Case law

United States v. Brown & Co.

9 Ct. Cust. 45 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jan 28, 1919

United States v. Hohner et al. ( 4 Ct. Cust. Appls., 122 ; T. … It is very evident, therefore, that United States v.

Brown v. Commissioner

20 B.T.A. 47 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 13, 1930

See Vidal v. Girard, 43 U. S. 126, 196 , and footnote to Wheeler v. Smith, 50 U. S. 55 ; In re Dulles’ Estate, 218 Pa. 162 ; 67 Atl. 49 . … Bekins v. Smith, 37 Cal. App. 222 ; 174 Pac. 96 .

Armour & Co. of Delaware v. Brown

137 F.2d 233 · Emergency Court of Appeals · Aug 6, 1943

OF DELAWARE v. BROWN, Price Adm'r. Nos. 26-28. United States Emergency Court of Appeals. Heard July 8, 1943. Decided August 6, 1943. *234 Donald R. Richberg, of Chicago, Ill. (George E.

MacAulay-brown, Inc. v. United States

125 Fed. Cl. 591 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 18, 2016

See id. at 1382 (citing Weeks Marine, Inc. v. … A-T Sols., Inc. v. United States, 122 Fed. Cl. 170, 185 (2015) (citing Sierra Nev. Corp. v. United States, 107 Fed. Cl. 735, 750 (2012); Sheridan Corp. v. United States, 95 Fed.

Board v. Commissioner

14 B.T.A. 374 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 20, 1928

This same transaction was before the Board in V. J. Bulleit, 3 B. T. A. 631. … In support of this position, petitioner cites United States v.

Board v. Commissioner

18 B.T.A. 650 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 7, 1930

Perry v. West

11 Vet. App. 319 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jul 16, 1998

See Bazalo, supra; see also March v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 163, 169 (1994); Cook v. … See Doria v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 157, 163 (1995).

Piotrowski v. Brown

9 Vet. App. 215 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jun 28, 1996

Jones v. Brown, 41 F.3d 634, 639 (Fed.Cir.1994) (“Congress need not enact a dictionary each time it passes a law”). … Richards v. United States, 369 U.S. 1, 11 , 82 S.Ct. 585, 592 , 7 L.Ed.2d 492 (1962). “ ‘[T]he meaning of statutory language, plain or not, depends on context.’ ”. Brown v.

Leopoldo v. Brown

9 Vet. App. 33 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Mar 27, 1996

On February 19, 1993, the Court issued a panel opinion remanding this matter to the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board) for read-judication. Leopoldo v. Brown, 4 Vet.App. 216 (1993). Mandate issued on May 25, 1993. … Chisem v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 374, 375 (1995).

Klugerman v. Brown

8 Vet. App. 286 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Oct 30, 1995

On September 8, 1995, the Secretary filed a brief arguing that the Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision was not clearly erroneous. The Court construes the appellant’s motion as one for summary disposition. … The criteria for summary disposition are set forth in Frankel v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 23 (1990); see Joshua v.

Thomas v. Brown

9 Vet. App. 67 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Apr 9, 1996

See Smith (William) v. Brown, 35 F.3d 1516, 1527 (Fed.Cir. 1994); Duran v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 216 (1994); Winslow v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 469 (1996).

Wilson v. Brown

7 Vet. App. 542 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Apr 21, 1995

Brown, 7 Vet.App. 476, 481 (1995). … Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 49, 53 (1990).

Martin v. Brown

8 Vet. App. 138 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Aug 11, 1995

As the Court stated in Melson v.

Carroll v. Brown

8 Vet. App. 128 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Aug 11, 1995

Glynn v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 523, 528-29 (1994). Evidence is new when it is not merely cumulative of other evidence of record. Cox v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 95, 98 (1993); Sklar v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 140, 145 (1993); Colvin v. … Booth v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 109, 112 (1995).

Jaquay v. Brown

9 Vet. App. 16 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Mar 12, 1996

Donovan v. … Smith (George) v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 546, 551-52 (1996) (en banc) (“appellant cannot be deprived of his or her right to appeal to this Court as a result of the Chairman’s action to reconsider a prior decision”).

Morris v. Brown

9 Vet. App. 1 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Feb 12, 1996

See Morris v. Brown, U.S.Vet.App. No. 95-325, 1995 WL 262233 (April 25, 1995); Morris v. Brown, U.S.Vet.App. No. 95-941, 8 Vet.App. 499 (October 26, 1995); Morris v. Brown, U.S.Vet.App. … See generally Attwood v.

Cgs-Asp Security, Jv, LLC v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 14, 2022

Brown Constructors, Inc. v. Pena, 132 F.3d 724, 734–35 (Fed. … Brown Constructors, Inc., 132 F.3d at 734 (quoting Wilner v. United States, 24 F.3d 1397, 1401–02 (Fed. Cir. 1994)).

Mata v. Brown

8 Vet. App. 485 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jan 17, 1996

See 38 U.S.C. §§ 5108 , 7104(b); Stanton v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 563, 5 .66 (1993). Whether evidence is “new and material” is a question of law that this Court reviews de novo. See Masors v. … Derwinski, 2 Vet.App. 181, 185 (1992); Colvin v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 171, 174 (1991). “‘New’ evidence is that which is not merely cumulative of other evidence of record.” Cox v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 95, 98 (1993).

Keel v. Brown

8 Vet. App. 363 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Nov 29, 1995

On July 24, 1995, this Court, unaware of the appellant’s death, vacated the September 17,1993, Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision (Board) and remanded the matter for readjudication. Keel v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 82 (1995). … v.

Smith v. Brown

8 Vet. App. 331 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Oct 25, 1995

Smith v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 327 (1995). The Court awarded attorney fees based on the number of hours the appellant spent litigating his appeal before this Court and preparing his EAJA application. … See Curtis v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 104, 108 (1995) (acknowledging the award of attorney fees for time spent preparing an EAJA application and “successfully defending a fee application on appeal”). .'