Case law

Brown Boveri Corp. v. United States

43 Cust. Ct. 335 · United States Customs Court · Sep 4, 1959

Brown v. United States

67 Ct. Cl. 172 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 11, 1929

Brown, was appointed professor librarian at the United States Naval Academy, at the rate of $3,600 per annum, for the period from July 1, 1919, to July 1, 1924. … This doctrine was announced in the ease of Keim v. United States, 33 C. Cls. 174 , and has since been consistently followed. In the case of Stilling v. United States, 41 C.

Brown Boveri Corp. v. United States

60 Cust. Ct. 343 · United States Customs Court · Apr 1, 1968

Boveri Corp., Gehrig, Hoban & Co., Inc. v. … Accepting the foregoing stipulation of facts and following the authority cited, Brown Boveri Corp. and Gehrig, Hoban & Co., Inc. v.

Brandon Brown, Inc. v. United States

54 Cust. Ct. 289 · United States Customs Court · Dec 29, 1964

Brown Boveri Corp. v. United States

52 Cust. Ct. 374 · United States Customs Court · Jun 11, 1964

Brown & Kruger, Inc. v. United States

22 Cust. Ct. 335 · United States Customs Court · Jun 3, 1949

Brown ex rel. Mitchell v. Commissioner

5 B.T.A. 209 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 27, 1926

Brown, is entitled to a deduction in 1918 or 1919 with respect to advances made to the Ajax Co., and whether he is entitled to a loss with respect to his investment in the stock of that company. … There is no evidence that Brown exercised bad judgment in his control of the corporation in acquiring the properties which the corporation operated.

BRIONES

24 I. & N. Dec. 355 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 2007

Hunker III, Chief Counsel BEFORE: Board Panel: FILPPU, COLE, and PAULEY, Board Members. … Ass’n v.

Brown Durrell Co. v. United States

21 Cust. Ct. 169 · United States Customs Court · Jun 30, 1948

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as the gloves which were the subject of United States v. Julius Kayser & Co. (33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. 333).

Brown Boveri Corp. v. United States

61 Cust. Ct. 235 · United States Customs Court · Oct 8, 1968

Brown Boveri Corp. v. United States

57 Cust. Ct. 814 · United States Customs Court · Oct 6, 1966

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of meters similar in all material respects to those the subject of United States v. G. L.

Bay Co. v. Renegotiation Board

38 T.C. 535 · United States Tax Court · Jul 30, 1962

Fisher, Judge: Petitioner, for the purpose of contesting an order of the Renegotiation Board, upon renegotiation of its contracts, that $50,000 of its profits for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1952, was excessive, … Stoner Manufacturing Corp. v. Secretary of War, 21 T.C. 200, 208 (1953); Nathan Cohen v. Secretary of War, 7 T.C. 1002, 1011 (1946).

Robert F. Brown v. The United States

426 F.2d 355 · United States Court of Claims · May 15, 1970

V) are as follows: § 75. … See United States v. Southwestern Cable Co., 392 U.S. 157, 170 , 88 S.Ct. 1994 , 20 L.Ed.2d 1001 (1968) ; Haynes v. United States, 390 U.S. 85, 87 , 88 S.Ct. 722 , 19 L.Ed.2d 923, n. 4 (1968) ; United States v.

Hill Brown Corp. v. United States

54 C.C.P.A. 99 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 11, 1967

While section 402 (e) is to be interpreted liberally, United States v. … Kenneth Kittleson v. United States, 40 CCPA 85, C.A.D. 502.

Brown & Root, Inc. v. United States

116 F. Supp. 732 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 1, 1953

Standard Accident Insurance Company v. United States, 102 C. Cls. 770 ; cert. den., 325 U. S. 870 ; General Steel Corp. v. United States, supra; Kolker v. United States, 40 F. Supp. 972 (D. C. Md.). … Miller v. Litzerich (Tex. Civ. App.), 49 S. W. 2d 404 ; Coleman v. Wright (Tex.), 155 S. W. 2d 382 ; 85 A. L. R. 451.

11-10 929

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Aug 27, 2015

App. 97, 105 (2008); Dyment v. West, 13 Vet. App. 141, 146-47 (1999) (remand not required under Stegall v. West, 11 Vet. … App. 268 (1998), where the Board's remand instructions were substantially complied with), aff'd, Dyment v. Principi, 287 F.3d 1377 (2002).

13-09 374

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Nov 30, 2015

See Gabrielson v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 36, 39-40 (1994); Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet. App. 49, 57 (1990). … See, e.g., Hayes v. Brown, 5 Vet. App. 60, 69-70 (1993) (citing Wood v. Derwinski, 1 Vet. App. 190, 192-93 (1992)) and Guerrieri v. Brown, 4 Vet.

Kellogg Brown & Root Services Inc. v. United States

103 Fed. Cl. 714 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 2, 2012

See Kellogg Brown & Root Servs., Inc. v. … DeRoche, Paul Morrell, Inc. v. Kellogg Brown & Root Servs., Inc., No. 1:08cv072, at 261 (E.D.Va.

Mitsubishi Electronics Industries Canada, Inc. v. Brown

917 F. Supp. 836 · United States Court of International Trade · Feb 21, 1996

commenced pursuant to subsection (a) of this section prior to the entry into force of the NAFTA or of the Agreement, (iv) a determination which a binational panel has determined is not reviewable by the binational panel, (v) … The exceptions stated in § 1516a(g)(3)(iv) & (v) also do not grant this Court jurisdiction since the binational panel has not yet decided that the determination is not reviewable, nor has it terminated the proceeding.

De Brown Auto Sales Co. v. Commissioner

2 B.T.A. 896 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 16, 1925

You may state who kept the minutes of the meeting of the Board of Directors on January 6, 1919. A. I did. Q. What directors were present at that meeting? A. L. H. DeBrown, W. E. Barkley, Frank DeBrown, C. F.