Case law

Norris Ex Rel. Norris v. Board of Education

797 F. Supp. 1452 · District Court, S.D. Indiana · May 1, 1992

Board of Comm’rs of Hendricks County v. King, 481 N.E.2d 1327, 1331 (Ind.Ct.App.1985). … Austin v. Brown Local School Dist., 746 F.2d 1161, 1164 (6th Cir.1984).

Western Maryland RR. v. System Board of Adjustment

465 F. Supp. 963 · District Court, D. Maryland · Jan 23, 1979

Reynolds, the General Chairman of BRAC System Board No. 6, acknowledged that the provisions of the “scope rule” covering the BRAC represented employees of the plaintiff railroads is “closer to reaching the goal” of the changes … In Boys Markets v.

Brown v. Bihm

District Court, W.D. Louisiana · Dec 6, 2023

Laney attended the meeting with Brown.1 After that meeting, it was determined that Brown should be moved out of the general population and into a more secure housing unit.2 Disgruntled by the move, Brown staged a four-day … Brown alleges that “bad blood” previously existed with Mike-Mike and Brown, and “Plaintiff [was] given to understand that Mike-Mike is/was listed in [Brown’s] enemy jacket.5 Defendant, Bihm, acting on instructions from

Nixon v. Autauga County Board of Education

273 F. Supp. 2d 1292 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Jul 29, 2003

Nixon also identified Charles Brown (hereinafter “Brown”) as being a driver who was paid an additional $15/day for transporting students to the Alternative School. … Accord, Miranda v.

Liberty Paper Board Co. v. United States

37 F. Supp. 751 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 31, 1941

For additional authority the court relies upon Hornell Ice & Cold Storage Co. v. United States, D.C., 32 F.Supp. 468 ; Midvale Paper Board Co., Inc., v. United States, D.C., 31 F.Supp. 851 ; Kentucky Fire Brick Co. v. … Co. v. United States, D.C., 34 F.Supp. 963 ; Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. v. Jones, Collector of Internal Revenue (Stanolind Pipe Line Co. v. Jones, Collector of Internal Revenue, Stanolind *754 Crude Oil Purchasing Co. v.

Brown v. Kijakazi

District Court, D. Maryland · Mar 24, 2022

(citing Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389, 401 (1971)); see also Hays, 907 F.2d at 1456 (quoting Laws v. … Shinaberry v.

Treadway Companies, Inc. v. Care Corp.

490 F. Supp. 668 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 16, 1980

Thereafter, Lieblich informed Browne that the board wanted Cowin removed and asked if he would fill the vacancy. Browne replied that he wanted Cowin to remain on the board. … See Swinney v. Keebler Co., supra; McDaniel v. Painter, supra; Brown v. Halbert, 271 Cal.App.2d 252 , 76 Cal.Rptr. 781 (1969). 26 .

Davis v. Brown

District Court, E.D. Michigan · Sep 7, 2021

Roberts v. … See Lee v. Jabe, 989 F.2d 869, 871 (6th Cir. 1993).

Anderson v. BOARD OF EDUC. OF FAYETTE COUNTY

616 F. Supp. 2d 662 · District Court, E.D. Kentucky · May 1, 2009

Wilson v. Garcia, 471 U.S. 261 , 105 S.Ct. 1938 , 85 L.Ed.2d 254 (1985) (§ 1983 claims); Lillard v. Shelby County Bd. of Educ., 76 F.3d 716 , 729 (6th Cir.1996) (Title IX claims); Bonner v. … See Munday v.

Deerfield Hutterian Ass'n v. Ipswich Board of Education

468 F. Supp. 1219 · District Court, D. South Dakota · Apr 17, 1979

The United States Supreme Court reiterated its position on what standards to apply in an equal protection case in Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. … Mortweet v. Ethan Board of Education, S.D., 241 N.W.2d 580 (1976), sets out the standard of review under South Dakota law.

Brown v. Scaglione

District Court, E.D. Michigan · Sep 30, 2021

Coffey v. Carroll, 933 F.3d 577, 588 (6th Cir. 2019) (citing Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386, 396–97(1989)). … In support, Defendants cite Kallstrom v.

Brown v. Trump

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Dec 22, 2020

Comm’rs of Bryan Cty., Okla. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 405 (1997). … See id. ¶ 20 (“Trump called for the removal of Rodney Brown.

Clark v. Brown

District Court, E.D. Michigan · Aug 24, 2021

See Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989). And neither the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation nor this Court’s order is based upon the failure to follow any technical rules. … Plaintiff cites to Fruit v.

State Board of Medical Examiners v. Uchin

9 N.J. Misc. 966 · United States District Court · May 1, 1931

Wester v. Hade, 52 Pa. St. 478; People v. Sherman, 100 N. Y. 351 . … Adams v. Lansdon 18 Idaho 483 .

Sale v. Waverly-Shell Rock Board of Education

390 F. Supp. 784 · District Court, N.D. Iowa · Jan 8, 1975

Diaz v. Pan Am. … La Fleur v. Cleveland Board of Education, 465 F.2d 1184 (6th Cir. 1972); Vineyard v. Hollister School District, supra. However, other judicial pronouncements have been to the contrary. C.W.A. v.

OPM - USA - Inc. v. Board of County Commissioners

7 F. Supp. 2d 1316 · District Court, M.D. Florida · Aug 26, 1997

BellSouth Mobility Inc. v. Gwinnett County, Georgia, 944 F.Supp. 923, 928 (N.D.Ga.1996) (quoting Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474, 477 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951)). … See, e.g., Illinois RSA No. 3, Inc. v. County of Peoria, 963 F.Supp. 732 (C.D.Ill. 1997); Western PCS II Corp. v. Extraterritorial Zoning Authority, 957 F.Supp. 1230 (D.N.M.1997); BellSouth, 944 F.Supp. 923 .

Brown v. Trump

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Dec 22, 2020

“baseless prosecutions against activists and protesters, including Rodney Brown”). … See, e.g., Whitt v. City of St.

Gadsden City Board of Education v. B.P.

3 F. Supp. 2d 1299 · District Court, N.D. Alabama · May 4, 1998

Dist. v. Raelee S., by and Through Heidi S., 96 F.3d 78 , 80 n. 1 (3rd Cir.1996), the “status quo provision,” J.B. v. Killingly Bd. of Educ., 990 F.Supp. 57, 68 (D.Conn.1997), or the. “stay-put provision” of the IDEA. … THE MOOTNESS ISSUE Pursuant to Honig v. Doe, the Board sought an injunction in the present case claiming that B.P. and L.H. were “substantially likely” to injure themselves or others. See id. at 328 , 108 S.Ct. at 606 .

Clark v. Brown

District Court, E.D. Michigan · Oct 4, 2021

BROWN, et al., Defendants. _______________________________/ … Indeed, Plaintiff cites to Maben v.

Bradley v. School Board of City of Richmond, Virginia

325 F. Supp. 828 · District Court, E.D. Virginia · Apr 5, 1971

When they assume the “reponsibility which Brown II placed squarely on the School Board,” Id., 442, 88 S.Ct. 1696 , courts will not presume to dictate a selection between equally effective desegregation plans. Wanner v. … Brewer v. School Board of City of Norfolk, supra; Allen v. Board of Public Instruction of Broward County, 432 F.2d 362, 365 (5th Cir. 1970); Hightower v. West, 430 F.2d 552, 558 (5th Cir. 1970); Clark v.