Case law

Brown v. Greenfield, et al.

2001 DNH 039 · District Court, D. New Hampshire · Mar 1, 2001

Brown v . Greenfield, et a l . … CV-00-359-M 03/01/01 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Julie Brown, m/n/f of Christopher B., Plaintiff v.

Brown v. ASSOCIATED DISTRIBUTORS, INC.

715 F. Supp. 729 · District Court, E.D. Virginia · Jun 4, 1989

Both are thoroughly discussed in Orscheln Brothers Truck Lines, Inc. v. Zenith Electric Corp., 708 F.Supp. 845 1989 Fed.Carr.Cas. … This case is not a fate misclassification case as was INF, Ltd. v.

Brown v. Southwest Hotels, Inc.

50 F. Supp. 147 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Apr 2, 1943

The only reported case called to the attention of the Court or which the Court has found after a diligent search, on all *150 fours with the case at bar, is that of Prentiss Brown, Administrator, v. … This very point was urged in the case of Brown, Administrator v.

Shakespeare v. MetLife Legal Plans, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Jul 22, 2025

(citing Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989))). Pro se plaintiffs must still plead enough “factual matter, accepted as true, to ‘state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.’” Barnett v. … See Brown v. Matauszak, 415 F.

Brown v. County of San Joaquin

601 F. Supp. 653 · District Court, E.D. California · Jan 22, 1985

Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972); Goodisman v. Lytle, 724 F.2d 818 (9th Cir.1984); Powderly v. Schweiker, 704 F.2d 1092 (9th Cir.1983). … Sharpe, 347 U.S. 497, 499-500 [ 74 S.Ct. 693 , 98 L.Ed. 884 ]; Stanley v. Illinois, 405 U.S. 645 [ 92 S.Ct. 1208 , 31 L.Ed.2d 551 ]. Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. at 571-72 , 92 S.Ct. at 2705-706 .

Allen-Brown v. District of Columbia

174 F. Supp. 3d 463 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 2016

Currier v. Nat’l Bd. of Med. … Baird v. Gotbaum, 662 F.3d 1246, 1253 (D.C. Cir. 2011). See also Kelly v. LaHood, 840 F.

Fox v. BROWN MEMORIAL HOME, INC.

761 F. Supp. 2d 718 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jan 7, 2011

Brown Memorial is a nursing home facility which is governed by a Board of Directors. … Plaintiffs are former employees at *721 Brown Memorial. Ms. Fox and Mr. Fox worked at Brown — she from 1985, he from 1983 — until 2009, when the Board terminated their employment. Ms.

Brown & Root, Inc. v. United States

92 F. Supp. 257 · District Court, S.D. Texas · Jun 26, 1950

Normally the open culvert was marked at night by a barricade (consisting of a 2x4 or 2x6 board affixed to uprights) and by lighted flares. … If there is a difference in the quality of the negligence of Brown & Root, Inc. and Robinson (an additional consideration laid down in Wheeler v.

Sherrod v. Palm Beach County School District

424 F. Supp. 2d 1341 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Mar 26, 2006

Recognizing that “a single decision by the Board may constitute School Board policy,” KM. v. Sch. Bd. of Lee Cnty. … Bryan Cnty. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 410 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997).

Brown v. Coleman Investments, Inc.

993 F. Supp. 439 · District Court, M.D. Louisiana · Jan 23, 1998

Brown (“Brown”) and Lois N. … or in conformity with any interpretation or approval by an official or employee of the Federal Reserve System duly authorized by the Board to issue such interpretations or approval under such *445 procedures as the Board

Marcus Brown Holding Co. v. Pollak

272 F. 137 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 13, 1920

Vance v. W. A. Vandercock Co., 170 U. S. 468 , 18 Sup. Ct. 645, 42 L. Ed. 1111 ; North American T. & T. Co. v. Morrison, 178 U. S. 262 , 20 Sup. Ct. 869, 44 L. Ed. 1061 . … See, also, Simpson v. Geary (D. C.) 204 Fed. 507 ; Salander v. Tacoma (D. C.) 208 Fed. 427 . In Truax v. Raich, 239 U. S. 33 , 36 Sup. Ct. 7, 60 L. Ed. 131 , L. R. A. 1916D, 545, Ann.

Budro v. Brown & Root, Inc.

109 F.R.D. 619 · District Court, E.D. Texas · Mar 5, 1986

Scarborough v. Brown Group, Inc.

972 F. Supp. 1112 · District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Mar 11, 1997

In support of this argument, Brown Group relies upon Willis v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., 948 F.2d 305 (6th Cir.1991), and Austin v. Owens-Brockway Glass Container, Inc., 78 F.3d 875 (4th Cir.1996). … In Harris v.

Ibrahim v. Government of the Virgin Islands

47 V.I. 589 · District Court, Virgin Islands · Nov 3, 2005

Brown, 685 F.2d 834, 837-38 (3d Cir. 1982)) (noting with approval the elements as presented to the jury, although noting defect in charging instrument). … United States v.

Brown v. Pro Football, Inc.

846 F. Supp. 108 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 1, 1994

Brown v. Pro Football, Inc., 839 F.Supp. 905 (D.D.C.1993) ["Mem.Op.”]. 2 . The parties' agreement, read literally, asks this court to tax $150 per diem per witness. … Even if true, this does not disprove that the rates the Brown plaintiffs paid were still below market. 7 . The Laffey fee matrix was developed in Laffey v.

Brown v. Coleman Investments, Inc.

993 F. Supp. 432 · District Court, M.D. Louisiana · Jan 23, 1998

Brown (“Brown”) and Lois N. … Co. v. Travelers Ins. Co., 92 F.3d 336, 338 (5th Cir.1996); Rogers v. Int’l Marine Terminals, Inc., 87 F.3d 755 , 758 (5th Cir.1996). . Celotex Corp. v.

Doe v. Brooks Automation US LLC

District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Mar 27, 2025

Blue Cross Blue Shield of Mich., 825 F.3d 299, 305 (6th Cir. 2016) (recognizing “a ‘strong presumption in favor of openness’ as to court records” (quoting Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. … Shane Grp., 825 F.3d at 305 (quoting Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 710 F.2d at 1179).

Williams v. Enterprise Leasing Co. of Norfolk/Richmond

911 F. Supp. 988 · District Court, E.D. Virginia · Dec 29, 1995

Brown, 466 U.S. 147 , 148 n. 1, 104 S.Ct. 1723 , 1724 n. 1, 80 L.Ed.2d 196 (1984) (applying presumption to receipt of an EEOC right-to-sue notice). … A number of other federal appellate courts, however, have adopted a test for the applicability of the doctrine, originally set out in Berry v. Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State Univ., 715 F.2d 971 (5th Cir.1983).

Smith v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.

174 F.R.D. 90 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · May 22, 1997

Co. v. … Sam Brown Co., 19 F.3d 1259, 1265 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 989 , 115 S.Ct. 487 , 130 L.Ed.2d 399 (1994), and the jury that decides liability must also decide whether punitive damages are warranted, Panjwani v.

Currie v. Baxter, Brown & Co.

145 F.R.D. 66 · District Court, S.D. Mississippi · Nov 20, 1992

In Atkins v. … See Melancon v.