Case law

Bryant

District Court, N.D. California · Jan 7, 2026

v. … Board of Education].”) (cleaned up). The chilling effect is particularly concerning where the case raises issues of public importance, as Bryant’s does. See Hunter v.

Valentini v. Shinseki

860 F. Supp. 2d 1079 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 16, 2012

Story acknowledges that the Library of Congress Trust Fund Board was authorized to accept donations in trust. Story, 184 F.2d at 455 . And in United States v. … See, e.g., Beamon v. Brown, 125 F.3d 965, 974 (6th Cir.1997). In the absence of controlling authority from the United States Supreme Court or the Ninth Circuit, the Court is convinced by the reasoning in Broudy . .

Grason Electric Co. v. Sacramento Municipal Utility District

526 F. Supp. 276 · District Court, E.D. California · Nov 30, 1981

In essence, defendant claims immunity on the grounds that its action is “state action,” Parker v. Brown, 317 U.S. 341 , 63 S.Ct. 307 , 87 L.Ed. 315 (1943). … Midcal Aluminum, Inc., 445 U.S. 97 , 100 S.Ct. 937 , 63 L.Ed.2d 233 (1980), and New Motor Vehicle Board v. Orrin W. Fox Co., 439 U.S. 96 , 99 S.Ct. 403 , 58 L.Ed.2d 361 (1978).

Wynes v. Kaiser Permanente Hospitals

936 F. Supp. 2d 1171 · District Court, E.D. California · Mar 28, 2013

Defendants rely on Brown v. City of Tucson, 336 F.3d 1181, 1190 (9th Cir.2003), in arguing that a hostile work environment claim is not actionable under the ADA. (ECF No. 71' at 15.) … See Earl v.

Coleman v. Brown

938 F. Supp. 2d 955 · District Court, E.D. California · Apr 5, 2013

Brown v. Plata, 131 S.Ct. at 1936. See also Armstrong v. … Brown v. Plata, 131 S.Ct. at 1924-25.

Coleman v. Brown

28 F. Supp. 3d 1068 · District Court, E.D. California · Apr 10, 2014

Coleman v. Brown, 938 F.Supp.2d at 979 . … Coleman v. Brown, 938 F.Supp.2d at 972 n. 30.

Coleman v. Brown

922 F. Supp. 2d 1004 · District Court, E.D. California · Apr 11, 2013

The first, Coleman v. Brown, began in 1990 and concerns California’s failure to provide constitutionally adequate mental health care to its mentally ill prison population. The second, Plata v. … All filings in this Three-Judge Court are included in the individual docket sheets of both Plata v. Brown, No. C01-1351 TEH (N.D.Cal.), and Coleman v. Brown, No. 90-cv-520-LKK (E.D.Cal.).

Haskell v. Brown

677 F. Supp. 2d 1187 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 23, 2009

See Norman-Bloodsaw v. … See Banks v.

Valdivia v. Brown

956 F. Supp. 2d 1125 · District Court, E.D. California · Jul 3, 2013

Brown, No. 2:90-cv-0520-LKK-JFM (E.D.Cal.) (ECF No. 4662) and Plata v. Brown, No. 3:01-01351-TEH (N.D.Cal.) (ECF No. 2659). … Brown, No. 2:90-cv-0520-LKK-JFM (E.D.Cal.) and Plata v. Brown, No. 3:01-01351-TEH (N.D.Cal.).

Koller v. Brown

224 F. Supp. 3d 871 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 16, 2016

(quoting McPherson v. … See Leiva-Perez v.

Brown v. Ruckelshaus

364 F. Supp. 258 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 7, 1973

If sustained on the merits, Congressman Brown and Los Angeles would fall within the exception we note here. Campaign Clean Water v. Ruckelshaus, 361 F.Supp. 689 (E.D.Va.1973); City of New York v. … Gravel v. Laird, 347 F.Supp. 7, 9 (D.C.D.C.1972); cf. Muskrat v. United States, 219 U.S. 346 , 31 S.Ct. 250 , 55 L.Ed. 246 (1911). Congressman Brown’s class action allegation also must fail.

Chote v. Brown

342 F. Supp. 1353 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 9, 1972

Georgia Socialist Workers Party v. Fortson, 315 F.Supp. 1035 (N.D.Ga. 1970); Jenness v. Little, 306 F.Supp. 925 (N.D.Ga.1969) 1 and, specifically, upon Carter v. … In Haag v.

Sassman v. Brown

73 F. Supp. 3d 1241 · District Court, E.D. California · Oct 14, 2014

See U.S. v. … Co. v.

Brown v. Rison

673 F. Supp. 1505 · District Court, C.D. California · Nov 25, 1987

Finnerty v. Cowen, 508 F.2d 979, 982-83 (2nd Cir.1974); Green v. Nelson, 442 F.Supp. 1047, 1052 (D.Conn.1977). … Vance v. Bradley, 440 U.S. at 94 n. 1, 99 S.Ct. at 941 n. 1. 6 .

Haskell v. Brown

317 F. Supp. 3d 1095 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 22, 2018

Rise v. … (citing Gerstein v.

Rising v. Brown

313 F. Supp. 824 · District Court, C.D. California · Jun 1, 1970

Plaintiff John V. Tunney and defendant George E. Brown, Jr. are congressmen from near adjoining .districts in California. … They rely upon Massachusetts v. Mellon, Frothingham v.

Sigmond v. Brown

645 F. Supp. 243 · District Court, C.D. California · Oct 15, 1986

Plaintiff claims that by filing the complaint, Shearer intended to influence the Board so that it would revoke plaintiff’s license. The Board eventually dismissed the complaint against plaintiff. … Enterprise In United States v.

Brown v. Harris

491 F. Supp. 845 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 28, 1980

See Affidavits of Rosa Gamez and Doris Brown. There is no need for the Court to embark on a detailed examination of legislative history and intent. The language of the statute is clear and definite. … Manhattan General Equipment Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 297 U.S. 129, 134 , 56 S.Ct. 397, 400 , 80 L.Ed. 528 (1936). See also Dixon v.

Toensing v. Brown

374 F. Supp. 191 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 25, 1974

See Insley v. … Brown retired effective January, 1972; Gail Gordon retired effective February, 1972; Dave Williams and' Alfred A. Figone retired effective June, 1972.

Coleman v. Brown

952 F. Supp. 2d 901 · District Court, E.D. California · Jun 20, 2013

Brown v. Plata, — U.S.-, -, 131 S.Ct. 1910, 1947 , 179 L.Ed.2d 969 (2011). … All filings in this Three-Judge Court are included in the individual docket sheets of both Plata v. Brown, No. C01-1351 TEH (N.D.Cal.), and Coleman v. Brown, No. 90-cv-520-LKK (E.D.Cal.).