Case law

Keziah v. W.M. Brown & Son, Inc.

683 F. Supp. 542 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Apr 6, 1988

Restatement (Second) of Torts § 46 (1965); Dickens v. Puryear, 276 S.E.2d 325, 332 (N.C.1981). In Patterson v. … In Meritor Savings Bank v.

United States v. Brown

3 F. Supp. 608 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jun 1, 1933

part of the res taken into possession by the Superintendent of Insurance, under warrant of law, and in a liquidation proceeding of which the Supreme Court of the state of New York had jurisdiction; compare Lion Bonding Co. v.

Brown v. United States

573 F. Supp. 743 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Sep 15, 1983

In Garbarino v. … See Hill v. Schweiker, 532 F.Supp. 1014 (D.N.H.1982). III. The Montgomery SSA office was negligent or wanton in failing to inform Mr. Brown of his condition. .Plaintiff claims that Mr.

Godfrey v. Brown Paper Mill Co.

52 F. Supp. 926 · District Court, W.D. Louisiana · Nov 18, 1943

See Roussell v. Colonial Sugars Co., La.App., 147 So. 75 ; Ford v. … Wright v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. 5 Cir., 19 F.2d 117 ; and authorities cited therein; Mitchell v. Mutual Life Ins. Co., D. C., 31 F.Supp. 441 ; Smith v. New York Life Ins. Co., 205 N.C. 348 , 171 S.E. 330 ; Asbury v.

Morgan v. Social Security Board

45 F. Supp. 349 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · May 28, 1942

Norwegian Nitrogen Products Co. v. United States, 288 U.S. 294, 315 , 53 S.Ct. 350, 358 , 77 L.Ed. 796 ; Womack v. Consolidated Timber Co., D.C., 43 F.Supp. 625, 632 . … Bailey v. Holland, 4 Cir., 126 F.2d 317 ; Thompson v. Consolidated Gas. Utilities Corp., 300 U.S. 55, 69 , 57 S.Ct. 364 , 81 L.Ed. 510 .

Herster v. Board of Supervisors

221 F. Supp. 3d 791 · District Court, M.D. Louisiana · Nov 22, 2016

Anderson v. … (quoting Kronisch v. U.S., 150 F.3d 112 , 126 (2d Cir. 1998)). . Id. . Id. . In Reynolds v.

Ferkel v. Board of Education

45 F. Supp. 3d 824 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · May 28, 2014

Woods v. Ind. Univ. … Instead, the Board could follow any set of procedures that passes muster under Mathews v. El dridge’s balancing test; it would not necessarily have to follow its own prescribed procedures. Cf. Head v. Chi. Sch.

United States v. Brown

595 F. Supp. 473 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Aug 31, 1984

United States v. Earline Brown, 716 F.2d 457, 462 (7th Cir.1983). If the finding is that the accounts were in tolerance, the Court of Appeals’ instructions are to enter a judgment of conviction. … (Brown at 468). The defendant’s testimony was not believed. . The Court of Appeals discussed Exhibit 5 and found it lacking.

Brown v. Margrande Compania Naviera, S. A.

281 F. Supp. 1004 · District Court, E.D. Virginia · Mar 15, 1968

Terry v. Yancey, 344 F.2d 789 (4th Cir. 1965); Boyle v. United States, 355 F.2d 233 (3d Cir. 1965); Pigott v. Texaco, Inc., 358 F.2d 723 (5th Cir. 1966); United States v. Martin, 337 F.2d 171 (8th Cir. 1964); Markow v. … United States v.

Disparte v. Corporate Executive Board

223 F.R.D. 7 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 13, 2004

United States v. … But see Grayson v.

Brown v. Ethyl Corp.

222 F. Supp. 734 · District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Sep 25, 1963

Defendant cites Ward v. Curry, 341 S.W.2d 830 (1960), a Missouri case, and Michaels v. … In Pullen v.

Dunkley v. Board of Education

216 F. Supp. 3d 485 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Oct 20, 2016

G.D.M. v. Board of Education of the Ramapo Indian Hills Regional High School Dist., 427 N.J.Super. 246 , 48 A.3d 378, 386 (2012). … McKee v.

Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. Anghyra

198 F. Supp. 321 · District Court, E.D. Virginia · Jul 18, 1961

Hellenic Lines, Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 4 Cir., 277 F.2d 9 . Certiorari was denied, Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. et al. v. Hellenic Lines, Ltd. et al., 364 U.S. 879 , 81 S.Ct. 168 , 5 L.Ed.2d 102 . … On its cross-libel against Liggett & Myers, Brown & Williamson and A.

Lodico v. Board of Supervisors

256 F. Supp. 440 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 16, 1966

McKinney’s Consol.Laws, c. 11] of the State of New York * * * [is] illegal, invalid, void and unconstitutional” 1 and “that the defendant immediately reconstitute and formulate a plan wherein and whereby the vote of the BOARD … This court is of the opinion that the principle of Bailey v.

Chen v. Aitken

917 F. Supp. 2d 1013 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 8, 2013

Respondents point to the Supreme Court’s decision in Demore v. … Landon v. Plasencia, 459 U.S. 21, 32 , 103 S.Ct. 321 , 74 L.Ed.2d 21 (1982).

Brown v. United States

743 F. Supp. 742 · District Court, D. Nevada · Aug 13, 1990

Brown and Marie Brown (taxpayers) were assessed income tax deficiencies for the calendar years 1977, 1978, 1979, 1980 and 1981 and real property owned by taxpayers at 3975 Lamay Lane, Reno, Nevada was levied upon and sold … Mulcahy v. United States, 388 F.2d 300 (5th Cir.1968); Falik v. United States, 343 F.2d 38 (2d Cir.1965).

Brown v. Eastern Maine Medical Center

514 F. Supp. 2d 104 · District Court, D. Maine · Oct 15, 2007

In Hodgens v. … See e.g., Burnett v. LFW Inc., 472 F.3d 471, 479 (7th Cir.2006); Cavin v. Honda of America Mfg., Inc., 346 F.3d 713, 724-725 (6th Cir.2003).

Brown v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 3, 2020

Brown v. District of Columbia, 928 F.3d 1070, 1079 (D.C. Cir. 2019). The court of appeals therefore remanded for a new trial. See id. at 1083-85 (laying out remand instructions). … See Brown v. District of Columbia, 928 F.3d 1070. Since then, both parties have sought extensions of time to complete discovery.

Wakeland v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.

996 F. Supp. 1213 · District Court, S.D. Alabama · Mar 5, 1998

Named as defendants are many of the major tobacco concerns: Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation, The American Tobacco Company, Lorillard Tobacco Company, R.J. … Tapscott v.

George v. Board of Education

34 F. Supp. 3d 442 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 23, 2014

Under Monell v. … Gant v.