Case law

Brown v. Fletcher

244 F. 854 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 20, 1917

Supp. 774 , and Brown v. Robinson, 173 App. Div. 583 , 160 N. Y. Supp. 287 . At the time this loan was secured Braker was in a fit condition for imposition. … Miller v. Zeimer, 111 N. Y. 441 , 18 N. E. 716 ; Thompson v. Berry, 3 Johns. Ch. 395 .

Harris v. Brown

470 F. Supp. 250 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · May 22, 1979

If pregnancy is the only medical condition which is disqualifying for retention in the service, the resignation will be accepted without processing by a medical board or physical evaluation board . c. … In Jackson v.

Eubanks v. Brown

604 F. Supp. 141 · District Court, W.D. Kentucky · Sep 11, 1984

In City of Akron v. … In Planned Parenthood v.

Brown v. Williams

399 F. Supp. 2d 558 · District Court, D. Delaware · Nov 21, 2005

(D.I. 28 at ¶ 3-4) Plaintiff also contends that on February 25, 2003, while washing his clothes in the sink, the water turned his sock “brown and blu[ish] green.” … (D.I. 8 at ¶ 9) Plaintiff continued to drink from his cell sink and claims to have seen brown and greenish blue spots on his cup after doing so. (Id., ex.

Lukens v. Brown

368 F. Supp. 1340 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jan 3, 1974

In Smiley v. … The statement required in § 3517.10 was to be filed with the Board of Elections of Butler County. 2 .

McLean v. Brown

16 F. Cas. 246 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jul 1, 1871

Brown v. Apfel

991 F. Supp. 166 · District Court, W.D. New York · Jan 14, 1998

See also, Gonzalez v. … Pietrunti v.

United States v. Brown

56 F.2d 659 · District Court, W.D. Washington · Nov 20, 1931

Tiberg v. Warren (C. C. A.) 192 F. 458 ; see, also, United States v. Dembowski (D. C.) 252 F. 894 ; Bridgeman v. United States (C. C. A.) 140 F. 577 ; see, also, Crain v. United States, 162 U. S. 625 , 16 S. … See Bridgeman v. United States, supra.

Thomas v. Brown

513 F. Supp. 2d 1124 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 21, 2006

See Sass v. California Board of Prison Terms, 461 F.3d 1123, 1126-27 (9th Cir.2006). DISCUSSION A. … See Sass, 461 F.3d at 1127-28 ; Board of Pardons v. Allen, 482 U.S. 369 , 107 S.Ct. 2415 , 96 L.Ed.2d 303 (1987); Greenholtz v. Inmates of Nebraska Penal & Corr.

Freedman v. Brown

38 F. Supp. 662 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · May 1, 1941

The referee had the inestimable advantage of seeing and hearing them and I cannot find any evidence of a mistake or of a miscarriage of justice. 2 Collier on Bankruptcy, 14th Ed., Section 39. 28, pp. 1499, 1500; Sternburg v.

Brown v. Xerox Corp.

170 F. Supp. 3d 518 · District Court, W.D. New York · Mar 21, 2016

In Littlejohn v. … See Rojas v.

Brown v. Lee

19 F. 630 · District Court, N.D. Mississippi · Mar 12, 1884

defendants, and that there cannot be united in one action a count against two or more, and in the same action a count against one of the defendants; and the high court of errors and appeals of the state, in the case of Miller v.

United States v. Brown

274 F. Supp. 561 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 18, 1967

A Quantity of Copies of Books, supra; Marcus, supra; Kingsley Books, Inc. v. Brown, 354 U.S. 436 , 77 S.Ct. 1325 , 1 L.Ed.2d 1469 (1957). … These guidelines first appeared in Kingsley Books, Inc. v. Brown, supra. In Kingsley, the Supreme Court upheld New York’s civil anti-obscenity procedure against an attack based on First Amendment principles.

Notinger v. Brown

2009 DNH 043 · District Court, D. New Hampshire · Mar 31, 2009

Notinger v . Brown 08-CV-005-SM 03/31/09 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Steven M . … Notinger, Trustee in Bankruptcy of David Deaver Brown and Simply Media, Inc., Plaintiff v.

Brown v. Barnhart

325 F. Supp. 2d 1265 · District Court, N.D. Alabama · Jul 12, 2004

Holt v. Sullivan, 921 F.2d 1221, 1223 (11th Cir.1991). See also Elam v. Railroad Retirement Board, 921 F.2d 1210, 1215 (11th Cir.1991); Lamb v. Bowen, 847 F.2d 698, 702 (11th Cir.1988); Hand v. … Cannon v. Bowen, 858 F.2d 1541, 1545 (11th Cir.1988); Hale , at 1011; MacGregor, at 1054. Brown v. Sullivan, 921 F.2d at 1236. Nothing in the record documents an improvement in plaintiffs condition.

Brown v. McCormick

87 F. Supp. 2d 467 · District Court, D. Maryland · Mar 7, 2000

See Brown v. McCormick, 23 F.Supp.2d 594 (D.Md.1998). The Court adopts the reasoning stated in that opinion. 25. … Microsoft Corp. v. Grey Computer, 910 F.Supp. 1077, 1091 (D.Md.1995); see also N.A.S Import, Corp. v.

Morley v. Brown

605 F. Supp. 1468 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Apr 5, 1985

Reply to Memorandum of Defendant Harold Brown Regarding Applicability of 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (d) in this Action, at 10. … Id. at 273-74 (quoting Brown v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 747 F.2d 878, 883 (3d Cir.1984)).

Kebe v. Brown

161 F. Supp. 2d 634 · District Court, D. Maryland · Sep 12, 2001

In United States v. … However, in a 1990 case, Alabama v.

United States v. Brown

151 F. Supp. 441 · District Court, E.D. Virginia · Jan 8, 1957

McFarland knew nothing of the contemplated raid by the city officers but was investigating the status of a forfeiture proceeding involving an automobile registered in the name of James Brown, 606 E. … United States v. Hinton, 7 Cir., 219 F.2d 324 ; United States v. Diange, D.C., 32 F.Supp. 994 . Reliance by the Government upon Malacrauis v.

Brown v. Marsh

707 F. Supp. 21 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 9, 1989

In McKenzie v. Kennickell, 669 F.Supp. 529 (D.D.C.1987), and in Jurgens v. … Brown’s fee application is adequately supported; the Army’s opposition is not. See NAACP v.