Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersFS

10,000+ results

0.89s

  • Craft v. United States

    544 F.2d 468 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 16, 1976

    See, e.g., Newman v. United States, 185 Ct. Cl. 269, 276 (1968) ; Beckham v. United States, 183 Ct. Cl. 628, 635-36 , 392 F. 2d 619, 622 (1968) ; Smith v. United States, 168 Ct. Cl. 545, 553 (1964). … Cooper v. United States, 178 Ct. Cl. 277, 316 (1967). Since the Appeals Board failed to remedy the Council’s defects, its decision must rise or fall with that of the Council.

    Cited 45 timesPublished
  • Brundage v. United States

    504 F.2d 1382 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 23, 1974

    See e.g., Grisham v. United States, 183 Ct. Cl. 657 , 392 F. 2d 980 , cert. denied, 393 U.S. 843 (1968) ; Jackson v. United States, 179 Ct. Cl. 29 , cert. denied, 389 U.S. 985 (1967) ; Gersten v. United States, 176 Ct. … See e.g., Grisham, supra; Gersten, supra; Alpert, supra; Albright v. United States, 161 Ct. Cl. 356 (1963) ; Bovard, supra; Miner v. United States, 143 Ct. Cl. 801 (1958) ; Dion v. United States, 137 Ct. Cl. 166 (1956).

    Abrogated on other grounds by Ronald J. Cornetta v. The United States of America and John Lehman, Secretary of the Navy, 851 F.2d 1372 (1988)Cited 111 timesPublished
  • Greene v. United States

    65 Fed. Cl. 375 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 29, 2005

    The Board found that Mr. … the Correction Board, any transcripts of proceedings, and the documents memorializing the board’s determinations.

    Cited 43 timesPublished
  • Brown v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 15, 2020

    Brown and Ruth Hunt-Brown, assert a tax refund claim for tax years 2015 and 2017 against defendant, seeking recovery of “federal income tax and interest erroneously paid . . . or erroneously assessed and collected by the … The Form 2848 was not signed by plaintiff George Brown but, instead, by Tiffany Michelle Hunt. Id. at 2.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Michael W. Canady v. R. James Nicholson

    20 Vet. App. 353 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Sep 7, 2006

    " Board decision); Matthews v. … (quoting Crippen v. Brown, 9 Vet.App. 412, 418 (1996))).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. District of Columbia

    17 Ct. Cl. 303 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 15, 1881

    Brown (No. 3), Francis Prott (No. 161), Thomas A. Brown and Charles P. P. … Wroe (No. 223), William Dickson (No. 305), and William Dickson (No. 309), v The District of Columbia be consolidated and tried together; and that before the trial some one of the claimants, with such others as may join therein

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Johnson Controls, Inc. v. United States

    671 F.2d 1312 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 10, 1982

    Contracting Co. v. United States, 212 Ct. Cl. 318 , 546 F.2d 395 (1976) provides dispositive guidance in this matter. See also, Space Corp. v. United States, 200 Ct. … It certainly did not act reasonably under the circumstances and the Board rightly denied its claim. See Ling-Temco-Vought, Inc. v. United States, 201 Ct. Cl. 135 , 475 F.2d 630 (1973); see also Snyder Corp. v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Alex Brown, Inc. v. Commissioner

    60 T.C. 364 · United States Tax Court · Jun 11, 1973

    Dixie, Inc. v. Commissioner, 277 F. 2d 526 (C.A. 2, 1960), affirming 31 T.C. 415 (1958); Egan, Inc., v. Commissioner, 236 F. 2d 343 (C.A. 8, 1956), affirming a Memorandum Opinion of this Court; J. … United States v. Donruss Co., supra.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • S-S

    21 I. & N. Dec. 900 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 1997

    See Nguyen v. … see also Pichardo v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Kelly v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 6, 2026

