Case law

NATIONAL ASS'N OF WATERFRONT EMPLOYERS v. Solis

665 F. Supp. 2d 10 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 27, 2009

See Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 302-03 , 99 S.Ct. 1705 , 60 L.Ed.2d 208 (1979). … In August of 2007, the Benefits Review Board instituted its own rule requiring that decisions and orders issued by the Board use claimants’ initials. 4 .

Brown v. Regan

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 16, 2022

Brown v. Echeveria-Burkes, No. 21-cv-3013, ECF No. 4 at 1. … Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002).

Ruiz v. Vilsack

763 F. Supp. 2d 168 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 9, 2011

Welcome Ctr. v. … Guillen v.

Hawks v. Jones

105 F. Supp. 2d 718 · District Court, E.D. Michigan · Jun 15, 2000

Whittington v. Milby, 928 F.2d 188, 193 (6th Cir.1991); Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591 (6th Cir.1989). … See Whittington v. Milby, supra; Wells v. Brown, supra. As the Wells court explained, [T]he face of a complaint must indicate whether a plaintiff seeks to recover damages from the defendants directly.... See Nix {v.

Orlowski v. Bates

146 F. Supp. 3d 908 · District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Nov 18, 2015

Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir.1989). III. … Lopez v. Taylor, 195 S.W.3d 627, 634 (Tenn.Ct.App.2005), (citing Brown v. Birman Managed Care, Inc., 42 S.W.3d 62, 66 (Tenn.2001)).

Doe v. Christie

33 F. Supp. 3d 518 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 31, 2014

Pickup v. Brown, 740 F.3d at 1235 (quoting Fields v. Palmdale Sch. … King v. Christie, 981 F.Supp.2d at 333 (citing Brown v. City of Pittsburgh, 586 F.3d 263 , 284 n. 24 (3d Cir.2009)). Plaintiffs here have offered nothing additional in support of such a claim.

Thorp v. District of Columbia

142 F. Supp. 3d 132 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 5, 2015

Comm’rs of Bryan Cnty., Okl. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 407 (1997). … Brown v. Argenbright Sec., Inc., 782 A.2d 752, 757 (D.C. 2001) (quoting Boykin v.

Huron Valley Hospital, Inc. v. City of Pontiac

466 F. Supp. 1301 · District Court, E.D. Michigan · Mar 2, 1979

In New Motor Vehicle Board v. Orrin W. … The regulation is therefore outside the reach of the antitrust laws under the “state action” exemption. — U.S. at —, 99 S.Ct. at 412 , citing Parker v. Brown, supra; Bates v.

Shorter v. Champion Home Builders Co.

776 F. Supp. 333 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Sep 16, 1991

In Brown v. Malket Developers, 41 Ohio Misc. 57 , 322 N.E.2d 367 (1974), the court held that the statute was applicable against an Ohio supplier even though the consumer was not from Ohio. … Also, in Brown v. Liberty Clubs, 45 Ohio St.3d 191 , 543 N.E.2d 783 (1989), the court found an Indiana seller liable to an Ohio consumer under the Act.

United States v. Cooper

279 F. Supp. 253 · District Court, D. Colorado · Feb 14, 1968

See, e. g., Brown v. State of Louisiana, 383 U.S. 131, 142 , 86 S.Ct. 719 , 15 L.Ed.2d 637 (1966) (sit-in); Carlson v. … Thus, in Cox v.

Bryant

District Court, N.D. California · Jan 7, 2026

v. … Board of Education].”) (cleaned up). The chilling effect is particularly concerning where the case raises issues of public importance, as Bryant’s does. See Hunter v.

Lutes v. Goldin

62 F. Supp. 2d 118 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 30, 1999

Defendant now cites to Brown v. … The rationale in Brown has been extended to the ADEA as well. Thorne v. Cavazos, 744 F.Supp. 348, 351-52 (D.D.C.1990). 19 .

Brown v. Vitelcom, Inc.

47 F. Supp. 2d 595 · District Court, Virgin Islands · Apr 26, 1999

s directors, Neil Prior and Jeffrey Prosser, also sat on Vitelcom's corporate board. … ATN Inc. and Vitelcom's corporate boards had two directors in common, Neil Prior and Jeffrey Prosser, who apparently owned 60% of both companies.

American Federation of Government Employees, Local 1841 v. United States Department of Defense

682 F. Supp. 479 · District Court, D. Nevada · Mar 30, 1988

Columbia Power Trades Council v. United States Dep’t of Energy, 671 F.2d 325 (1982); National Fed’n of Fed. Employees, Local 1263 v. Commandant, Defense Language Inst., 493 F.Supp. 675 (N.D.Cal.1980). … Brown, 680 F.2d 722 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1104 , 103 S.Ct. 728 , 74 L.Ed.2d 952 (1983), and Local 2855, AFGE v. United States, 602 F.2d 574 (3d Cir.1979).

United States v. Grote

629 F. Supp. 2d 1201 · District Court, E.D. Washington · Jun 16, 2009

He inspected the contents of the brown paper bag and found that it contained a full, unopened bottle of vodka. … United States v. Ortiz, 714 F.Supp. 1569, 1577-80 (C.D.Cal.1989), affirmed without opinion sub nom. in United States v. Valenzuela, 899 F.2d 19 (9th Cir.1990); United States v.

BIO-TEC ENVIRONMENTAL, LLC v. Adams

792 F. Supp. 2d 1208 · District Court, D. New Mexico · May 31, 2011

BROWNING, District Judge. … Thompson v. THI of N.M. at Casa Arena, No. CIV 05-1331 JB/LCS, 2008 WL 5999653 , at *14-15 (D.N.M. Dec. 24, 2008) (Browning, J.)

Romco, Ltd. v. Outdoor Aluminum, Inc.

725 F. Supp. 1033 · District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · Oct 20, 1989

University of Health Sciences/The Chicago Medical School, 710 F.2d 351, 357 (7th Cir.1983); Ranyard v. Board of Regents, 708 F.2d 1235, 1238 (7th Cir.1983). … Id. at 845 , quoting United Carolina Bank v.

Uffner v. Philip Morris USA Inc.

46 F. Supp. 3d 1339 · District Court, M.D. Florida · Sep 22, 2014

Carter v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 778 So.2d 932, 937 (Fla.2000) (internal punctuation and quotation marks omitted). … For a detailed history of the Engle litigation, see Brown v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 611 F.3d 1324, 1326-29 (11th Cir.2010) and Waggoner v. RJ. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 835 F.Supp.2d 1244 (M.D.Fla. 2011). .

Brown v. Paulson

541 F. Supp. 2d 379 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 1, 2008

v. … Hardison v. Alexander, 655 F.2d 1281, 1288 (D.C.Cir.1981); see also Allen, 449 U.S. at 94 , 101 S.Ct. 411 . In the previous action filed by counsel on May 22, 2003 (Brown v.

Valentini v. Shinseki

860 F. Supp. 2d 1079 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 16, 2012

Story acknowledges that the Library of Congress Trust Fund Board was authorized to accept donations in trust. Story, 184 F.2d at 455 . And in United States v. … See, e.g., Beamon v. Brown, 125 F.3d 965, 974 (6th Cir.1997). In the absence of controlling authority from the United States Supreme Court or the Ninth Circuit, the Court is convinced by the reasoning in Broudy . .