Case law

Brown v. North Carolina State Board of Elections

394 F. Supp. 359 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Apr 16, 1975

Gray v. Sanders, 372 U.S. 368 , 83 S.Ct. 801 , 9 L.Ed.2d 821 (1963).” … In Lubin v.

Brown v. Lenoir County Board of Elections

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Apr 26, 2021

EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA EASTERN DIVISION NO. 4:20-CV-62-FL LENTON CREDELLE BROWN … Diamond v. Colonial Life & Acc. Ins. Co., 416 F.3d 310, 315 (4th Cir. 2005); Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198, 200 (4th Cir. 1983).

Burgess v. Griffin

585 F. Supp. 1564 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · May 10, 1984

New York, 423 U.S. 61 , 96 S.Ct. 241 , 46 L.Ed.2d 195 (1975); Blackledge v. Perry, 417 U.S. 21 , 94 S.Ct. 2098 , 40 L.Ed.2d 628 (1974). But see Brown v. … Consequently, even if a guilty plea waives a double jeopardy claim, see Brown v. Maryland, 618 F.2d 1057 (4th Cir.1980), such a waiver did not occur in this case. III.

Swann v. Gastonia Housing Authority

502 F. Supp. 362 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Nov 25, 1980

The question of a tenant’s property interest in the tenancy at the expiration of the lease term is governed by the entitlement guidelines set out by the Supreme Court in Board of Regents v. … In Joy v.

Brown v. Crawford

98 F. Supp. 866 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jul 19, 1951

. * * * ’ After preliminary investigation, pursuant to the procedure outlined in State v. … These are: Stonebreaker v. Smyth, 4 Cir., 163 F.2d *868 498, 499 , and Adkins v. Smyth, 4 Cir., 188 F.2d 452 .

Brown v. Rice

693 F. Supp. 381 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Aug 16, 1988

Brown v. North Carolina, 459 U.S. 1080 , 103 S.Ct. 503 , 74 L.Ed.2d 642 (1982). … State v. Brown, 306 N.C. at 163-164 , 293 S.E.2d 569 .

Brown v. Brannon

399 F. Supp. 133 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jul 28, 1975

Brown, Thomas Page, Spence Shannon, Fred McGill, and James Hogge, are owners and operators of their respective massage parlor businesses located within the City of Durham, Durham County, North Carolina. … In Steffel v.

Brown v. Flowers

297 F. Supp. 2d 846 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Dec 12, 2003

For example, in Ciena Corp. v. … Brown has not sufficiently alleged that he was an original owner of the songs in question, or that Mr. Flowers transferred any rights to him, Mr. Flowers’ Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. V.

Brown v. Cross

226 F.R.D. 526 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Aug 18, 2004

Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m); Shao v. Link Cargo (Taiwan) Ltd,., 986 F.2d 700 , 708 (4th Cir.1993). … States v. Ziegler Bolt & Parts Co., 111 F.3d 878, 881 (Fed. Cir. 1997) (citations omitted).

Brown v. Turner

257 F. Supp. 734 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Aug 4, 1966

However, the ease of Johnson v. … United States v. French, 274 F.2d 297 (7th Cir. 1960); United States ex rel. Staples v. Pate, 332 F.2d 531 (7th Cir. 1964); Barnhart v. United States, 270 F.2d 866 (10th Cir. 1959); Hall v.

Doby v. Brown

135 F. Supp. 584 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Nov 4, 1955

Toucey v. New York Life Ins. Co., 314 U.S. 118 , 62 S.Ct. 139 , 86 L.Ed. 100 . The history of that delay is set forth in Brown v. Doby, 242 N.C. 462 , 87 S.E.2d 921 . … Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 ruled that segregation was discriminatory but it did not require a federal judge to become a substitute for local school boards.

Brown v. Langley

348 F. Supp. 2d 533 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Nov 30, 2004

Harris v. Hutchinson, 209 F.3d 325, 330 (4th Cir.2000); see also Spencer v. Sutton, 239 F.3d 626 (4th Cir. *536 2001). … See Minter v. Beck, 230 F.3d 663 (4th Cir.2000) (federal habeas claim was time-barred when more than one year had elapsed from date of conviction until the petitioner filed his § 2254 petition).

Steele v. Brown

993 F. Supp. 918 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jan 21, 1998

See Nunnally v. MacCausland, 996 F.2d 1 (1st Cir.1993); Llewellyn v. Celanese Corp., 693 F.Supp. 369 (W.D.N.C.1988); and Moody v. Bayliner Marine Corp., 664 F.Supp. 232 (E.D.N.C.1987). … Compare Miller v. Runyon, 77 F.3d 189, 191-92 (7th Cir.)

Brown v. Henderson

155 F. Supp. 2d 502 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Dec 14, 2000

Board of Supervisors of L.S.U., 715 F.2d 971 (5th Cir.1983) (creating a three-factor test including whether the harassing act should trigger an employee’s awareness of and duty to assert her rights) with Morgan v. … Brown v. Perry 184 F.3d 388, 396 (4th Cir.1999). Defendant had such a policy.

Stevens v. Brown

564 F. Supp. 368 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Jun 2, 1983

Gillikin v. Springle, 254 N.C. 240 , 118 S.E.2d 611 (1961). … Briscoe v. LaHue, supra (Brennan, Marshall, and Blackmun, JJ., dissenting).

Brown v. Finch

320 F. Supp. 660 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Nov 21, 1969

Davis v. Gardner, 6 Cir., 395 F.2d 681 (1968); Daniel v. Gardner, 5 Cir., 390 F.2d 32 (1968). … In Thomas v.

Almond v. Boyles

612 F. Supp. 223 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jun 25, 1985

See Fitzpatrick v. Bitzer, 519 F.2d at 565 . … See Brown v. Porcker, 502 F.Supp. 946 (D.S.C.1980), aff'd 660 F.2d 1001 (4th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1150 , 103 S.Ct. 796 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1000 (1983). Thus, plaintiffs’ motion for class certification is allowed.

Brown v. Rollins, Inc.

397 F. Supp. 571 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Dec 20, 1974

McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792, 802 , 93 S.Ct. 1817 , 36 L.Ed.2d 668, 677 (1973). See Young v. Edgcomb Steel Co., 499 F.2d 97 (4th Cir. 1974); Brown v. … See Brown v. Gaston County Dyeing Machine Co., supra at 1380-1382. 5.

United States v. Brown

263 F. Supp. 777 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Dec 8, 1966

, the requirement of Rule 37(a) that written notice of appeal be filed within 10 days after entry of judgment was mandatory and jurisdictional, and the district court was without power to enlarge the time, United States v. … It is further ordered that Murray Bowman Brown, having filed notice of appeal within the extended time limit, is hereby authorized to appeal said proceeding without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefor.

United States v. Brown

351 F. Supp. 38 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Nov 16, 1972

As the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals said in United States v. Robinson, 468 F.2d 189 . “The citizen’s right to be left alone demands . . . strict compliance with the letter of this legislative proviso. … “It is appropriate here to recall Justice Brandéis’ famous admonition given nearly forty-five years ago in Olmstead v.