Case law

Kounelis v. Sherrer

529 F. Supp. 2d 503 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jan 3, 2008

Thus, having found that the alleged facts established the violation of a constitutional right and that the constitutional right was clearly established, the Court denied qualified immunity to Sergeants James and Perez. … established at the time of the alleged violation, the Court has limited its qualified immunity analysis to Kounelis's excessive force claim. 12 .

Boysen v. Peacehealth

District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 19, 2024

Defendants in a Section 1983 action are entitled to qualified immunity from damages for civil liability if their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person … For purposes of qualified immunity, “[a] right is clearly established when it is sufficiently clear that every reasonable official would have understood that what he is doing violates that right.” Rivas-Villegas v.

Carthew v. County of Suffolk

709 F. Supp. 2d 188 · District Court, E.D. New York · May 6, 2010

Thus, qualified immunity is warranted. … The doctrine of qualified immunity shields government officials from civil liability if their “conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.

BERK v. HOLLINGSWORTH

District Court, D. New Jersey · Nov 23, 2020

Because Plaintiff has not stated a claim of a violation of his federal rights, Defendants are also entitled to qualified immunity. See Reichle v. … was clearly established at the time of the challenged conduct.”).

Munt v. Roy

District Court, D. Minnesota · Sep 13, 2019

of qualified immunity. … Qualified immunity depends upon whether the plaintiff has stated a plausible claim for violation of a constitutional right and whether that right was clearly established at the time of the alleged misconduct, such that

Sanford v. Kirst

District Court, M.D. Louisiana · Jun 16, 2023

of a clearly established statutory or constitutional right. … in light of clearly established law.

Alfred

District Court, W.D. Louisiana · Oct 16, 2025

Lee, 946 F.2d 1152, 1159 (5th Cir. 1991) (federal common law recognizes a qualified privilege protecting investigative files in an ongoing criminal investigation). … Federal courts “overwhelmingly treat this privilege as a qualified one, which is subject to a balancing process that may lead to court-ordered disclosure of privileged materials, and which may be subject to waiver by the

Rancho del Oso Pardo, Inc. v. New Mexico Department of Game and Fish

District Court, D. New Mexico · Sep 15, 2022

Qualified Immunity Qualified immunity protects public officials from liability “insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional … a right was clearly established.

Dorr v. Weber

741 F. Supp. 2d 993 · District Court, N.D. Iowa · May 18, 2010

In their motion, defendants contend that Sheriff Weber is entitled to qualified immunity on the Dorrs’ Second Amendment claim because the right to have a concealed carrying permit has not been clearly established. … Clearly established constitutional right at the time Under the second step in the qualified immunity analysis, a right is “clearly established” if “a ‘reasonable officer would understand that what he is doing violates that

Williams v. Kenton County, KY

District Court, E.D. Kentucky · Feb 16, 2023

The qualified immunity analysis has “two steps that can be undertaken in any order: (1) whether the public official’s conduct violated a constitutional right, and (2) whether that right was clearly … Clearly Established Under the second prong of the qualified immunity doctrine, a right is “clearly established” if “[t]he contours of the right [are] sufficiently clear

Timothy Ryan v. Brant Putnam

District Court, C.D. California · Mar 21, 2022

“Qualified immunity is applicable unless the official’s conduct violated a clearly established constitutional right.” Pearson, 555 U.S. at 232. 1. … Defendants also argue that “|t|he absence of clearly established law on the temporal nexus issue |] entitles Drs. de Virgilio and Lewis to qualified immunity.” Mot. at 41-42.

Tyehimba v. Cook County D.O.C.

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 15, 2024

To defeat a qualified immunity defense, a plaintiff must plead facts that show “(1) that the official violated a statutory or constitutional right, and (2) that the right was clearly established at the time of the challenged … of clearly established law.”)

Hammond v. Anderson

District Court, D. Colorado · Aug 11, 2020

immunity grounds. … Gomez, 745 F.3d 405, 411 (10th Cir. 2014) (Qualified immunity is a defense that “shields public officials from damages actions unless their conduct was unreasonable in light of clearly established law.”); Gutierrez v.

YAH 'TORAH v. EMRICH

District Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 28, 2022

Qualified immunity protects government officials “from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have … There is a two-step inquiry into whether qualified immunity applies: (1) whether the official’s conduct violated a constitutional or federal right; and (2) whether the right at issue was clearly established.

Baldyga

District Court, D. Colorado · Apr 6, 2026

To rebut an assertion of qualified immunity, a plaintiff must establish “(1) that the defendant violated a constitutional or statutory right, and (2) that this right was clearly established at the time of the defendant … See ECF No. 43 at 6-7 (listing cases under heading “Qualified Immunity Does Not Apply at the Pleading Stage”). Indeed, the cases referenced in the court’s analysis here clearly establish the contrary proposition.

Marcum v. Moles

District Court, S.D. West Virginia · Jul 15, 2022

Qualified immunity is an affirmative defense to Section 1983 that applies when an officer’s “conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights known to … Moles violated Marcum’s Eighth Amendment rights, the court must now resolve whether those rights were “clearly established” sufficiently to defeat Corporal Moles’ raising of qualified

Westry v. Leon

District Court, D. Connecticut · Dec 21, 2019

“An officer conducting a search is entitled to qualified immunity where clearly established law does not show that the search violated the Fourth Amendment.” Pearson, 555 U.S. at 243-44 (citing Anderson v. … “In the Second Circuit, qualified immunity analysis consists of a three-step inquiry examining whether there is an alleged violation of a constitutional right, whether the right was clearly established at the time of the

Lopez v. Stanford

District Court, E.D. New York · Nov 24, 2020

While the defense of qualified immunity may be asserted on a Rule 12(b)(6) motion, “the complaint itself [must] establish[] the circumstances required as a predicate to a finding of qualified immunity.” McKenna v. … The Court finds that Plaintiff’s rights were not clearly established under Packingham and that Defendants are therefore entitled to qualified immunity.

Castro v. Utah County Sheriff's Department

District Court, D. Utah · Sep 20, 2024

from damages actions unless their conduct was unreasonable in light of clearly established law.”47 “Once an individual defendant asserts qualified immunity, the plaintiff carries a two-part burden to show: (1) that the … When defining a flagrant violation, the Spackman court essentially adopted the same standard for determining whether a right is clearly established for purposes of qualified immunity.

Wolfe v. Hocking County Sheriff's Department

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Nov 18, 2024

Sept. 8, 2021) (affirming a grant of qualified immunity on the clearly established prong where officers searched the plaintiff’s home and seized property listed in a divorce order); Bates v. … Because Defendants raise qualified immunity, Plaintiff must allege sufficient facts showing that (1) Defendants’ conduct violated his Second Amendment right, and (2) that the right was clearly established at the time.