Case law

Damon J. Brown v. Department of Defense

2014 MSPB 74 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Sep 12, 2014

Brown, Appellant, v. … See Durr v.

E-Farahji v. Brown

5 Vet. App. 278 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jul 2, 1993

E-Farahji, appeals a July 15, 1991, decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA) granting compen-sable evaluations of 10% each for right and left iliac crest donor site bone graft scars. … See Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 49 (1990). Summary affirmance is appropriate when, as here, the issue is of relative simplicity and the outcome is not reasonably debatable. See Frankel v.

Brown & Bigelow v. Eugene Dietzgen Co.

203 F.2d 764 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 15, 1953

Brown v. United States

28 Fed. Cl. 141 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 20, 1993

Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 47 , 78 S.Ct. 99, 103 , 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957). … Brown on January 20, 1980; Messrs. Hicks and Ponton on June 7, 1980; and Mr. Williams on December 1, 1980. These dates represent the first day for which each individual seeks back pay. .

Corazon R. Patricio v. David J. Shulkin

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Aug 31, 2017

The Board is obliged to address all material issues and questions of fact, see 38 U.S.C. § 7104(d)(1); Caluza v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 498, 506 (1995), aff'd per curiam, 78 F.3d 604 (Fed. … The Court reminds the Board that "[a] remand is meant to entail a critical examination of the justification for [the Board's] decision," Fletcher v.

California ex rel. Brown v. United States

105 Fed. Cl. 18 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 2, 2012

CPUC v. FERC, 462 F.3d at 1051-53 . … In Unisys Corp. v.

Yitzchok D. Rand & Shulamis Klugman v. Commissioner

141 T.C. No. 12 · United States Tax Court · Nov 18, 2013

Feller v. … United States v. Menasche, 348 U.S. 528, 538-539 (1955) (“‘The cardinal principle of statutory construction is to save and not to destroy.’ Labor Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp., 301 U.S. 1, 30 (1937).

Rogers, Brown & Crocker Bros., Inc. v. Commissioner

32 B.T.A. 307 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 29, 1935

07-35 753

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Apr 29, 2016

See Shinseki v. Sanders, 129 S. Ct. 1696 (2009). None is found by the Board. Indeed, VA's duty to notify has been more than satisfied. … Under the circumstances, the Board finds that there has been substantial compliance with its remand. See Dyment v. West, 13 Vet. App. 141, 146-147 (1999) (remand not required under Stegall v. West, 11 Vet.

07-35 753

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Apr 29, 2016

See Shinseki v. Sanders, 129 S. Ct. 1696 (2009). None is found by the Board. Indeed, VA's duty to notify has been more than satisfied. … Under the circumstances, the Board finds that there has been substantial compliance with its remand. See Dyment v. West, 13 Vet. App. 141, 146-147 (1999) (remand not required under Stegall v. West, 11 Vet.

Eaton, Brown & Simpson, Inc. v. United States

62 Ct. Cl. 668 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 13, 1926

The claim was referred to a board of three representatives of the Government, who made a report thereon, recommending allowances on some of the items and rejecting others. … See Penn Bridge Co. v. United States, 59 C. Cls. 892, 896 . The sum stated should be charged off against the allowance made to the plaintiff.

Brown, Riley & Co. v. United States

20 Ct. Cl. 416 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 1, 1885

. *421 Guided by these opiuious of the Supreme Court, the Court of Claims decides that Brown, Riley & Co. are entitled to recover as principal $1,500, and as interest $32.25; E. D.

Brown v. United States

32 Ct. Cl. 379 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 19, 1897

(United States v. Mouat, 124 U. S., 303 ; United States v. Hendee, ib., 309.) These decisions, of course, meant that a paymaster’s clerk was and was not an officer within the intent of certain statutes. … uncertain whether an officer always employed on shore duty and in one of the occupations of civil life, the erection and superintendence of buildings, whose prescribed duties, indeed, precluded his ever rendering service on board

Brown v. United States

66 Ct. Cl. 407 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 3, 1928

Brown, entered the military service of the United States as an enlisted man on January 8, 1918, and was assigned the same day as a private, first class, to the officers’ training school at Camp Custer, Michigan. … We think the decision of the Supreme Court in United States v. Rider, 261 U. S. 363 , determines that plaintiff is not entitled to recover the balance of his claim.

Brown Boveri Corp. v. United States

43 Cust. Ct. 335 · United States Customs Court · Sep 4, 1959

Brown v. United States

51 Ct. Cl. 22 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 6, 1915

Electric Lighting Co. v. Elder Bros., 115 Ala., 138 ; Greenberg v. Lumb, 129 N. Y. Supp., 182 ; Fechteler v. Whittemore, 205 Mass., 6 ; Exhaust Ventilator Co. v. Ry. Co., 66 Wis., 218 . … In Greenberg v.

Brown v. United States

44 Ct. Cl. 283 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 8, 1909

S., 288 ; Cherokee Nation v. Hitchcock, 187 U. S., 294, 307 ). … As was said by the court in the case of Lone Wolf v. Hitchcock ( 187 U. S., 553, 567 ), quoting from the case of United States v. Kagama ( 118 U.

Brown v. United States

68 Ct. Cl. 458 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 2, 1929

This court in the case of Hutchins v. United States, 27 C.

Brown v. United States

67 Ct. Cl. 172 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 11, 1929

Brown, was appointed professor librarian at the United States Naval Academy, at the rate of $3,600 per annum, for the period from July 1, 1919, to July 1, 1924. … This doctrine was announced in the ease of Keim v. United States, 33 C. Cls. 174 , and has since been consistently followed. In the case of Stilling v. United States, 41 C.

Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. Commissioner

16 T.C. 432 · United States Tax Court · Feb 26, 1951

See United States v. O. J. Morrison Stores of Fairmont (CCA-4), 99 Fed. (2d) 77.