedo v. Eric K. Shinseki

    25 Vet. App. 286 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jul 9, 2012

    Brown, 6 Vet.App. 405, 407 (1994))); Stefl v. … See 38 U.S.C. § 7104(d)(1); Allday v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 517, 527 (1995); Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 49, 56-57 (1990). III.

    Cited 44 timesPublished
  • Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc.

    Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Jul 18, 2014

    ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of -- ) ) Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. ) ASBCA No. 58578 … Appeals I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 58578, Appeal of Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc., rendered in conformance

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Pearlman v. West

    11 Vet. App. 443 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Oct 7, 1998

    See Caluza v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 498, 506 (1995), aff'd per curiam, 78 F.3d 604 (Fed.Cir.1996) (table); Epps v. Brown, 9 Vet.App. 341 (1996), aff'd sub nom. Epps v. … King v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 19, 21 (1993).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • In re Fee Agreement of Carpenter

    13 Vet. App. 382 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Mar 13, 2000

    See Fee Agreement of Leventhal, supra; Isenbart v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 537, 540 (1995); Parker v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 116, 118-19 (1994); Holland v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 443, 446-47 (1994). … Smallwood v. Brown, 10 Vet.App. 93, 100 (1997) (holding that a claim pending before VA is not ripe for review by this Court).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Miguel A. Camacho v. R. James Nicholson

    21 Vet. App. 360 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jul 6, 2007

    . §§ 831.902 and 842.802 must be demonstrated); Heuer v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 379, 385 (1995) (holding that criteria expressed in the conjunctive are connected by “and”); Malone v. … See Johnson v. Brown, 9 Vet.

    Cited 38 timesPublished
  • Janssen v. Principi

    15 Vet. App. 370 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Dec 27, 2001

    Brown, 7 Vet.App. 517, 533 (1995)); see also Velez v. West, 11 Vet.App. 148, 155 (1998). … See Johnston v. Brown, 10 Vet.App. 80, 84 (1997). The Court may not reject the Board's conclusion if it is supported by a plausible basis in the record. See Sanders v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 88, 90 (1990); Gilbert v.

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • Allen - Key v. Nicholson

    21 Vet. App. 54 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Mar 16, 2007

    Fugo v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 40, 43-44 (1993). … Dacoron v. Brown, 4 Vet.App. 115, 120 (1993); see also Duro v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • 03-09 166

    Board of Veterans' Appeals · Jul 31, 2014

    Allen v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 439, 448 (1995) (en banc). … Caluza v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 498 (1995).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Celerina Pelea v. R. James Nicholson

    20 Vet. App. 93 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jun 5, 2006

    ORDER PER CURIAM: On August 5, 2005, the Court issued its opinion in the instant appeal of a May 2, 2001, decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board). See Pelea v. Nicholson, 19 Vet.App. 296 (2005). … See also Zevalkink v. Brown, 102 F.3d 1236, 1243-44 (Fed.Cir.1996) (expressly agreeing with this Court’s Landicho holding); Morton v. Gober, 14 Vet.App. 174 (2000) (per curiam order).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Application of James M. Denny and Sven A. Carlsson

    397 F.2d 1020 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jun 27, 1968

    The examiner and board agreed that it would be obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103 to change the design of the studs in Brown’s structure to be like those of Schwartz. Appellants do not dispute this aspect of the rejection. … The drawing in the Brown patent is unclear.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Gary D. Bradley v. James B. Peake

    22 Vet. App. 280 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Nov 26, 2008

    Brown, 6 Vet.App. 405, 407 (1994) (noting that "an inadequate record frustrates judicial review"); see also Fla. Power & Light Co. v. … See Gardner v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 584, 587 (1991), aff'd sub nom. Gardner v. Brown, 5 F.3d 1456 (Fed. Cir. 1993), aff'd, 513 U.S. 115 (1994).

    Cited 101 timesPublished
  • Washington State Liquor Control Board v. United States

    19 Cust. Ct. 21 · United States Customs Court · Aug 8, 1947

    In the case of United States v. Somerset Importers, Ltd., 33 C. C. P. A. 138, C. A.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Washington State Liquor Control Board v. United States

    5 Cust. Ct. 149 · United States Customs Court · Oct 24, 1940

    The principle decided in Bill Co. v. … Warren Corp. v. United States, 25 C. C. P. A. 450, T. D. 49533.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.