Case law

Black v. Brown

524 F. Supp. 856 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jun 29, 1981

Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539 , 94 S.Ct. 2963 , 41 L.Ed.2d 935 (1974); United States ex rel. Miller v. *858 Twomey, 479 F.2d 701 (7th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, Gutierrez v. … Black v. Brown, 513 F.2d 652 (7th Cir., 1981).

Brown v. Brough

248 F. Supp. 342 · District Court, D. Maryland · Dec 15, 1965

Points previously raised by petitioner and his able and tireless court-appointed attorney are discussed in Brown v. Pepersack, D.Md., 217 F.Supp. 547 (1963), aff’d, Brown v. … Pepersack, 4 Cir., 334 F.2d 9 (1964), cert. den., Brown v. Pepersack, 379 U.S. 917 , 85 S.Ct. 269 , 13 L.Ed.2d 188 (1964); Brown v. Brough, D.Md., March 23, 1965, unreported, aff’d, 4 Cir., Brown v.

Bertucci v. Brown

663 F. Supp. 447 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jun 8, 1987

Dahlberg v. … Powell v. Workmen’s Compensation Board, 327 F.2d 131 , 137 (2d Cir.1964). Vague and conclusory allegations of conspiracy are insufficient. Ostrer v. Aronwald, 567 F.2d 551, 552 (2d Cir.1977).

Owens v. Brown

455 F. Supp. 291 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 27, 1978

Co. v. Oregon, 223 U.S. 118 , 32 S.Ct. 224 , 56 L.Ed. 377 (1912); Luther v. … Califano v. Goldfarb, 430 U.S. 199 , 97 S.Ct. 1021 , 51 L.Ed.2d 270 (1977); Craig v. Boren, 429 U.S. 190 , 97 S.Ct. 451 , 50 L.Ed.2d 397 (1976); Stanton v.

Coar v. Brown

29 B.R. 806 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · May 5, 1983

Galt v. Libbey-Owens-Ford Glass Co., 376 F.2d 711, 714 (7th Cir.1967). … Johnson v. England, supra, 356 F.2d at 52 ; Bohack Corp. v.

Brown v. Astrue

789 F. Supp. 2d 470 · District Court, D. Delaware · May 19, 2011

INTRODUCTION Annemarie Brown (“plaintiff’) appeals from a decision of Michael J. … See Brown v. Astrue, 590 F.Supp.2d 669, 675-76 (D.Del.2008). A second ALJ conducted a hearing on October 15, 2009, at which plaintiff and independent VE Mitchell A. Schmidt (“Schmidt”) testified.

Brown v. Bernstein

49 F. Supp. 497 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 25, 1943

Brown, Administrator, Office of Price Administration, on March 17, 1943, secured in this Court an order upon the defendant requiring him to appear on March 22, 1943, or as soon thereafter as counsel could be heard, and *498 … Brown, has not brought this action in his own right but as an Officer of the Federal Government charged with enforcement of matters of National safety committed to his department, and any injury, loss or damage would be suffered

Brown v. Calamos

777 F. Supp. 2d 1128 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 14, 2011

Plaintiff Christopher Brown filed this action in Cook County Circuit Court on behalf of a class comprised of common shareholders of the Calamos Convertible Opportunities and Income Fund (the “Fund”). … See Felton v.

Brown v. Gray

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 4, 2011

Dlstnct & Bankru FCR THE DISTR1CT CF C()LUMBIA Courts for the District of Co|uiiif)i(a SHIRON BROWN, Plaintiff, v. : Civil Action No. ll 3 VINCENT GRAY, Defendant.

Brown v. McElroy

160 F. Supp. 2d 699 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 4, 2001

Plaintiff Osmond Brown (“Brown”) brings this pro se action alleging claims pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 , 91 S.Ct. 1999 , 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). … See Cuoco v. Moritsugu, 222 F.3d 99, 107 (2d Cir.2000).

Doe v. Brown Univ.

327 F. Supp. 3d 397 · District Court, D. Rhode Island · Aug 27, 2018

John subsequently complained to Brown about his encounter with Jane, but Brown brought no charges against her. A Student Conduct Board hearing took place in February 2014. … The Board issued a protective order so that John and Jane were not to have contact. 3 *405 The Board also imposed a sanction of a one-year deferred suspension against John.

Brown v. Selwin

250 F. Supp. 2d 299 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 24, 1999

v. … Estelle v.

Zupan v. Brown

5 F. Supp. 2d 792 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 23, 1998

The Fifth Circuit in McGrew v. … Y., 610 F.2d 449, 453 (6th Cir.1979) (to maintain a habeas action, petitioner must be “in custody” and that custody must be the result of respondent’s action from which petitioner seeks relief); Brown v.

Minatsis v. Brown

713 F. Supp. 1056 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · May 1, 1989

Elliot Co. v. Caribbean Utils. Co., 513 F.2d 1176, 1182 (6th Cir.1975), Ott v. … Escobar v. INS, 700 F.Supp. 609 (D.D.C.1988); Anetekhai v. INS, 685 F.Supp. 599 (E.D.La.1988); Smith v. INS, 684 F.Supp. 1113 (D.Mass.1988).

Brown v. Wainwright

459 F. Supp. 244 · District Court, M.D. Florida · Oct 12, 1978

Williams v. Florida, supra. … Brown, unless within sixty days from the date of this order the State of Florida accords petitioner a new trial and all attendant rights.

Brown v. O'BRIEN

624 F. Supp. 2d 136 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 1, 2009

Commonwealth v. Brown, 449 Mass. 1102 , 865 N.E.2d 1140 (2007) (table). … See Early v.

Hartman v. Knudsen

District Court, D. Montana · Jan 14, 2022

Abney v. United States, 431 U.S. 651, 660–61 (1977); see also, e.g., Dominguez v. Kernan, 906 F.3d 1127, 1132 n.7 (9th Cir. 2018); Brown v. Ahern, 676 F.3d 899, 901 (9th Cir. 2012); Stow v. … See Castille v. Peoples, 489 U.S. 346, 350 (1989) (discussing Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443, 447 (1953)). The requirement is also met if the petitioner presents the claim in an appeal as of right, see, e.g., Mont.

Welch v. Brown

907 F. Supp. 2d 1102 · District Court, E.D. California · Dec 3, 2012

{See Pickup v. Brown, Civ. No. 2:12-2497 KJM EFB (E.D.Cal.) Compl. H1Í2-6 (Docket No. 1).) … Brown v. Entm’t Merchants Ass’n, — U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 2729, 2738 , 180 L.Ed.2d 708 (2011).

Harceg v. Brown

536 F. Supp. 125 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Feb 26, 1982

Barrett v. Board of Commissioners of Cook County, 11 Ill.App.3d 666 , 297 N.E.2d 307 (1st Dist. 1973). … Barrett v. Board of Commissioners of Cook County, supra, designed to assure compensation commensurate with the special assistant’s assumption of a public function with due consideration for his overhead expenses.

Financial Resources Network, Inc. v. Brown & Brown, Inc.

930 F. Supp. 2d 287 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 14, 2013

Pending before this court is a third summary judgment motion filed by defendants American Guarantee and Liability Insurance Company (“American Guarantee”), Zurich North America Company (“Zurich”), Brown & Brown, Inc. … (“B & B”), Brown & Brown of California, Inc. (“BBC”) and Calsurance (collectively “defendants”). (Docket Entry # 119). They seek summary judgment on counts I, III, IV, V and VI in the first amended complaint.