Case law

Brown v. Scafidi

839 F. Supp. 342 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 20, 1993

Barnhart v. Grantham, 197 Pa. 502 , 47 A. 866 (1901); Kerr v. Clements, 148 Pa.Super. 378 , 25 A.2d 737 (1942); Kine v. Forman, 205 Pa.Super. 305 , 209 A.2d 1 (1965); Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. … (quoting Kerr v. Clements, 148 Pa.Super. 378, 384 , 25 A.2d 737, 740 (1942)). Mr. Brown, on the other hand, contends that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court rejected the fraud exception in Novic v.

Brown v. Tomlinson

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 28, 2009

BROWN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) … Civil Action No. 03-1376 (PLF) ) BROADCASTING BOARD OF GOVERNORS, ) ) Defendant. ) _______________________

Partenza v. Brown

14 F. Supp. 2d 493 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 31, 1998

Jasper Brown, who is the President of Local 277, IBT, AFL — CIO, was installed as an Executive Board member on October 12,1993, and was appointed by the Executive Board to be a Trustee on November 9, 1993. 28. … On February 26,1998, the Board approved a motion to remove Brown, LeFevre, Levine, Silvera, *498 and Martin as Trustees and appointed plaintiffs in their stead. 36.

Brown v. Schubert

389 F. Supp. 281 · District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · Jan 27, 1975

Perhaps this is because the facts of the case at bar are so similar to those which gave rise to the recent pronouncements of the Supreme Court in Procunier v. … The parties have stipulated that the “defendant Schubert . acted in good faith with respect to the plaintiffs Howland and Brown during the periods pertinent hereto.”

Brown v. Day

477 F. Supp. 2d 1110 · District Court, D. Kansas · Feb 28, 2007

Monroe v. … Hart v.

Brown v. Neeb

523 F. Supp. 1 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jul 3, 1980

This decree is essentially identical to the consent decree in Sarabia, et al., v. Duck, et al., Case No. C 72-263, which is quoted in the case of Sarabia v. … But by the same token, those entities cannot avoid complying with orders this Court had the power to make by saying that they will use mechanical processes such as “across-the-board reductions” or “neutral seniority systems

Brown v. Reaves

294 F. Supp. 858 · District Court, W.D. Louisiana · Dec 29, 1966

Of import here is the sequence of events: (1) On January 27, 1964 Brown registered with local Board No. 26, Hot Springs, Arkansas. … McCollum v. Board of Education, 333 U.S. 203 , 68 S.Ct. 461 , 92 U.Ed. 649, wherein it is stated: “Separation means separation, not something less.

Brown v. Conner

63 F. Supp. 315 · District Court, S.D. Texas · May 7, 1943

Brown v. Callahan

979 F. Supp. 1357 · District Court, D. Kansas · Sep 4, 1997

Brown must show that the balancing of the harms to each party weighs in his favor. See United States v. Theos, 709 F.Supp. 1007, 1011 (D.Colo. 1989). … Brown must show that the preliminary injunction would not be adverse to the public interest. Kansas Hospital Ass’n v. Whiteman, 835 F.Supp. 1556, 1565 (D.Kan.1993), aff'd by Williams v.

Brown v. Naccari

160 B.R. 784 · District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Oct 13, 1993

“Jim” Brown, Commissioner of Insurance for the State of Louisiana as Liquidator of Colonial Lloyds (Commissioner), appeals the denial of his “Motion to Extend Time for Objection to Discharge”. 1 For the following reasons, … See Recile v. Ward, 496 F.2d 675 (5th Cir.1974), In re Abrams, 35 B.R. 485 (Bankr.N.D.Ohio 1983).

Banks v. Brown

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 30, 2009

District and Benkruptcy Courts UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Simon Banks, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. § C1v1l Act1on No. w 8 Devon Brown, Director, D.C.

Brown v. Coughlin

965 F. Supp. 401 · District Court, W.D. New York · May 27, 1997

The fact that Brown had made an administrative complaint, as opposed to filing a lawsuit, is of no consequence. In Franco v. … (quoting Morello v. James, 810 F.2d 344, 347 (2d Cir.1987)). I also note that Knapp filed a misbehavior report about Brown on July 18, 1993, the same day that he and Curren allegedly threatened Brown.

