Case law

Grumman Aircraft Engineering Corp. v. Renegotiation Board

52 T.C. 152 · United States Tax Court · Apr 24, 1969

The doctrine of Helvering v. Taylor, supra, has no application in a renegotiation case. The manner in which the Board reached its determination is without significance in this de novo proceeding. … Nathan Cohen v. Secretary of War, 1 T.C. 1002 . The contractor is not relieved of his burden in this Court by any showing of what happened in the proceedings before the Board.

Atkins v. Railroad Retirement Board

126 F.R.D. 583 · Special Court under the Regional Rail Reorganization Act · Jun 23, 1989

See Trbovich v. United Mine Workers, 404 U.S. 528 , 538 n. 10, 92 S.Ct. 630 , 636 n. 10, 30 L.Ed.2d 686 (1972); Bush v. Viterna, 740 F.2d 350 , 355 (5th Cir.1984); Meridian Homes Corp. v. Nicholas W. … Westinghouse Electric Corp., 542 F.2d 214, 216 (4th Cir.1976); United States v. Board of School Commissioners, 466 F.2d 573 , 575 (7th Cir.1972); National Farm Lines v. I.C.C., 564 F.2d 381 (10th Cir.1977).

Carolyn v. United States

53 Cust. Ct. 249 · United States Customs Court · Jul 9, 1964

Brown Boveri Corp. v. United States

53 C.C.P.A. 19 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Feb 17, 1966

Boveri Corp., Gehrig Hoban & Co., Inc. v. … It would include conductors, instruments of all Rinds, paneling boards made from steel or marble, a lot of equipment mounted thereon and behind and interconnected.

Hickson v. West

12 Vet. App. 247 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Mar 16, 1999

See Evans v. Brown, 9 Vet.App. 273, 283 (1996); Blackburn v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 97, 102 (1995); Cox v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 95, 98 (1993). … Brown, 7 Vet.App. 517, 526 (1995); Littke v.

R. L. Brown Coal & Coke Co. v. Commissioner

14 B.T.A. 609 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 7, 1928

Brown, as an individual, received a liquidating dividend from R. L. Brown Coal & *615 Coke Co. in 1921 of $29,425.38. … Brown as an individual and not to the company. The evidence indicates that R. L. Brown received no liquidating dividend from the corporation in 1921. The contention of the petitioners upon this point is sustained.

United States v. American Brown Boveri Electric Corp.

17 C.C.P.A. 329 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Dec 19, 1929

Box Board & Lining Co. v. Commissioner

5 B.T.A. 289 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 30, 1926

The evidence submitted does not convince the Board that taxpayer acquired good will of any determinable cash value.

Brown & Root, Inc. v. United States

116 F. Supp. 732 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 1, 1953

Standard Accident Insurance Company v. United States, 102 Ct.Cl. 770 ; certiorari denied, 325 U.S. 870 , 65 S.Ct. 1409 , 89 L.Ed. 1989 ; General Steel Corp. v. United States, supra; Kolker v. … Callahan Construction Co. v. United States, 91 Ct.Cl. 538, 616 ; Rust Engineering Co. v. United States, 86 Ct.Cl. 461, 473 .

Board of Education v. United States

30 Ct. Cl. 160 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 4, 1895

Wentzell, president of the board of education. … The school district boards, under whatever name they existed, were a part of the State, and could not be loyal while the State was in rebellion.

Council for Educ. v. Comm'r

106 T.C.M. 669 · United States Tax Court · Dec 16, 2013

See Coal. to Defend Affirmative Action v. Brown, 674 F.3d 1128 (9th Cir. 2012) (upholding the Court of Appeals’ earlier opinion Coal. for Econ. Equity v. Wilson, 122 F.3d 692 (9th Cir. 1997)). II. … Prominent among petitioner’s shortcomings are the lack of a formal business plan and an independent board of directors to provide operational guidance and oversight.14 See P.L.L. Scholarship Fund v.

Board of Directors v. United States

98 Ct. Cl. 348 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 1, 1943

French v. War Contracts Price Adjustment Board

13 T.C. 276 · United States Tax Court · Aug 29, 1949

The petitioner has failed to produce any evidence that the determination by the War Contracts Price Adjustment Board of the amount of excessive profits received by him in 1943 was erroneous. … s renegotiable profits from commissions received from his principals on sales to the Supply Department of the Navy during 1943 were excessive in the amount of $29,910, as determined by the War Contracts Price Adjustment Board

Jimmy H. Floore v. Eric K. Shinseki

26 Vet. App. 376 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Nov 5, 2013

Brown, 7 Vet.App. 517, 527 (1995) (Board’s statement “must be adequate to enable a claimant to understand the precise basis for the Board’s decision, as well as to facilitate review in this Court”); see also Hatlestad v. … James v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 495 (1995) (reversing Board decision based, in part, on VA social and industrial survey and letter from potential employer); Gary, supra. On remand, Mr.

North American Aviation, Inc. v. Renegotiation Board

39 T.C. 207 · United States Tax Court · Oct 25, 1962

Warner v. War Contracts Price Adjust. Board, 14 T.C. 1320 , and United States v. Warsaw Elevator Co., 213 F. 2d 517 . … Here, as in Boeing Co. v. Renegotiation Board, 37 T.C. 613 , respondent’s primary contention is that petitioner’s profits are excessive because they constitute an unreasonable return on book net worth.

Brady v. War Contracts Price Adjustment Board

11 T.C. 280 · United States Tax Court · Sep 15, 1948

In Railroad Co. v. Grant, 98 U. … J. 825; Hallowell v. Commons, 239 U. S. 506 ; and American Coast Line, Inc., 6 T. C. 67, 73 ; affd., 159 Fed. (2d) 665.

Tucker v. West

11 Vet. App. 369 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Aug 13, 1998

Brown, 10 Vet.App. 194, 196 (1997), and articulate how pain on use was factored into its decision, see DeLuca v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 202, 208 (1995). No statements concerning the impact of pain are in this Board decision. … See generally Hicks v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 417, 422 (1995).

Transducer Patents Co. v. Renegotiation Board

58 T.C. 329 · United States Tax Court · May 18, 1972

Cromwell v. … See, e.g., Gayler v. Wilder, 51 U.S. 501 ; Littlefield v. Perry, 21 Wall. 205 ; Rude v. Westcott, 130 U.S. 152 ; Waterman v. Mackenzie, 138 U.S. 252 ; E. W. Bliss Co. v. United States, 253 U.S. 187 ; Crown, Co. v.

James v. Barringer v. James B. Peake

22 Vet. App. 242 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Sep 9, 2008

See Carbino v. Gober, 10 Vet.App. 507 (1997); Bucklinger v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 435 (1993). … See Bagwell v. Brown, 9 Vet.App. 337, 339 (1996).

Christie v. United States

518 F.2d 584 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 11, 1975

The decision of the AEO was affirmed by the CSC Board of Appeals and Review (BAR) on December 8,1972. … Compare Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 (1972) with Perry v. Sindermann, 408 U.S. 593 (1972). Since plaintiff voluntarily relinquished her property interest, the CSC correctly denied her hearing request.