Case law

Marilee Brown v. Department of the Interior

2014 MSPB 40 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Jun 4, 2014

SF-0752-12-0675-I-1 Marilee Brown, Appellant, v. … See Beard v. General Services Administration, 801 F.2d 1318 , 1322 (1986) (the Board will give deference to an agency’s decision regarding a penalty); McPherson v. U.S.

Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. v. United States

115 Fed. Cl. 46 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 7, 2014

KELLOGG BROWN & ROOT * § 7103 (Supp. … A companion decision issued earlier today dismissing Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. v. United States, No. 12- 780C (Fed. Cl.

Humane Society of the United States v. Brown

19 Ct. Int'l Trade 1104 · United States Court of International Trade · Aug 18, 1995

E.g., Jenkins v. … Their first pleaded cause of action alleges a violation by defendant Brown of section 1826a(b)(l)(A), supra.

Brown v. United States

42 Cust. Ct. 337 · United States Customs Court · Mar 30, 1959

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of beef similar in all material respects to that the subject of United States v. J. B. … Brown et al. ( 46 C.C.P.A. 1 , C.A.D. 686), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Brown v. United States

43 Cust. Ct. 337 · United States Customs Court · Sep 15, 1959

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of beef similar in all material respects to that the subject of United States v. J. H. … Brown et al. ( 46 C.C.P.A. 1 , C.A.D. 686), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Brown v. United States

38 Cust. Ct. 116 · United States Customs Court · Mar 5, 1957

Tower & Sons et al. v. United States, 30 Cust. Ct. 235 , C. D. 1526 (1953). The later is Swift & Company et al. v. United States, 33 Cust. Ct. 121 , C. D. 1655 (1954). … In our opinion, the diced or cut stew meat has become a new commercial entity and, within the definition in United States v. Conkey & Co., 12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 552 , T. D. 40783, should be classified as prepared meat.

Brown v. United States

42 Cust. Ct. 337 · United States Customs Court · Mar 30, 1959

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of beef similar in all material respects to that the subject of United States v. J. H. … Brown et al. ( 46 C.C.P.A. 1 , C.A.D. 686), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Brown v. United States

42 Cust. Ct. 336 · United States Customs Court · Mar 30, 1959

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of beef similar in all material respects to that the subject of United States v. J. E. … Brown et al. ( 46 C.C.P.A. 1 , C.A.D. 686), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Brown v. United States

42 Cust. Ct. 328 · United States Customs Court · Mar 24, 1959

In accordance with stipulation of counsel tbat the merchandise consists of beef similar in all material respects to that the subject of United States v. J. S. … Brown et al. ( 46 C.C.P.A. 1 , C.A.D. 686), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Howell v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 9, 2023

Gurley v. Peake, 528 F.3d 1322, 1327 (Fed. Cir. 2008); Former Emps. of Motorola Ceramic Prod. v. United States, 336 F.3d 1360, 1363–64, 1366 (Fed. Cir. 2003) (discussing Buckhannon Board and Care Home, Inc. v. … Silva v. United States, 138 Fed. Cl. 325, 330 (2018); Davis v. Nicholson, 475 F.3d 1360, 1366 (Fed. Cir. 2007). The Court’s remand order did not find error or reach the merits of Plaintiff’s claims in any way.

Brown v. United States

22 Cust. Ct. 216 · United States Customs Court · Dec 29, 1948

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in John Barr v. United States ( 11 Cust. Ct. 88 , C. … (See John Barr v. United States, 324 U. S. 83 .)

Brown v. United States

42 Cust. Ct. 337 · United States Customs Court · Mar 30, 1959

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of beef similar in all material respects to- that the subject of United States v. J. B. … Brown et al. ( 46 C.C.P.A. 1 , C.A.D. 686), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Brown v. United States

42 Cust. Ct. 329 · United States Customs Court · Mar 24, 1959

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of beef similar in all material respects to that the subject of United States v. J. H. … Brown et al. ( 46 C.C.P.A. 1 C.A.D. 686), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. v. United States

117 Fed. Cl. 1 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 26, 2014

During each evaluation period, KBR was monitored by an Award Fee Evaluation Board (AFEB). Clause H-36 ¶ b. … Co. v.

Vaughn Machinery Co. v. Renegotiation Board

30 T.C. 949 · United States Tax Court · Jul 31, 1958

C. 200 ; Providence Wool Combing Co. v. Secretary of War, 14 T. C. 979 ; Western Precipitation Corporation v. R. F. C., 9 T, C. 877; Nathan Cohen v. Secretary of War, 7 T. C. 1002 . … Co. v. Secretary of War, 7 T. C. 863, 886 .

Brown v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 17, 2015

On August 11, 2015, Respondent filed a motion to stay the proceedings pending the undersigned’s issuance of a decision in Houck v. … Although Petitioner’s counsel amended his application to reflect the rates approved in McCulloch v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., No. 09-293V, 2015 WL 5634323 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr.

Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. v. United States

115 Fed. Cl. 168 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 7, 2014

According to plaintiff, the RIO contract services were provided to the United States Army Corps of Engineers (the Corps) by Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. … The board thus differentiated between the request for contract interpretation submitted to the contracting officer and the claims before the board in the appeal.

G Eorge R. T Heiss v. Anthony J. Principi

18 Vet. App. 204 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jul 27, 2004

Skinner v. Brown, 27 F.3d 1571, 1572 (Fed.Cir.1994) (quoting Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. … See Ozer v. Principi, 14 Vet.App. 257, 264 (2001); Davenport v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 476, 482 (1995).

BRC Lease Co. v. United States

93 Fed. Cl. 67 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 25, 2010

Corp. v. … See, e.g., Rockwell Automation, Inc. v.

07-08 296

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Mar 31, 2015

See Bernard v. Brown, 4 Vet. App. 384 (1993); Sutton v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 553 (1996); see also 38 C.F.R. § 20.1102 (2014) (harmless error). … Individual unemployability must be determined without regard to any non-service-connected disabilities or a veteran's advancing age. 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.341(a), 4.19; Van Hoose v. Brown, 4 Vet. App. 361 (1993).