Case law

Brown v. Beck

481 F. Supp. 723 · District Court, S.D. Georgia · Jan 9, 1980

Only the first defendants (the Sheriff of Richmond County and the members of the Board of County Commissioners), are involved in this proceeding. … Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 107 , 97 S.Ct. 285, 293 , 50 L.Ed.2d 251 .

Brown v. Devlin

116 F. Supp. 45 · District Court, D. Montana · Aug 4, 1953

Love v. United States, 8 Cir., 1939, 108 F.2d 43 ; Atlantic Meat Co. v. R. F. C., 1 Cir., 1948, 166 F.2d 51 ; McCarty v. Hollis, 10 Cir., 1941, 120 F.2d 540 . … Hann v. Venetian Blind Corporation, D.C.S.D.Cal.1936, 15 F.Supp. 372 ; Clark v. Memolo, 1940, 85 U.S.App. D.C. 65, 174 F.2d 978 ; Lynn v. United States, 5 Cir., 1940, 110 F.2d 586 .

Brown v. Jones

407 F. Supp. 686 · District Court, W.D. Texas · Nov 4, 1974

For substantially the same reasons as outlined in Brown v. State, supra, the Court does not agree. … Brown v. Jones, 489 F.2d 1040 (5th Cir., 1974). 2 . The validity of this initial search is not contested by Brown and is not an issue in this case. 3 . Brown v. State, supra. 4 .

Brown v. Safeway

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 13, 2025

BROWN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. … (citing Carroll v. Merriwether, 921 F.

Wilson v. Brown

106 F. Supp. 500 · District Court, W.D. Kentucky · Aug 6, 1952

Austin’s Adm’r v. Pittsburg, C., C. & St. L. Ry. … “In Brown’s Adm’r v. Louisville & N. R.

Greene v. Brown

535 F. Supp. 1096 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 23, 1982

Griffin v. Breckenridge, 403 U.S. 88, 102 , 91 S.Ct. 1790, 1798 , 29 L.Ed.2d 338 (1971); Morpurgo v. Board of Education in City of New York, 423 F.Supp. 704, 711 (S.D.N.Y.1976). … Griffin v. Breckenridge, 403 U.S. at 102 , 91 S.Ct. at 1798 ; Powel v. Jarvis, 460 F.2d 551, 553 (2d Cir. 1972); Morpurgo v. Board of Higher Education in City of New York, 423 F.Supp. at 711 .

Brown v. Wick

48 F. Supp. 887 · District Court, E.D. Michigan · Feb 19, 1943

Henderson v. Kimmel, D.C., Kan., 47 F.Supp. 635 ; Dieffenbaugh v. Cook, et al., D.C., Ind., 47 F.Supp. 645 . 2.

Brown v. Vasquez

743 F. Supp. 729 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 4, 1990

People v. Brown, 46 Cal.3d 432 , 250 Cal.Rptr. 604 , 758 P.2d 1135 (1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1059 , 109 S.Ct. 1329 , 103 L.Ed.2d 597 (1989). … People v. Brown, 46 Cal.3d at 446-48 , 250 Cal.Rptr. 604 , 758 P.2d 1135 .

Naum v. Brown

604 F. Supp. 1186 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 22, 1985

Naum v. Heckler, CV 83-2580; Naum v. Free and Accepted Masons, et al., CV 84-2651; Naum v. Douglas, et al, CV 84-2778; Naum v. Mitchell, CV 84-2779 (dismissed September 12, 1984); Naum v. … Sanders, CV 84-2780; and Naum v. Brown, CV 84-2921.

Brown v. Crist

492 F. Supp. 965 · District Court, D. Montana · Jul 7, 1980

State v. … Thus, in North Carolina v.

Bolbol v. Brown

120 F. Supp. 3d 1010 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 14, 2015

Coal to Defend Affirmative Action v. Brown, 674 F.3d 1128, 1134 (9th Cir.2012). The state official “ ‘must have some connection with the enforcement of the act.’ ” Id. … Mujica v. AirScan Inc., 771 F.3d 580 , 593 & n. 8 (9th Cir.2014); Dumas v. Kipp, 90 F.3d 386, 393 (9th Cir.1996).

Rogers v. Brown

986 F. Supp. 354 · District Court, M.D. Louisiana · Dec 17, 1997

In Rojas v. … In Welch v. A.G.

Brown v. Crosby

249 F. Supp. 2d 1285 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Mar 19, 2003

See Brown v. Singletary, 229 F.Supp.2d 1345 (S.D.Fla.2002). … as Brown’s case did not involve the situation presented in Stokes v.

Brown v. Fogle

819 F. Supp. 2d 23 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 18, 2011

OLIVIA BROWN et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. … Olivia Brown, proceeding pro se, sues on behalf of herself and her four minor children under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and District of Columbia tort law.

Brown v. Beto

338 F. Supp. 1358 · District Court, S.D. Texas · Dec 17, 1971

In United States v. … Respondent also cites two appellate cases which describe situations distinguishable from the circumstances surrounding the interrogation of Petitioner Brown. In Allen v.

Brown v. Pepe

42 F. Supp. 3d 310 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 8, 2014

See Brown v. Pepe, 2013 WL 3246127 , at *3 (D.Mass. June 25, 2013). … On November 12, 2013, Brown filed a second complaint in the Northern District of Georgia, this time omitting Sheriff Brown as a defendant. See Brown v. Pepe, No. 13-cv-03751 (N.D.Ga.2013) (Brown II).

Brown v. Sombrotto

523 F. Supp. 127 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 19, 1981

Plaintiffs Brown and Ratto were among these delegates. … Calhoon v. Harvey, supra, 379 U.S. at 140 , 85 S.Ct. at 296 . *132 Gurton v. Arons, supra, 339 F.2d at 375 . Accord Sheldon v.

Koutnik v. Brown

396 F. Supp. 2d 978 · District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · Nov 2, 2005

Miksis v. Howard, 106 F.3d 754, 760 (7th Cir.1997); Finley v. Marathon Oil Co., 75 F.3d 1225, 1231 (7th Cir.1996). … Defendant Brown’s view is the view entitled to deference, even if I disagreed with it. Bell v.

Blunt v. Brown

225 F. Supp. 326 · District Court, S.D. Iowa · Dec 23, 1963

This matter is before the Court on the motions of defendants, Joseph Dale Brown and Leo Franklin Brown, for leave to make Howard Blunt, Jr. a third party defendant in the above causes pursuant to Rule 14 of the Federal Rules … The plaintiffs were riding as passengers in an automobile owned and operated by Howard Blunt, Jr., which collided with an automobile owned by the defendant, Leo Franklin Brown and driven by defendant, Joseph Dale Brown.

Armstrong v. Brown

857 F. Supp. 2d 919 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 11, 2012

V. Constitutionality under Printz v. United States and New York v. … In Johnson v.