Case law

Brown v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 2, 2011

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA YVONNE BROWN, Plaintiff, v. … Lutkewitte v. Gonzales, 436 F.3d 248, 252-54 (D.C.

Brown v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 3, 2011

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA YVONNE BROWN, Plaintiff, v. … That Plaintiff Yvonne Brown was subjected to a sexually hostile work environment? YES. [...] 2.

Brown v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

602 F. Supp. 2d 173 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 16, 2009

Lynn v. Lappin, 593 F.Supp.2d 104, 104 (D.D.C.2009); Jackson v. Bureau of Prisons, 538 F.Supp.2d 194, 199 (D.D.C.2008); Brown v. Bureau of Prisons, 498 F.Supp.2d 298, 304 (D.D.C. 2007). … Brown is serving two life sentences, after having been convicted by a jury of kidnapping and aggravated sexual abuse of a child, a ten-year-old daughter of friends. United States v.

Harris v. Board of Education

230 F. Supp. 3d 88 · District Court, E.D. New York · Feb 2, 2017

Brown v. … Sotomayor, 862 F.Supp.2d at 254 ; Browne v.

Clemente v. Philippine Airlines

614 F. Supp. 1196 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 9, 1985

In Anderson v. … In any event, the Civil Aeronautics Board has primary jurisdiction to determine the validity of a filed tariff. Danna v. Air France, 463 F.2d 407, 409 (2d Cir.1972).

Brown v. JC Penney Cas. Co.

649 F. Supp. 22 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Oct 22, 1986

649 F.Supp. 22 (1986) Johnie BROWN, Plaintiff, v. J.C. PENNEY CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant. No. 86-728C(B). United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, E.D. October 22, 1986. Donald Nangle, St. … To the same effect is Faygal v. Shelter Ins.

Brown v. W. R. McNeil, Inc.

52 F. Supp. 485 · District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · Nov 12, 1943

Brown v. Federal Bureau of Investigation

744 F. Supp. 2d 120 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 29, 2010

BACKGROUND The background of this case is discussed fully in Brown v. FBI, 675 F.Supp.2d 122 (D.D.C.2009). … Brown’s motion for leave to amend therefore will be denied also with respect to this proposed amendment. Cf . Adair v.

Brown v. Holy Name Church

80 F. Supp. 2d 1261 · District Court, D. Wyoming · Jan 20, 2000

Virginia Brown had to use crutches for a period of time after she was released from the hospital and I recall discussing with Virginia Brown the possibility of moving her classroom from the second floor of the building to … Brown Shoe Co., 110 F.3d 644 (8th Cir.1997); Guinan v. Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Indianapolis, 50 F.Supp.2d 845, 854 (S.D.Ind.1999).

Brown v. Pro Football, Inc.

821 F. Supp. 20 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 12, 1993

Ago v. Begg, Inc., 705 F.Supp. 613, 616 (D.D.C.1988), aff'd, 911 F.2d 819 (D.C.Cir.1990). … V. DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT. Defendants have requested that these motions be addressed at oral argument.

Gainor v. Douglas County, Georgia

59 F. Supp. 2d 1259 · District Court, N.D. Georgia · Sep 30, 1998

See Brown v. … Citing Brown v.

Nationwide Property & Casualty Insurance Co. v. Brown

260 F. Supp. 3d 864 · District Court, E.D. Michigan · Apr 24, 2017

Co. v. … Defendant Tamara Brown is the daughter-in-law of Defendant James Brown. (Dkt. #33-11, Pg. ID 733.) .

Brown v. Philippine President Lines, Inc.

704 F. Supp. 606 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 3, 1989

On December 22, 1985 plaintiff William Brown (“plaintiff”) was employed by United States Steel (“USX”) as a welder. … In Futo v. Lykes Bros.

Brown v. United States

377 F. Supp. 370 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Mar 6, 1974

Plaintiffs, DeWitt Brown and Othel F. … In Trotz v.

Brown v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

976 F. Supp. 729 · District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Jun 9, 1997

Restatement, supra, § 390; see Woodson v. Porter Brown Limestone Co., 916 S.W.2d 896, 907 (Tenn.1996). … The rule in Brown v. Harkleroad, 39 Tenn.App. 657 , 287 S.W.2d 92 (1956), limiting negligent entrustment suits to situations involving some sort of bailment, has been fiercely criticized. In Nichols v.

National Labor Relations Board v. State Labor Relations Board

99 F. Supp. 526 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 10, 1951

United States v. Yellow Cab Co., 332 U.S. 218 , 67 S.Ct. 1560 , 91 L.Ed. 2010 . … The proceeding before the State Board has reached a stage at which a remedy is about to be granted. The National Board is still in the early stages of its consideration of the matter.

Brown v. Greenfield, et al.

2002 DNH 066 · District Court, D. New Hampshire · Mar 26, 2002

Brown v. Greenfield, et a l . … See Brown v. Greenfield, 2001 DNH 03 9 (D.N.H. March 14, 2 001). See also Marquav v. Eno, 139 N.H. 708 (1995).

Bankruptcy Recovery Network v. Brown (In re Brown)

235 B.R. 644 · District Court, C.D. California · Apr 29, 1999

Brown no longer possessed the necklace. BRN could not offer to forbear reclamation of goods that Mr. Brown did not have. … See Diamontiney v. Borg, 918 F.2d 793, 797 (9th Cir.1990) (explaining that action based on reasonable interpretation of court’s order prevents application of contempt); Shuffler v.

Perez v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.

967 F. Supp. 920 · District Court, S.D. Texas · Jun 4, 1997

On this day came on to be considered Defendants Brown & William Tobacco Corp. (“B & W”), British American Tobacco Company, Ltd. (“British”), Philip Morris, Inc. (“Philip Morris”), R.J. … .”); Gordon v.

National News Board Co. v. Haverhill Box Board Co.

123 F. 409 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 28, 1903

Defendants must file a bond in the amount of $10,000, conditioned that, in the event of complainant’s finally prevailing in the suit, defendants will pay license fees of $1 per ton on all infringing board manufactured or … in the motion, and all other board which infringes the patent.