Case law

Woodhead v. Ridener

District Court, E.D. Kentucky · Jun 8, 2022

to juror to conclude that the defendant violated a clearly established constitutional right. … However, under the present circumstances, the defendants cannot be said to have violated any clearly established constitutional right. Accordingly, they are entitled to qualified immunity. 2.

Paez v. Nutsch

District Court, D. Nebraska · May 12, 2022

QUALIFIED IMMUNITY Qualified immunity shields officials from civil liability in a 42 U.S.C. §1983 action when their conduct “does not violate clearly established statutory or … “Qualified immunity is an affirmative defense for which the defendant carries the burden of proof. The plaintiff, however, must demonstrate that the law is clearly established.” Sparr v.

Cronin v. Town of Amesbury

895 F. Supp. 375 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jul 25, 1995

Qualified Immunity In any event, Koelsch asserts the defense of qualified immunity. … The qualified immunity inquiry in this context is a familiar one: Qualified immunity shields government official performing discretionary functions from civil damages “insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established

Jones v. County of Tulare, California

District Court, E.D. California · Jun 20, 2023

In other words, a “public official is entitled to qualified 9 immunity unless (1) ‘the facts . . . show that the official’s conduct violated a constitutional right;’ 10 and (2) the right at issue ‘was clearly established … Granting summary judgment on the ground of qualified immunity 4 is “improper if, under the plaintiff's version of the facts, and in light of the clearly established law, 5 a reasonable officer could not have believed

Sciotto Ex Rel. Sciotto v. Marple Newtown School District

81 F. Supp. 2d 559 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 23, 1999

Qualified Immunity Defendants James Smith and Stu Nathans claim that they are entitled to qualified immunity from plaintiffs’ suit. The defendants have met their burden of pleading a qualified immunity defense, Gomez v. … a right for qualified immunity purposes.

(PC) Petillo v. Jasso

District Court, E.D. California · Jan 24, 2023

If the law 18 did not put the officer on notice that his conduct would be clearly unlawful, summary judgment 19 based on qualified immunity is appropriate. … Willden, 26 678 F.3d 991, 1000 (9th Cir. 2012) (qualified immunity analysis requiring (1) determining the 27 contours of the clearly established right at the time of the challenged conduct and (2) examining 1

Harris v. The City of Texico

District Court, D. New Mexico · Mar 7, 2023

Qualified Immunity Qualified immunity protects public officials from liability “insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional … violation was clearly established.

McCormick v. Hall

District Court, W.D. Virginia · Sep 8, 2022

qualified immunity. … Because Plaintiff has pleaded a plausible violation of a right clearly established at the time of the incident, Hall is not entitled to qualified immunity at this stage.

Jarvis v. City of Daytona Beach

District Court, M.D. Florida · Oct 23, 2024

A district court’s order denying the defense of qualified immunity is an immediately appealable order within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Mitchell v. … Until the Eleventh Circuit determines whether the relevant law was clearly established, Defendants should not be subjected to trial.

Matthews v. Foss

District Court, N.D. California · Aug 6, 2024

Saucier, 25 533 U.S. at 202. 26 A court considering a claim of qualified immunity must determine whether the 1 was clearly established such that it would … , 533 U.S. at 194); Henry A., 678 F.3d at 1000 (qualified immunity analysis 6 requiring (1) determining the contours of the clearly established right at the time of the 7 challenged conduct and (2) examining whether

Hanson v. Blaine County

District Court, D. Idaho · Sep 19, 2019

Defendants stress that Escondido reiterated that for purposes of qualified immunity, “the clearly established right must be defined with specificity” and “repeat[ed] its holding from Kisela [v. … Defendants believe that the Court “needed to identify cases with particularized facts to show that the Defendants’ acts were clearly unlawful” to deny them qualified immunity at the summary judgment stage.

DeNigris v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.

861 F. Supp. 2d 185 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 9, 2012

Qualified Immunity Defendants contend that Defendant Frisch is entitled to qualified immunity in her individual capacity. … Accordingly, a grant of qualified immunity is wholly inappropriate at this stage of the proceedings. *197 III.

ZISA v. HAVILAND

District Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 31, 2020

Haviland does not address whether his alleged constitutional harm violated a clearly established right. “[T]he burden of pleading a qualified immunity defense rests with the defendant.” Thomas v. … App’x 373, 378-79 (3d Cir. 2004) (“To the extent the Supervisory Defendants fail to address the issue [of whether a right was clearly established], therefore, their claim for qualified immunity fails ipso facto.”).

Amburgey v. Doe

District Court, W.D. Kentucky · Apr 20, 2023

For the same reason, Trebuna is entitled to qualified immunity from suit. See Mitchell v. Forsyth, 472 U.S. 511, 526, 105 S. Ct. 2806, 2815, 86 L. … Ed. 2d 411 (1985) (“Unless the plaintiff’s allegations state a claim of violation of clearly established law, a defendant pleading qualified immunity is entitled to dismissal before the commencement of discovery.”).

Millbrook v. Spitz

District Court, D. Colorado · Sep 23, 2019

immunity. … Callahan, 555 U.S. 223, 231 (2009) (“The doctrine of qualified immunity protects government officials from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional

Robison v. Department of Insurance, Finanical Institutions and Professional Registration

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Mar 1, 2022

In a claim brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, qualified immunity protects a government official from liability unless his conduct violated a clearly established constitutional or statutory right of which a reasonable person … [174], Plaintiff has not shown he has a “clearly established” constitutional or statutory right to be on the List.9 Pearson, 555 U.S. at 231 (explaining qualified immunity protects a government official from

Varnado

District Court, M.D. Louisiana · Nov 25, 2025

Qualified Immunity Public officials are entitled to qualified immunity unless the plaintiff demonstrates that (1) the defendant violated an actual constitutional or federal statutory right that is clearly established … The qualified immunity defense has two prongs: whether an official's conduct violated a constitutional right of the plaintiff; and whether the right was clearly established at the time of the violation.

Elston v. Collins

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Nov 15, 2019

Qualified Immunity “Qualified immunity shields government officials from liability unless their conduct violates clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would know … right was clearly established at the time of the violation.”

Estate of Sylville K Smith v. City of Milwaukee Wisconsin

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · Oct 18, 2019

Whether the right was “clearly established” at the time of its alleged violation In establishing the second prong in the qualified immunity analysis, a plaintiff bears the burden of establishing that the constitutional … right was “clearly established.”

Harvey v. City of Galveston

District Court, S.D. Texas · Jul 17, 2025

Hanna, 726 F.3d 631, 638 (5th Cir. 2013) (qualified immunity requires alleging a violation of a clearly established constitutional right at the time of the conduct). … Because the complaint plausibly alleges facts supporting a violation of clearly established right under the Fourteenth Amendment, Roy is not entitled to qualified immunity at this stage.