Case law

Pilar F. Suaviso v. R. James Nicholson

19 Vet. App. 532 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Mar 10, 2006

See Elkins v. … v.

ARMENDAREZ

24 I. & N. Dec. 646 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 2008

Brown v. Gardner, 513 U.S. 115, 118 (1994); see also National Ass’n of Home Builders v. Defenders of Wildlife, 127 S. … (quoting FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 132 (2000))). When the departure bar rule is examined in context, we believe it clearly applies to removed aliens.

Faunda R. Hatch v. Anthony J. Principi

18 Vet. App. 527 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Dec 2, 2004

It is well established that, although the Board is bound by the precedent opinions of the VA General Counsel, this Court is not so bound. See Theiss v. Principi, 18 Vet.App. 204, 210 (2004); Cottle v. … Principi, 14 Vet.App. 329, 335 (2001); Sabonis v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 426, 429 (1994); see also 38 U.S.C. §§ 7104(c), 7261. The Court reviews the Secretary's interpretation of law de novo. See Butts v.

Bove v. Shinseki

25 Vet. App. 136 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Dec 20, 2011

Brown, 8 Vet.App. 305, 307 (1995), over time it was held to be a time limitation that could be equitably tolled. Bailey v. West, 160 F.3d 1360 (Fed. Cir. 1998) (en banc) (relying on Irwin v. Dep't of Vet. … See, e.g., Brandenburg v. Principi, 371 F.3d 1362, 1364 (Fed. Cir. 2004) (NOA submitted to Board); Barrett v. Principi, 363 F.3d 1316, 1321 (Fed.

Keltner v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims · May 16, 2023

, etc., or was in violation of some other substantive right.”); see Brown v. … Healthy City Board of Ed. v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274 (1977))); Christian v. United States, 337 F.3d 1338, 1343 (Fed.

United States v. Brown & Co.

10 Ct. Cust. 89 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Mar 24, 1920

In Wright & Graham Co. v. United States ( 5 Ct. Cust. Appls. 453 ; T. … The Government strenuously urges that the question now before us is res judicata because in the case of United States v. Brown & Co. ( 9 Ct. Cust. Appls., 45 ; T.

Brown Paper Mill Co. v. Commissioner

23 T.C. 47 · United States Tax Court · Oct 15, 1954

V. Reconstruction. … Dixie Pine Products Co. v. Commissioner, 320 U. S. 516 , Security Flour Mills Co. v. Commissioner, 321 U.

Hogue v. Derwinski

3 Vet. App. 280 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Sep 24, 1992

Schafrath v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 589, 592-93 (1991); see also EF v. … The Board may not ignore relevant lay evidence, but must consider and discuss it as it would any other evidence. See Pruitt v. Derwinski, 2 Vet.App. 83, 85 (1992); Cartright v.

Humane Soc. of US v. Brown

920 F. Supp. 178 · United States Court of International Trade · Feb 16, 1996

Defendant Brown has now admitted each. See Plaintiffs’ Exhibit 80. … The elements of defendant Brown’s approach are summarized as follows: ...

Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. United States

69 Fed. Cl. 784 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 25, 2006

Co. v. … Memoranda Prepared for the Board of Directors A.

United States v. Brown & Co.

5 Ct. Cust. 212 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 7, 1914

In support of its contention the Government relies chiefly upon the decisions of this court in the case of United States v. White ( 2 Ct. Cust. Appls., 80 ; T. D. 31632), and the case of Dejonge v. United States ( 3 Ct. … See Stiner v. United States ( 2 Ct. Cust. Appls., 347 ; T.

Brown v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 15, 2019

, * Doctrine; Boling v. … FACTS Plaintiffs Allan Brown and Brown Sod Farm, LLC, own property along the Verdigris River, south of Lake Oologah in Rogers County, Oklahoma.

Brown v. Commissioner

85 T.C. 397 · United States Tax Court · Aug 26, 1985

Brown & Roese v. United States

24 Cust. Ct. 444 · United States Customs Court · Apr 27, 1950

Ennis-Brown Co. v. Commissioner

10 B.T.A. 1248 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 8, 1928

The opinion of the Board in Butler's Warehouses, Inc., 1 B. T. A., 851, contains quotations from the Congressional Record showing the intent of Congress in enacting section 204 of the Revenue Act of 1918. … Auburn & Alton Coal Co., v. United States, 61 Ct. Cls. 438. This petitioner’s fiscal year 1919 began September 1, 1918, prior to the period designated by the special relief provisions of section 204 of the 1918 Act.

Ernest W. Brown, Inc. v. Commissioner

28 T.C. 682 · United States Tax Court · Jun 21, 1957

Brown cease to act as President of Ernest W. … This business had been conducted by Brown since 1918 and was to be carried on by Brown on behalf of petitioner.

Brown & Roese v. United States

20 Cust. Ct. 274 · United States Customs Court · Feb 26, 1948

Brown Agency, Inc. v. Commissioner

21 B.T.A. 1111 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 12, 1931

hearing the respondent admitted that evidence adduced at the hearing, which had never been previously put before the respondent, lead unavoidably to the conclusion that the officers’ salaries were duly authorized by the board

Brown & Co. v. United States

5 Ct. Cust. 396 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Nov 18, 1914

The board found that all of the slippers were composed in chief value of straw, and accordingly sustained the protests claiming that the goods were manufactures in chief value of straw and overruled those in which it was … We think the protests involved in this appeal were wholly insufficient and that therefore they were properly overruled by the board. The decision of the Board of General Appraisers is affirmed.

Marshall v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 1, 2023

The BCNR, like other correction boards, is obligated both to determine “the true nature of an alleged [error or] injustice and to take steps to grant thorough and fitting relief” to a successful applicant. Roth v. … The Board therefore fulfilled its duty; and by regulation, other military components must then calculate the specific payments that flow from the Board’s decision.