Case law

Brown v. Sun Healthcare Group, Inc.

476 F. Supp. 2d 848 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Feb 21, 2007

Brown suffered injury because of a failure on the part of the staff of Voss to properly position Mr. Brown, and that Mr. … V.

Brown v. Columbia Sussex Corporation

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 25, 2010

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ANTONIO BROWN, ) ) Plaintiff, … See Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. Sheets, 313 U.S. 100, 108 (1941); LaPoint v. Mid-Atlantic Settlement Servs., 256 F. Supp. 2d 1,3 (D.D.C. 2003).

Davenport v. Hamilton, Brown, & Babst, L.L.C.

624 F. Supp. 2d 542 · District Court, M.D. Louisiana · Jun 19, 2008

Butler v. Polk, 592 F.2d 1293, 1295 (5th Cir.1979). … See, Lewis v.

Brown v. United States

377 F. Supp. 370 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Mar 6, 1974

Plaintiffs, DeWitt Brown and Othel F. … In Trotz v.

Chance v. Board of Examiners

330 F. Supp. 203 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 14, 1971

Committee on Character and Fitness, 373 U.S. 96 , 83 S.Ct. 1175 , 10 L.Ed.2d 224 (1963); Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners of New Mexico, 353 U.S. 232, 238-239 , 77 S.Ct. 752 , 1 L.Ed.2d 796 (1957); Armstead v. … See Harper v. Virginia State Board of Elections, 383 U.S. 663 , 86 S.Ct. 1079 , 16 L.Ed.2d 169 (1966), and dissenting opinion of Justice Harlan in Shapiro v.

Brown v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

976 F. Supp. 729 · District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Jun 9, 1997

Restatement, supra, § 390; see Woodson v. Porter Brown Limestone Co., 916 S.W.2d 896, 907 (Tenn.1996). … The rule in Brown v. Harkleroad, 39 Tenn.App. 657 , 287 S.W.2d 92 (1956), limiting negligent entrustment suits to situations involving some sort of bailment, has been fiercely criticized. In Nichols v.

Elf-Man, LLC v. Brown

996 F. Supp. 2d 1056 · District Court, E.D. Washington · Jan 22, 2014

Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 , 129 S.Ct. 1937 , 173 L.Ed.2d 868 (2009). … United States v. Corinthian Colleges, 655 F.3d 984, 995 (9th Cir.2011). A.

Brown v. Con-Way Freight, Inc.

891 F. Supp. 2d 912 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · May 15, 2012

Stockwell v. City of Harvey, 597 F.3d 895, 902 (7th Cir.2010) (citing Blise v. Antaramian, 409 F.3d 861, 867 (7th Cir.2005)). That principle holds true in cases brought under USERRA. See Amendola v. Mayo Found. for Med. … Madden v. Rolls Royce Corp., 563 F.3d 636, 638 (7th Cir.2009). Brown fails to meet this burden.

Perez v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.

967 F. Supp. 920 · District Court, S.D. Texas · Jun 4, 1997

On this day came on to be considered Defendants Brown & William Tobacco Corp. (“B & W”), British American Tobacco Company, Ltd. (“British”), Philip Morris, Inc. (“Philip Morris”), R.J. … .”); Gordon v.

United States v. Brown

398 F. Supp. 444 · District Court, E.D. Michigan · Aug 22, 1975

See United States v. Bisceglia, supra, at 147-8, 95 S.Ct. 915 ; United States v. Powell, supra, at 57, 85 S.Ct. 248 . … See United States v. Mara, supra; United States v. Dionisio, supra.

Brown v. BAYLOR HEALTH CARE SYSTEM

662 F. Supp. 2d 669 · District Court, S.D. Texas · Jul 20, 2009

(quoting In re Alappat, 33 F.3d 1526, 1545 (Fed.Cir.1994) (en banc)). *679 Brown’s summary judgment opposition cites no case law to the contrary. (Docket Entry No. 158 at 7-8). Brown cites Phillips v. … Brown cites American Hoist & Derrick Co. v.

Brown v. Medical College of Ohio

79 F. Supp. 2d 840 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Dec 28, 1999

Brown requested, and received, the six-month leave of absence in order to search for a new job while he was, technically, still employed. … On October 26, 1999, MCO instituted a formal investigation of Brown’s alleged professional improprieties. That investigation remains pending.

Brown v. Artery Organization, Inc.

691 F. Supp. 1459 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 8, 1987

See Reynolds v. Sheet Metal Workers, Local 102, 702 F.2d 221, 226 (D.C.Cir.1981). … See Orantes-Hernandez v. Smith, 541 F.Supp. 351 (C.D.Cal.1982); Bartels v. Biernat, 405 F.Supp. 1012, 1019 (E.D.Wis.1975); Bass v.

Real Estate Loan Co. v. Brown

23 F.2d 329 · District Court, N.D. Georgia · Dec 31, 1927

Fidelity Insurance Co. v. Huntington, 117 U. S. 280 , 6 S. Ct. 733 , 29 L. Ed. 898 . … Denny v. Broadway Bank, 118 Ga. 221 , 44 S. E. 982 . But to seize property was the ancient way of compelling an appearance.

Brown v. Psi Services, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 13, 2010

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ANGELINA BROWN, Plaintiff, v. … Stella v. Mineta, 284 F.3d 135, 145 (D.C. Cir. 2002) (citing Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C. Cir. 1999)).

Brown v. D.C. Public Schools

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 28, 2010

See Docket Entry #6 (captioned as "REPLY to opposition to motion re MOTION to Dismiss and/or for More Definite Statement to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand filed by DANNY BROWN." (emphasis omitted)). … (quoting Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 181 (1962))).

Brown Drug Co. v. United States

235 F. 603 · District Court, N.D. Iowa · Oct 2, 1916

When we come, to the question as to whether the temporary injunction shall be granted or not. a majority are agreed it cannot be done. [2] The decision in the so-called Shreveport Case, the Houston & Texas Railway v.

Alaska Movers Ass'n v. Brown

445 F. Supp. 363 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 25, 1978

Schraier v. Hickel, 136 U.S.App.D.C. 81 , 419 F.2d 663 (1969); Gonzalez v. Freeman, 118 U.S.App. D.C. 180, 334 F.2d 570 (1964); Copper Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Campbell, 110 U.S.App.D.C. 177 , 290 F.2d 368 (1961).

Wells Fargo Century, Inc. v. Brown

475 F. Supp. 2d 368 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 21, 2007

(“Wells Fargo”) commenced an action in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County (the “State Court”), against Peter Brown (“Brown”), Daniel Rubin, and Leonard Rubin (the “Rubins”) (collectively, the “Defendants … See Jones v.

Brown v. District of Columbia

822 F. Supp. 17 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 28, 1993

After deliberation, the Adjustment Board found Brown guilty of all five charges. Brown was required to serve 14 days in administrative segregation or detention as a result of the findings of the Board. … presented at the hearing; and second, because the Board failed to provide Brown with an adequate written statement setting forth the evidence relied upon in reaching its decision.