    Voge v. United States, 844 F.2d 776, 779 (Fed. Cir. 1988) (citing Rostker v. Goldberg, 453 U.S. 57, 70 (1981)). … A correction board’s reliance on post-discharge employment to assess fitness is not unreasonable. See O’Hare v. United States, 155 Fed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown-Crummer Co. v. Commissioner

    19 B.T.A. 750 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 28, 1930

    attorneys for the petitioner and respondent that no evidence be introduced, but that the issues herein presented be submitted, considered and decided upon the transcript of the record made in First National Bank in Wichita v. … Reviewed by the Board. Decision will be entered, wider Bule 50. Smith and Trammell dissent.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown Shoe Co. v. Commissioner

    45 B.T.A. 212 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 26, 1941

    If it was in fact a capital transaction, i. e., if the shares were acquired or parted with in connection with a readjustment of the capital structure of the corporation, the Board rule applies. Doyle v. Mitchell Bros. … Reviewed by the Board. Decision will be entered under Rule 50. Murdock dissents. Art. 22 (a)-16.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Favell v. United States

    22 Cl. Ct. 132 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 27, 1990

    Taylor v. Board of Educ., 288 F.2d 600 , 605 (2d Cir.1961). … See Brown v. United States, 3 Cl.Ct. 409, 413 (1983).

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • M. Brown & Co. v. Commissioner

    9 B.T.A. 753 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 21, 1927

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown Lumber Co. v. Commissioner

    9 B.T.A. 719 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 20, 1927

    R., and where it was argued that f. o. b. was only a factor in the selling price, the court said: * * * “ Free on board ” has acquired a settled judicial meaning. Vogt v. Schienebeck (Wis.) 100 N. W. 820 , 67 L. R. … In support of its position, petitioner cites Richardson Lumber Co. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown Agency, Inc. v. Commissioner

    21 B.T.A. 1111 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 12, 1931

    hearing the respondent admitted that evidence adduced at the hearing, which had never been previously put before the respondent, lead unavoidably to the conclusion that the officers’ salaries were duly authorized by the board

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Phibro Energy, Inc. v. Brown

    19 Ct. Int'l Trade 663 · United States Court of International Trade · May 9, 1995

    United States Foreign-Trade Zones Board, 12 Fed. Cir. (T) _, 18 F.3d 1581 (1994) (Conoco II), 3 and remanded to the CIT for adjudication on the merits. See Phibro Energy, Inc. v. Brown, No. 93-1389, Slip Op. at 1 (Fed. … basis for the [Board’s] action that the [Board] itself has not given * * [Bowman Transp., Inc. v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Ennis-Brown Co. v. Commissioner

    10 B.T.A. 1248 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 8, 1928

    The opinion of the Board in Butler's Warehouses, Inc., 1 B. T. A., 851, contains quotations from the Congressional Record showing the intent of Congress in enacting section 204 of the Revenue Act of 1918. … Auburn & Alton Coal Co., v. United States, 61 Ct. Cls. 438. This petitioner’s fiscal year 1919 began September 1, 1918, prior to the period designated by the special relief provisions of section 204 of the 1918 Act.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Commissioner

    21 B.T.A. 752 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 17, 1930

    A. 545; Model Dairy Co. v. Com missioner, 36 Fed. (2d) 768; Botany Worsted Mills v. United States, 278 U. S. 282 . … In determining the reasonableness of salaries the Board has considered duties discharged, responsibilities assumed, volume of business handled, capital employed, gross income, and net income.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States Gypsum Co. v. Brown

    137 F.2d 803 · Emergency Court of Appeals · Aug 19, 1943

    137 F.2d 803 (1943) UNITED STATES GYPSUM CO. v. BROWN, Price Adm'r. No. 29. United States Emergency Court of Appeals. Argued June 16, 1943. Decided August 19, 1943. Rehearing Denied October 6, 1943. *804 Charles M. … Appendix § 901 et seq. [2] 7 F.R. 3153 . [3] 7 F.R. 5872 . [4] Lakemore Company v. Brown, Em. App., 137 F.2d 355 .

    Cited 15 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.