Case law

McLendon v. Nicholson

20 Vet. App. 79 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Aug 7, 2006

Brown, 5 Vet.App. 458, 461 (1993) (stating that the Board is not bound to accept a physician’s opinion when it is based exclusively on the recitations of a claimant that have been rejected by the Board); Swann v. … Brown, 8 Vet.App. 398, 405 (1995) (claimant competent to testify to visible injuries and pain); Espiritu v.

Kevin R. George v. Robert L. Wilkie

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jan 4, 2019

See Doran v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 283, 286 (1994) (holding that the presumption of soundness "can be overcome only by clear and unmistakable evidence that a disability existed prior to service"); Bagby v. … See Brown v.

Tester Corp. v. United States

30 Cont. Cas. Fed. 70,544 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 22, 1982

Tester Corp. v. United States, Ct.Cl. … In Rumley v.

Garcia-Gines v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 14, 2017

Prior to his discharge from the Army, plaintiff's medical condition was reviewed by a medical evaluation board (MEB) and by an informal physical evaluation board (PEB). … "The decision by the first statutorily authorized board which hears or refuses to hear the claim is the triggering event." Real v. United States, 906 F.2d at 1560.

Braden v. War Contracts Price Adjustment Board

11 T.C. 71 · United States Tax Court · Jul 21, 1948

Kenneth B. Mason v. Eric K. Shinseki

25 Vet. App. 83 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Oct 28, 2011

Washington v. Nicholson, 19 Vet.App. 362, 367-68 (2005); Owens v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 429, 433 (1995). In this case, Mr. … See Grivois v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 136, 138 (1994) (holding that issues or claims not argued on appeal are considered abandoned).

Holland v. Gober

10 Vet. App. 433 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Oct 8, 1997

Holland v. Brown, 9 Vet.App. 324, 331 (1996). … Holland v. Brown, 10 Vet.App. 42 (1997) (en banc).

Alberta Pork Producers' Marketing Board v. United States

683 F. Supp. 1398 · United States Court of International Trade · Mar 22, 1988

See USX Corp. v. … As our appellate court noted in Atlantic Sugar, Ltd. v. United States, 2 Fed.Cir.

Fenderson v. West

12 Vet. App. 119 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jan 20, 1999

Brown, 10 Vet.App. 93, 98 (1997); Arnesen v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 432, 439 (1995); Butts v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 532, 539 (1993) (en banc). … DeLuca v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 202, 207 (1995).

Dennis M. Thun v. James B. Peake

22 Vet. App. 111 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Apr 23, 2008

Allday v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 517, 527 (1995). … See Johnston v. Brown, 10 Vet.App. 80, 84 (1997); Cromley v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 376, 378 (1995); Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 49, 53 (1990). IV.

In re the Fee Agreement of Smith

10 Vet. App. 311 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jun 26, 1997

Lundgren v. Brown, U.S. Vet.App. No. 92-1072, 1994 WL 81572 (mem. dec. March 4, 1994) [hereinafter Lundgren II]. Citing Travelstead v. … The Board’s conclusion in the 1995 decision that there was no final Board decision is contrary to our decision in Lundgren II. See Means v. Brown, 9 Vet.App. 482, 483 (1996)(per curiam order). III.

Washington State Liquor Control Board v. United States

20 Cust. Ct. 173 · United States Customs Court · May 6, 1948

See United States v. Estate of Boshell, 14 Ct. Cust. Appls. 273 , T. D. 41884; also Diana v. United States, 12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 290 , T. D. 40295; Sterling Bronze Co. v. United States, idem 338, T. … Casazza & Bro. v. United States, 13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 627 , T. D. 41481; May Co. v. United States, 12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 266 , T. D. 40270. See also Hartranft v. Oliver, 125 U. S. 525 ; United States v.

Manlincon v. West

12 Vet. App. 238 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Mar 12, 1999

Cacalda v. Brown, 9 Vet.App. 261, 264 (1996); Dela Pena v. Derwinski, 2 Vet.App. 80 (1992). … See Archbold, 9 Vet.App. at 130 ; Hamilton v. Brown, 4 Vet.App. 528, 538 (1993) (en banc), aff'd, 39 F.3d 1574, 1582-85 (Fed.Cir.1994).

Forshey v. West

12 Vet. App. 71 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Dec 3, 1998

See Hanna v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 507, 510 (1994). … Brown, 6 Vet.App. 396, 401 (1994); see also Cohen v. Brown, 10 Vet.App. 128, 150 (1997); Buzinski v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 360, 365 (1994); Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 49, 53 (1990).

Frank E. Buczynski v. Eric K. Shinseki

24 Vet. App. 221 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jan 6, 2011

Hood v. Brown, 4 Vet.App. 301, 302-03 (1993); see Cox v. … Brown, 6 Vet.App. 405, 407 (1994)); Moore v.

North American Aviation, Inc. v. Renegotiation Board

36 T.C. 575 · United States Tax Court · Jun 27, 1961

Dianne C. Tatum v. Eric K. Shinseki

23 Vet. App. 152 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Sep 28, 2009

See, e.g., Pierce v. Principi, 18 Vet.App. 440, 445 (2004) (discussing § 4.7 in the context of an increased rating claim); Deluca v. Brown, 11 Vet.App. 202, 205 (1995) (same); Baker v. … Kitchens v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 320, 325 (1995); Brown v.

Hazan v. Gober

10 Vet. App. 511 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Nov 14, 1997

Brown, 7 Vet.App. 216, 223-24 (1994); Talbert v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 352, 355 (1995). … Fugo v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 40, 43-44 (1993). In Russell v.

List & Clark Constr. Co. v. Renegotiation Board

35 T.C. 823 · United States Tax Court · Feb 28, 1961

The minutes of the Eenegotiation Board show that on March 15, 1955, the Board denied the request of the petitioner for exemption of this prime contract, as modified. … To the extent the Board’s action related to this point we are without authority to review it. The cases cited by the petitioner, Vaughn Machinery Co. v. Renegotiation Board, 30 T.C. 949 , and Golbert v.

Grant v. War Contracts Price Adjustment Board

4 T.C. 1167 · United States Tax Court · Apr 20, 1945

The authority of the War Contracts Price Adjustment Board to renegotiate contracts and eliminate excessive profits is restricted to taxable years beginning after June 30, 1943. 1 That Board did not make the determination … The Court has provided in Rule 64 that the War Contracts Price Adjustment Board shall be shown as respondent in proceedings where the determination has been made by that Board, while in other proceedings where the determination