Case law

Cycholl v. Principi

15 Vet. App. 355 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Dec 19, 2001

Gober, 14 Vet.App. 65, 70 (2000); Stillwell v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 291, 301 (1994). … See Locher v. Brown, 9 Vet.App. 535, 537 (1996).

Brown Boveri Corp. v. United States

45 Cust. Ct. 385 · United States Customs Court · Nov 30, 1960

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of voltage regulators similar in all material respects to those the subject of Brown Boveri Corp. et al. v. United States ( 40 Cust.

In re the Fee Agreement of Stanley

10 Vet. App. 104 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Feb 25, 1997

Brown, 9 Vet.App. 369, 371 (1996); Winn v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 510 (1996); Gardner v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 584 (1991), aff'd sub nom. Gardner v. … West v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 329 (1995) (en banc).

Winsett v. West

11 Vet. App. 420 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Sep 21, 1998

Brown, 5 Vet.App. 119, 123 (1993); Colvin v. Derwinski 1 Vet.App. 171, 174 (1991). … Owens v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 429, 433 (1995).

Brown Boveri Corp. v. United States

44 Cust. Ct. 303 · United States Customs Court · Jan 5, 1960

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of voltage regulators and parts thereof similar in all material respects to those the subject of Brown Boveri Corp. et al. v.

Brown Boveri Corp. v. United States

44 Cust. Ct. 303 · United States Customs Court · Jan 5, 1960

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of voltage regulators similar in all material respects to those the subject of Brown Boveri Corp. et at v. United States ( 40 Cust.

Brown Boveri Corp. v. United States

42 Cust. Ct. 338 · United States Customs Court · Mar 31, 1959

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of metal voltage regulators and parts thereof similar in all material respects to those the subject of Brown Boveri Corp. et al. v.

In re Swenson

132 F.2d 1020 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Dec 1, 1942

One claim rejected by the examiner was allowed by the board. … The board refused to affirm this rejection.

Effingham County Board of Education v. United States

9 Cl. Ct. 177 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 22, 1985

Two years prior to Foman , the Court in United States v. … And, consistent with this premise, we cite plaintiffs to the venerable old case of Friedman v.

Brown Boveri Corp. v. United States

52 Cust. Ct. 71 · United States Customs Court · Apr 2, 1964

Streuli, who was also a witness in the case of Brown Boveri Corp. and Gehrig Hoban & Co., Inc. v. United States, 40 Cust. … It would include conductors, instruments of all kinds, paneling boards made from steel or marble, a lot of equipment mounted tbereon and behind and interconnected.

08-03 156

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Aug 31, 2011

App. 141 (1999) (noting that a remand is not required under Stegall v. West, 11 Vet. App. 268 (1998) where the Board's remand instructions were substantially complied with), aff'd, Dyment v. … Francisco v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 55, 58 (1994).

Brown Boveri Corp. v. United States

48 Cust. Ct. 347 · United States Customs Court · Feb 21, 1962

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of voltage regulators and parts similar in all material respects to those the subject of Brown Boveri Corp. et al. v. United States ( 40 Cust.

In re Attwood

253 F.2d 234 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Mar 14, 1958

Claim 8 was rejected by the board as unpatentable over Brown in view of Chase. … The board rejected this claim as unpatentable over Brown in view of Chase, the German patent and Attwood. Again, we feel that the Attwood disclosure was not properly combined with the other cited references.

Halpern v. Principi

15 Vet. App. 416 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Feb 8, 2002

. § 2412 (d)(2)(F); see Stillwell v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 291 (1994). … See Kelsey v. West, 13 Vet.App. 437 (2000) (per curiam order); Henderson v. West, 12 Vet.App. 11, 14 (1998); Smith v. Brown, 10 Vet.App. 330, 332 (1997); Phillips v. Brown, 10 Vet.App. 25, 30 (1997); Aronson v.

Brown v. Comm'r

2013 T.C. Summary Opinion 21 · United States Tax Court · Mar 4, 2013

Summary Opinion 2013-21 UNITED STATES TAX COURT NICHOLAS MATTHEW BROWN AND REBEKAH BROWN, Petitioners v. … See Sanford v. Commissioner, 50 T.C. 823, 827- 828 (1968), aff’d per curiam, 412 F.2d 201 (2d Cir. 1969); Rasmussen v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2012-353.

Hug Co. v. War Contracts Price Adjustment Board

14 T.C. 621 · United States Tax Court · Apr 18, 1950

From the foregoing we think it is clear that Hug not only- controlled the petitioner’s board of directors, but that when they took action which he later desired to disregard he did so without referring the matter back to … Since Hug controlled the meetings of the petitioner’s stockholders, controlled petitioner’s board of directors, and controlled petitioner’s operations and assets to the extent here shown, we conclude that he was in actual

09-02 967

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Aug 13, 2018

See AB v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 35, 38 (1993). This case was previously before the Board in December 2013 and March 2016. The Board remanded the claims for further development. … Board"); Dickens v.

Brown v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 25, 2025

United States Court of Federal Claims No. 25-852 Filed: August 25, 2025 ) ANTONIO LETRELL BROWN … v.

Hill Brown Corp. v. United States

42 Cust. Ct. 310 · United States Customs Court · Mar 18, 1959

Saunders & Co., Inc. v. United States ( 37 Cust.

Juliet T. Tagupa v. Robert A. McDonald

27 Vet. App. 95 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Aug 26, 2014

Soria v. Brown, 118 F.3d 747, 749 (Fed.Cir.1997). … Sarmiento v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 80, 85 (1994), overruled on other grounds by D’Amico v. West, 209 F.3d 1322, 1327 (Fed.Cir.2000).