Case law

Frankel v. Commissioner of Education

480 F. Supp. 1156 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 8, 1979

Brown v. General Services Administration, 507 F.2d 1300 (2d Cir. 1974). … Richmond School Board, 416 U.S. 696, 711 , 94 S.Ct. 2006 , 40 L.Ed.2d 476 (1973). See Beazer v. N. Y. Transit Authority, 558 F.2d 97 (2d Cir. 1977); Brown v. General Services Administration, supra.

Coleman v. Brown

922 F. Supp. 2d 1004 · District Court, E.D. California · Apr 11, 2013

The first, Coleman v. Brown, began in 1990 and concerns California’s failure to provide constitutionally adequate mental health care to its mentally ill prison population. The second, Plata v. … All filings in this Three-Judge Court are included in the individual docket sheets of both Plata v. Brown, No. C01-1351 TEH (N.D.Cal.), and Coleman v. Brown, No. 90-cv-520-LKK (E.D.Cal.).

Midgley v. Rayrock Mines, Inc.

374 F. Supp. 2d 1039 · District Court, D. New Mexico · Jun 1, 2005

*1041 MEMORANDUM OPINION BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER came before the Court on Defendant ING’s Motion to Dismiss, filed March 25, 2004 (Doc. 10). 1 The primary issues were whether Plaintiff Bill L. … See Brown v. Zavaras, 63 F.3d 967, 969 (10th Cir.1995). Because ING attached one of the letters as an exhibit to the moving papers, there is no surprise, and Midgley has not alleged surprise.

Brown v. Tucci

960 F. Supp. 2d 544 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · May 20, 2013

Adler v. Board of Education, 342 U.S. 485, 492 , 72 S.Ct. 380 , 96 L.Ed. 517 (1952). … Weintraub v. Board of Education, 593 F.3d 196, 203 (2d Cir.2010).

Goehmann v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of

District Court, D. Kansas · May 28, 2025

July 28, 2010). 9 Lax v. Astrue, 489 F.3d 1080, 1084 (10th Cir. 2007) (first quoting Grogan v. Barnhart, 399 F.3d 1257, 1261 (10th Cir. 2005); and then quoting Williams v. … See Bills v. Comm’r, 748 F.

Sheils v. Bucks County Domestic Relations Section

921 F. Supp. 2d 396 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 31, 2013

Gibson v. … See Brown v. Muhlenberg Twp., 269 F.3d 205, 216 (3d Cir.2001) (“the elements of a supervisory liability claim ---- [require the] plaintiff ...

Brown v. Stallworth

235 F. Supp. 2d 453 · District Court, D. Maryland · Dec 12, 2002

Background Plaintiff Telaya V. … Choice Hotels Int’l, Inc. v. Madison Three, Inc., 23 F.Supp.2d 617 , 622 n. 4 (D.Md.1998) (citing Plant Genetic Sys., N.V. v. Ciba Seeds, 933 F.Supp. 519, 527 (M.D.N.C.1996); see Etienne v.

Woolfolk v. Brown

358 F. Supp. 524 · District Court, E.D. Virginia · Apr 23, 1973

Brewer v. School Board of City of Norfolk, 456 F.2d 943 (4th Cir. 1972); See Bradley v. School Board of City of Richmond, 472 F.2d 318 (4th Cir. 1972). … In Ojeda v.

Brown v. Beard

492 F. Supp. 2d 474 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 27, 2007

’s abuse of the judicial process); Brown v. … (denying appeal of prisoner civil rights case because not taken in good faith); Brown v. Federal *477 Laboratories, Inc., No. 89-507 (M.D.Fla.1989) (dismissing claim as frivolous); Brown v.

Brown v. Carlson

431 F. Supp. 755 · District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · May 6, 1977

I am aware, also, that in Sonnenberg v. … In Coats v.

Brown v. Hirst

322 F. Supp. 236 · District Court, W.D. Virginia · Feb 5, 1971

Brown was fired from his job with the Sanitation *237 Department of the City of Roanoke. … Hodgin v. Noland, 435 F.2d 859 (4th Cir. 1970).

Conant v. Brown

248 F. Supp. 3d 1014 · District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 29, 2017

Conant, appearing pro se, brings this voting rights action against Kate Brown, Governor of the State of Oregon, and Ellen Rosenbaum, Oregon’s Attorney General. … Ray v.

Aponte v. Brown & Brown of Fla., Inc.

382 F. Supp. 3d 1318 · District Court, M.D. Florida · May 23, 2019

R. 36-2 and I.O.P. 6. 13 Similarly, the Court is unpersuaded by Aponte's reliance on Parris v. Miami Herald Publishing Co. , 216 F.3d 1298 (11th Cir. 2000) and Strickland v. … Water Works and Sewer Board of City of Birmingham , 239 F.3d 1199 (11th Cir. 2001), as they were decided at the summary judgment stage. The Court also rejects Aponte's reliance on Paylor v.

Brown v. Ballas

331 F. Supp. 1033 · District Court, N.D. Texas · Jun 9, 1971

Miller v. International Paper Co., 408 F.2d 283 , 387 n. 18 (5th Cir. 1969). … Harris v. Orkin Exterminating Co., 293 F.Supp. 104, 105 (N.D.Ga.1968).

Woolfolk v. Brown

325 F. Supp. 1162 · District Court, E.D. Virginia · Apr 22, 1971

and members of the Local Welfare Board of Bedford County. … Rosado v.

Brown v. Bullock

194 F. Supp. 207 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 31, 1961

Futility of Demand on Fund’s Board of Directors. … v.

Brown v. Carr

236 F.R.D. 311 · District Court, S.D. Texas · May 22, 2006

See Pedraza v. Jones, 71 F.3d 194 , 196 n. 4 (5th Cir.1995); Hodge v. Prince, 730 F.Supp. 747, 751 (N.D.Tex.1990), aff'd mem. 923 F.2d 853 (5th Cir.1991). … See Tajeddini v. Gluch, 942 F.Supp. 772, 782 (D.Conn.1996) (“In forma pauperis status does not require the Government to advance funds to pay for deposition expenses.”); Fernandez v.

Brown v. Overton

4 F. Cas. 418 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 15, 1859

There was a conversation between the master and officers, and the only passenger on board, as to the necessity of going into that island; the question being whether, if they retained the libellant on board, mortification … There was no surgical skill on board, and the unceasing motion of the ship, and the accidents and discomforts to which he was necessarily exposed, were unfavorable to his cure.

Gomez v. Lozano

839 F. Supp. 2d 1309 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Mar 13, 2012

at 977-78 (holding that there was no clearly established law when suspect refused to allow officers to handcuff him and when suspect died after prolonged taser usage because precedent had not staked out a bright line); Brown … v.

Brown v. Apfel

71 F. Supp. 2d 28 · District Court, D. Rhode Island · Oct 27, 1999

V. … While it is true that in some cases written reports submitted by non-testifying, non-examining physicians cannot alone constitute substantial evidence, see Browne v.