Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersFDAL

6,212 results

1.03s

  • Brown v. BOARD OF SCH. COM'RS OF MOBILE CTY., ALA.

    542 F. Supp. 1078 · District Court, S.D. Alabama · Apr 15, 1982

    School boards in the South were acutely aware of the Brown v. … This court previously found, Brown v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Utilities Board, City of Daphne, Ala

    District Court, S.D. Alabama · Nov 30, 2017

    Brown’s objection attempts to show that the Board didn’t follow the correct process and harassed Brown when she was trying to do her job. … Third, Brown objects to the finding that the Board “determined outsourcing would result in a considerable savings to Defendant Utilities Board.”

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Brown v. Utilities Board, City of Daphne, Ala

    District Court, S.D. Alabama · Nov 8, 2017

    Plaintiff Brown brought six counts against Defendant Utilities Board: Count One alleges Defendant Utilities Board retaliated against Plaintiff Brown, in violation of Title VII of Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended … Plaintiff Brown’s Employment with Defendant Utilities Board In 1995, Plaintiff Brown began her employment with Defendant Utilities Board. (Doc. 48-1, at 31).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Huntsville City Board of Education v. Brown

    379 F. Supp. 1092 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Jul 15, 1974

    Le-Roy Brown, State Superintendent of Education for Alabama, determined pursuant to his statutory authority under Title I that plaintiff Huntsville City Board of Education was entitled to $657,034.00 of the federal allocation … See, e. g., Oestereich v. Selective Service System, 393 U.S. 233 , 89 S.Ct. 414 , 21 L.Ed.2d 402 (1968); Walsh v. Local Board No. 10, 305 F.Supp. 1274 (D.C.N.Y.1967); Armendariz v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Industrial Development Board of Prattville v. Brown & Root, Inc.

    99 F.R.D. 58 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Aug 12, 1983

    Defendant Brown and Root, Inc., was the general contractor that installed the machine at the mill. … See, Ketona Chemical Corp. v. Globe Indemnity Co., 404 F.2d 181 (5th Cir.1968). See, also, Sanders v. Liberty Mutual Ins.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Zachry v. Brown

    299 F. Supp. 1360 · District Court, N.D. Alabama · Jun 30, 1967

    Alabama State Board of Education, 294 F.2d 150 (5th Cir. 1961). … On its facts this case is clearly distinguishable from Ferrell v.

    Cited 45 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Gardner

    249 F. Supp. 968 · District Court, N.D. Alabama · Dec 30, 1965

    Brown, brings this action pursuant to the provisions of Section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, as amended, [ 42 U.S.C.A. § 405 (g)], to have this court review a final adverse decision of the Secretary of Health, Education

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Charles v. Brown

    495 F. Supp. 862 · District Court, N.D. Alabama · Sep 4, 1980

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Mendel

    864 F. Supp. 1138 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Sep 7, 1994

    Lanza v. … In Abbott v.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Wells Ex Rel. National Labor Relations Board v. Brown & Root, Inc.

    65 F. Supp. 2d 1264 · District Court, S.D. Alabama · Aug 4, 1999

    First, the Court should determine whether the Board had reasonable cause to believe that Brown & Root committed labor violations. 1 Second, the Court must address whether an injunction is just and proper. Arlook v. S. … Brown v. Swann, 35 U.S. (10 Pet.) 497, 503 , 9 L.Ed. 508 (1836).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Malladi v. Brown

    987 F. Supp. 893 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Dec 1, 1997

    Garcia v. … Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 295 , 99 S.Ct. 1705, 1714 , 60 L.Ed.2d 208 (1979).

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Moore

    428 F. Supp. 1123 · District Court, S.D. Alabama · Dec 13, 1976

    Regester, 412 U.S. 755 , 93 S.Ct. 2332 , 37 L.Ed.2d 314 (1973), and Zimmer v. McKeithen, 485 F.2d 1297 (5th Cir. 1973) (en banc), aff’d, sub nom East Carroll Parish School Board v. … [I]t must also be borne in mind that this school board ignored for nine years the requirement clearly stated in Brown that the School authorities have the primary responsibility for solving this *1131 constitutional problem

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Boglin v. Bd. of Trs. of Ala. Agric. & Mech. Univ.

    290 F. Supp. 3d 1257 · District Court, N.D. Alabama · Feb 6, 2018

    However, it is well established that the boards governing state universities in Alabama are considered arms of the state for Eleventh Amendment purposes. See, e.g. , Lassiter v. Ala. … . 1994) ; Harden v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Monroe v. Brown

    307 F. Supp. 2d 1268 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Mar 9, 2004

    McDougle v. Shaddrix, 534 So.2d 228, 231 (Ala.1988). B. Did Brown Act Consciously? … In Hughes v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Hester v. Brown

    512 F. Supp. 2d 1228 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · May 25, 2007

    .”); Yanez v. … V.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Benefield

    757 F. Supp. 2d 1165 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Sep 29, 2010

    Plaintiffs Angela Brown, Marcus Brown, and two minors T.B., and Z.W. (collectively, the Plaintiffs) sued Defendants Ronnie Benefield, R.C. … Plaintiffs Angela Brown, Marcus Brown, T.B., and Z.W. were at home when the deputies entered.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Sasser

    128 F. Supp. 2d 1345 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Dec 21, 2000

    Gasoline Marketers, Inc., 184 F.R.D. 414, 416 (M.D.Ala.1999); see also Beighley v. Federal Deposit Ins. … Div. of Knight-Ridder Newspapers, Inc. v. Ferre, 606 F.Supp. 122 (S.D.Fla.1984) (filing answer and affirmative defenses not clear intent to waive removal rights); Rose v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Williamson

    134 F. Supp. 2d 1286 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Mar 19, 2001

    Brown and Vera M. Brown (collectively “Plaintiffs”) on February 12, 2001. Both motions came' under submission on receipt of Defendants’ Reply supporting dismissal and opposing amendment on February 20, 2001. … In Texas v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Barnhart

    325 F. Supp. 2d 1265 · District Court, N.D. Alabama · Jul 12, 2004

    Holt v. Sullivan, 921 F.2d 1221, 1223 (11th Cir.1991). See also Elam v. Railroad Retirement Board, 921 F.2d 1210, 1215 (11th Cir.1991); Lamb v. Bowen, 847 F.2d 698, 702 (11th Cir.1988); Hand v. … Cannon v. Bowen, 858 F.2d 1541, 1545 (11th Cir.1988); Hale , at 1011; MacGregor, at 1054. Brown v. Sullivan, 921 F.2d at 1236. Nothing in the record documents an improvement in plaintiffs condition.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Monroe v. Brown

    256 F. Supp. 2d 1292 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Apr 7, 2003

    Plaintiffs claim that defendants negligently and wantonly caused Brown’s motor vehicle to collide with Mrs. Monroe’s. Mrs. … In Davis v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.