Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.22s
371 F. Supp. 2d 332 · District Court, W.D. New York · May 13, 2005
People v. Brown, 274 A.D.2d at 941 , 710 N.Y.S.2d 504 (citing People v. Clements, 37 N.Y.2d 675, 684-685 , 376 N.Y.S.2d 480 , 339 N.E.2d 170 (1975); People v. … See People v. Brown, 274 A.D.2d at 941 , 710 N.Y.S.2d 504 (dissenting opinion) (citing People v. Ramos, 206 A.D.2d 260 , 613 N.Y.S.2d 870 (1st Dept.1994); People v.
Cited 2 timesPublished958 F. Supp. 70 · District Court, D. Connecticut · Mar 21, 1997
Mann v. … In Cort v.
Cited 7 timesPublished112 F. Supp. 2d 585 · District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Jul 18, 2000
On June 1,1999, the Louisiana Fourth Circuit found that the claims raised in Brown’s application for post-conviction relief were without merit. State v. Brown, No. 99-K-1136 (La.App. 4th Cir. … Brown’s subsequent request for writs from the Louisiana Supreme Court was unavailing. State ex rel. Brown v. State, 750 So.2d 983 (La.1999). The instant proceeding followed.
Cited 6 timesPublished105 F.R.D. 532 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Apr 3, 1985
In Walker v. … This distinction was discussed in Fischer v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Aug 6, 2012
.: 10-1791 (RC) : v. … Corp. v. Prodigy Partners Ltd., 2009 WL 3273920, at *1 (D.D.C. Oct. 9, 2009).
Cited 0 timesPublished955 F. Supp. 499 · District Court, D. Maryland · Feb 5, 1997
Brown v. E.F. *518 Hutton Group, Inc., 991 F.2d 1020, 1031 (2nd Cir.1993). Sophisticated investors have difficulty-establishing suitability claims. See, e.g., Xaphes v. … Brown were a controlling person. V Plaintiffs’ state law claims 72 A.
Cited 17 timesPublished341 F. Supp. 177 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 18, 1972
See also, Trop v. Dulles, 356 U.S. 86 , 78 S.Ct. 590 , 2 L.Ed.2d 630 (1958), infra; Wright v. McMann, 387 F.2d 519 (2d Cir. 1967). … The Court of Appeals of this Circuit, in Gittlemacker v.
Cited 5 timesPublished5 F. 31 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 15, 1880
Avery v. Slack, 17 Wend. 85 ; Thayer v. Lewis, 4 Den. 269 ; Sawyer v. Schoonmaker, 8 How. Pr. 198 ; Cox. v. R. Co. 61 Barb. 615 ; Bissell v. R. Co. 67 Barb. 385 , and cases cited. … McConn v. R. Co. 50 N. Y. 179 ; Miller v. Gages, 4 McLean, 436 . Others may affect a substantial right, and be, in fact, positive conditions to acquiring jurisdiction or to the legality of process.
Cited 6 timesPublished41 F. Supp. 2d 172 · District Court, N.D. New York · Feb 19, 1999
See Brown v. Middaugh, No. 96-CV-1097, 1998 WL 566791 (N.D.N.Y. Sep.3, 1998). … Aff. of James Brown at ¶4 .
Cited 19 timesPublished810 F. Supp. 644 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 12, 1993
See Smith v. … ); McNulty v.
Cited 8 timesPublished813 F. Supp. 1015 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 5, 1993
See Ramos v. Browning Ferris Industries, 103 N.J. 177 , 510 A.2d 1152, 1155 (1986) (contribution); Stephenson v. R.A. Jones & Co., Inc., 103 N.J. 194 , 510 A.2d 1161, 1163 (1986) (indemnification). Not surprisingly, Dr. … See Barkanic v.
Cited 6 timesPublished291 F. Supp. 1011 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 30, 1968
Greene v. McElroy, 360 U.S. 474 , 79 S.Ct. 1400 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1377 ; Brown v. Gamage, 126 U.S.App.D.C. 269 , 377 F.2d 154 . … (p. 87, 63 S.Ct. p. 459) See, also, Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Labor Board, 313 U.S. 177 , 61 S.Ct. 845 , 85 L.Ed. 1271 (1940).
Cited 5 timesPublished372 F. Supp. 2d 501 · District Court, E.D. Virginia · Jun 2, 2005
of room and board during that time. … Hansen v.
Cited 2 timesPublished348 F. Supp. 2d 533 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Nov 30, 2004
Harris v. Hutchinson, 209 F.3d 325, 330 (4th Cir.2000); see also Spencer v. Sutton, 239 F.3d 626 (4th Cir. *536 2001). … See Minter v. Beck, 230 F.3d 663 (4th Cir.2000) (federal habeas claim was time-barred when more than one year had elapsed from date of conviction until the petitioner filed his § 2254 petition).
Cited 6 timesPublished891 F. Supp. 2d 49 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 18, 2012
Brown v. Marsh, 777 F. 2d 8, 14 (D.C. Cir. 1985) (internal quotation marks omitted). … Compare Brown v. Georgetown Univ. Hosp. Medstar Health, 828 F. Supp. 2d 1, 7 (D.D.C. 2011) (claim of national origin discrimination preserves claim of racial discrimination) with Sisay v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., 34 F.
Cited 6 timesPublished483 F. Supp. 40 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Oct 17, 1979
Although courts have taken differing views on this question, compare Shong Ching Lau v. Change, 415 F.Supp. 627 (E.D.Pa.1976) and Color Technique, Inc. v. … We find applicable, however, the following analysis of § 1406(a) by the court in Mulcahy v.
Cited 5 timesPublished29 F.R.D. 184 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 11, 1961
Lyons v. Westinghouse Electric Corp., 16 F.R.D. 384 (S.D.N.Y. 1954), appeal dismissed, 222 F.2d 184 (2 Cir.1955), cert. denied 350 U.S. 825 , 76 S. Ct. 52 , 100 L.Ed. 737 (1955); Montro Corp. v. … Sagorsky v. Malyon, 12 F.R.D. 486 (S.D.N.Y.1952). Indeed, plaintiffs’ right to discovery appears to have been approved by Judge Herlands in his opinion denying defendants’ motion to dismiss, Brown v.
Cited 2 timesPublished572 F. Supp. 193 · District Court, D. Colorado · Oct 6, 1983
The complaint arises from the events surrounding the certification and short-term commitment of plaintiff Rose Brown in April of 1980. … Vitek v. Jones, 445 U.S. 480 , 100 S.Ct. 1254 , 63 L.Ed.2d 552 (1980); Addington v. Texas, 441 U.S. 418, 427 , 99 S.Ct. 1804, 1810 , 60 L.Ed.2d 323 (1979); O’Connor v.
Cited 10 timesPublished993 F. Supp. 918 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jan 21, 1998
See Nunnally v. MacCausland, 996 F.2d 1 (1st Cir.1993); Llewellyn v. Celanese Corp., 693 F.Supp. 369 (W.D.N.C.1988); and Moody v. Bayliner Marine Corp., 664 F.Supp. 232 (E.D.N.C.1987). … Compare Miller v. Runyon, 77 F.3d 189, 191-92 (7th Cir.)
Cited 4 timesPublished923 F. Supp. 2d 314 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 15, 2013
Brown, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 11-0277 … Order, ECF No. 13; see Brown v. Wilhelm, 819 F. Supp. 2d 41 (D.D.C. 2011). Pending before the Court is Wilhelm’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Mot.
Cited 2 timesPublished
Ask Donna