Brown v. Henderson

155 F. Supp. 2d 502 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Dec 14, 2000

Board of Supervisors of L.S.U., 715 F.2d 971 (5th Cir.1983) (creating a three-factor test including whether the harassing act should trigger an employee’s awareness of and duty to assert her rights) with Morgan v. … Brown v. Perry 184 F.3d 388, 396 (4th Cir.1999). Defendant had such a policy.

Simmons v. Brown

497 F. Supp. 173 · District Court, D. Maryland · Jul 15, 1980

E. g., Diliberti v. Brown, 583 F.2d 950, 952 (7th Cir. 1978); Knehans v. Alexander, 566 F.2d 312, 314 (D.C. Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 995 , 98 S.Ct. 1646 , 56 L.Ed.2d 83 (1978); Sims v. … E. g., Knehans v. Alexander, 566 F.2d at 314 ; Sims v. Fox, 505 F.2d at 862-63 ; benShalom v. Secretary of the Army, 489 F.Supp. at 971-72 . See generally Diliberti v. Brown, 583 F.2d at 952 .

Brown v. Davis

13 F.2d 256 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · May 22, 1926

Judson v. Maccabees (D. C.) 220 F. 1004 . It would be wrong to hold that defendant lost his right to remove, because he saved to the plaintiff the trouble, expense, and delay of bringing him compulsorily into court. … Stevens v. Richardson (C. C.) 9 F. 191 . In view of the foregoing, the court must hold that defendant did not waive his right to remove, and that Ms proceeding in that regard was seasonably and timely taken.

Brown v. Hughes

136 F. Supp. 55 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 4, 1955

James Brown, injured while riding in the Neary car, then by his parent and natural guardian filed the present action against the administratrix, the summons and complaint being served by the United States Marshal by registered … See Robertson v. Railroad Labor Board, 268 U.S. 619 , at page 622, 45 S.Ct. 621 , 69 L.Ed. 1119 . 18 . Cf. Aversa v. Aubry, 1931, 303 Pa. 139 , 154 A. 311 , where such a circumstance was not considered important. 19 .

Brown v. Hawaii

679 F. Supp. 2d 1188 · District Court, D. Hawaii · Sep 23, 2009

Brown v. Chinen (“Brown I”), Civ. No. 07-00556 ACK-LEK, 2008 WL 2073496 , 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39659 (D.Haw. May 14, 2009). … Brown v. Hawai‘i (“Brown II”), Civ. No. 07-00556 ACK-LEK, 2009 WL 330209 , 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10546 (D.Haw. Feb. 10, 2009). The Court again granted Plaintiff leave to amend.

Brown v. Slayton

337 F. Supp. 10 · District Court, W.D. Virginia · Dec 15, 1971

. § 53-275, Cook v. Commonwealth, 211 Va. 290 , 176 S.E.2d 815 (1970), and to be represented by counsel, Hewett v. North Carolina, 415 F.2d 1316 (4th Cir. 1969); Mempa v. … Williams v. Peyton, 414 F.2d 776 (4th Cir. 1969); Skipper v. Cox, 320 F.Supp. 934 (W.D.Va.1970).

Brown v. Israel

449 F. Supp. 1029 · District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · May 17, 1978

Holmes v. State, 63 Wis.2d 389 , 217 N.W.2d 657 (1974). … Brown had the intent to commit first degree murder, thereby relieving the prosecution of its burden to prove all essential elements of the crime of first degree murder. Hughes v.

Brown v. Wilson

373 F. Supp. 1045 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 26, 1974

Since Plaintiff Brown did not have sufficient funds to obtain an attorney to represent him, Mr. Wilson would present his (Brown’s) case for commutation before the Board of Pardons. … One of these prisoners was Joseph Carl Brown, Jr. Shortly before the meeting of the Board occurred, I received a letter from Mrs. Bette Cavanah on behalf of Joseph Carl Brown, Jr.