Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersFD

10,000+ results

0.68s

  • Brown v. Brannon

    399 F. Supp. 133 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jul 28, 1975

    Brown, Thomas Page, Spence Shannon, Fred McGill, and James Hogge, are owners and operators of their respective massage parlor businesses located within the City of Durham, Durham County, North Carolina. … In Steffel v.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Baskin

    78 F. Supp. 933 · District Court, E.D. South Carolina · Jul 20, 1948

    In that case (Elmore v. Rice, D. … Waites Waring, United States District Judge, in the case of Elmore, etc. v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Califano

    75 F.R.D. 497 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 17, 1977

    See Brown v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, 411 F.Supp. 1001, 1002 (D.D.C.1975). … Koll v. Wayzata State Bank, supra, 397 F.2d at 127 ; Johnson v. Hunger, 266 F.Supp. 590, 591 (S.D.N.Y.1967).

    Cited 845 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Colvin

    111 F. Supp. 3d 89 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 30, 2015

    Brown cites Cabral and Bazile v. Apfel, 113 F.Supp.2d 181 (D.Mass.2000) in support of her contention. … Aug. 6, 2013); see also Pires v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Pepersack

    217 F. Supp. 547 · District Court, D. Maryland · May 24, 1963

    v. … Brown v. Warden, 228 Md. 654 , 179 A.2d 419 .

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • McKithen v. Brown

    565 F. Supp. 2d 440 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 21, 2008

    McKithen v. Brown (McKithen VII), 481 F.3d 89, 93 (2d Cir.2007), cert. denied sub nom. Brown v. McKithen (McKithen VIII), — *447 U.S. -, 128 S.Ct. 1218 , 170 L.Ed.2d 59 (2008). … Id. at 11 , 99 S.Ct. 2100 . 12 This holding was reaffirmed and extended to commutations in Connecticut Board of Pardons v. Dumschat. 452 U.S. at 463-64 , 101 S.Ct. 2460 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Jatros

    55 F. Supp. 542 · District Court, E.D. Michigan · May 24, 1944

    With this status of the Liquor industry before us we examined the case of State Board of Equalization of State of California et al. v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brown ex rel. Brown v. Edwards

    258 F. Supp. 696 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 30, 1966

    In Lenahan v. Pittston Coal Min. … Baymond v. Sternberger, 116 Pa.Super. 451 , 176 A. 787 (1935); Guckavan v. Lehigh Traction Co., 203 Pa. 521 , ro . T ,T 53 A. 351 (1902); Jury v. New York Central R.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Moore

    93 F. Supp. 3d 1032 · District Court, W.D. Arkansas · Mar 18, 2015

    He states that he is asserting the lack of outside exercise claim in Brown v. … Hickman, Civil No. 12-3150; (3) his claims against Detective Ryan Watson and Captain Bob King, Brown v. Hickman, Civil No. 12-3150; (4) his lack of outside exercise claim, Brown v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Hyman v. Brown

    197 F. Supp. 3d 413 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 13, 2016

    See House v. … "Courts have routinely recognized that witness recantations 'must be looked upon with the utmost suspicion,’" Brown v. Woods, 07 CV 0058 (DL1), 2009 WL 789443 , *7 (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 20, 2009) (quoting, Haouari v.

    Reversed by Hyman v. Brown, 927 F.3d 639 (2019)Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Evanston Bank (In Re Brown)

    126 B.R. 767 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Feb 15, 1991

    Compare Altman v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service, 83 B.R. 35 (D.Haw.1988); In re Paul; Professional Technical Services; DiFlorio v. … Leasing Corp. v. United States, 429 U.S. 338, 350 , 97 S.Ct. 619, 627 , 50 L.Ed.2d 530 (1977); United States v. Donahue Indust., Inc., 905 F.2d 1325, 1329-1330 (9th Cir.1990). In G.M.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Miller v. Brown

    465 F. Supp. 2d 584 · District Court, E.D. Virginia · Jan 16, 2007

    See Miller v. Brown, 462 F.3d 312, 318 (4th Cir.2006). The defendants maintain, however, that Virginia’s election law must be examined in its totality to determine whether it imposes an impermissible burden. … In Burdick v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Sumlin v. Brown

    420 F. Supp. 78 · District Court, N.D. Florida · Jul 29, 1976

    Brown v. Blake & Bane, Inc., supra, at 623. Two courts have held, however, in Brown v. … Brown v. Blake & Bane, supra, at 623.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Howell v. Brown

    85 F. Supp. 537 · District Court, D. Nebraska · Sep 14, 1949

    In McIntire v. … Precisely how the Board of Pardons is executing or proposes to execute such order and judgment is not made to appear.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Brewer v. Boles

    261 F. Supp. 920 · District Court, N.D. West Virginia · Jan 4, 1967

    In the absence of any specific statutory prohibition against the cancellation of a parole discharge, this Court is guided by the following language of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in Jones v. … This Court finds no evidence of arbitrary behavior here on the part of the West Virginia Board of Probation and Parole.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Miller

    286 F. 994 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 5, 1923

    E. 422 ; Weidekind v. County Water Co., 74 Cal. 386 , 19 Pac. 173 , 5 Am. St. Rep. 445 ; Gaulden v. State of Georgia, 11 Ga. 47 ; Nickels v. Griffin, 1 Wash. T. 374; Wilson v. State, 16 Ind. 392 ; Peirce v. … Brown had *998 such connection with this matter that I think renders it, I will not say grossly improper, but I think very inexpedient, for him to represent the plaintiff in this case.”

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Westmoreland v. Brown

    883 F. Supp. 67 · District Court, E.D. Virginia · Mar 21, 1995

    The pleadings do not *70 disclose what motivated Deputy Brown’s deplorable conduct; however, at oral argument, counsel indicated that Brown had instigated the attack because Westmoreland had burglarized Brown’s house. … Thus, the attack initiated by Brown may have taken place within a few hours after Brown asked Seward to arrange it. 3 .

    Cited 41 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Baskin

    80 F. Supp. 1017 · District Court, E.D. South Carolina · Nov 26, 1948

    See Brown v. Baskin, D. C., 78 F.Supp. 933 . The injunction Order was modified in some particulars by Order filed July 22, 1948. … On behalf of the defendants it was argued that the form of oath and rules that had heretofore been adopted by the State Party (see opinion in Brown v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Lynn

    385 F. Supp. 986 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Oct 11, 1974

    Talbot v. Romney, 334 F.Supp. 1074 (S.D.N.Y.1971); Davis v. Romney, supra. … Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972); Perry v. Sindermann, 408 U.S. 593 , 92 S.Ct. 2694 , 33 L.Ed.2d 570 (1972).

    Cited 51 timesPublished
  • Aldis v. Brown

    412 F. Supp. 1066 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Dec 18, 1975

    United States v. … Costello v. Fazio, 256 F.2d 903 (Ninth Cir. 1958); In Re Anjopa Paper & Board Manufacturing Co., 269 F.Supp. 241 (S.D.N.Y. 1967).

    Cited 15 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.