Case law

Brown v. Holiday Stationstores, Inc.

723 F. Supp. 396 · District Court, D. Minnesota · Oct 18, 1989

Brown, a Minnesota resident, was hired as a driver for defendant Holiday Station Stores, Inc., a Minnesota corporation doing business as Fairway Foods (Fairway). … Ry. v.

Brown v. Coen

209 F. Supp. 56 · District Court, D. Alaska · Oct 4, 1962

Browning, suggesting that it would seem to be incumbent upon him to request that plaintiff be ordered not to enter the base, which request was approved by Colonel Browning and forwarded by him to the Base Commander. … Howard v.

Coca-Cola Co. v. Brown

60 F.2d 319 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 19, 1932

In Coca-Cola Company v. Brown & Allen (D. C.) 274 F. 481, 482 , the court said: “He may also sweeten it by adding sugar, if that is desired by his customer, or he may similarly add anything else the customer desires. … In Elgin National Watch Company v. Illinois Watch Case Company, 179 U. S. 665 , 21 S. Ct. 270, 274 , 45 L.

Moorish Vanguard Concert v. Brown

498 F. Supp. 830 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 7, 1980

On February 28, 1980, this Court entered a default judgment against defendants James Brown, James Brown Productions and S & B Publishing Company in the amount of $12,585, plus costs and attorney fees. … City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corporation, 495 F.2d 448, 470 (2d Cir. 1974), quoting Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Hughes, 312 F.Supp. 478, 480 (S.D.N.Y.1970).

United States v. Brown

347 F. Supp. 2d 920 · District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 19, 2004

Brewer v. Williams, 430 U.S. 387, 404 , 97 S.Ct. 1232 , 51 L.Ed.2d 424 (1977). Courts must examine the totality of circumstances in determining the validity of a waiver. Moran v. … United States v. Betters, 229 F.Supp.2d 1103, 1107 (D.Or.2002).

Jell-O Co. v. Brown

3 F. Supp. 132 · District Court, W.D. Washington · Mar 5, 1926

See International Text-Book Co. v. Dist. of Col., 35 App. D. C. 307; also note in 22 A. L. R. 1484. These eases cited by the plaintiff are not persuasive. Brown v. Maryland, 12 Wheat. (25 U. S.) 419, 6 L. … Ed. 336 ; Rearick v. Pennsylvania, 203 U. S. 507 , 27 S. Ct. 159 , 51 L. Ed. 295 ; Stewart v. Michigan, 232 U. S. 665 , 34 S. Ct. 476 , 58 L. Ed. 786 ; Crenshaw v. Arkansas, 227 U. S. 389 , 33 S. Ct. 294 , 57 L.

Brown v. Tobriner

218 F. Supp. 754 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 11, 1963

Trotter, Commanding Officer Ninth Precinct recommending DISAPPROVAL of the application of Samuel Brown of 1507 Evarts Street, N. E., for a Rooming House License at 1147 Neal Street, N. E., in which I concur.” … Jurisdiction over appeals from denials of applications for renewals is clearly in the Board of Appeals and Review. Cf. Frazier v. Silver, D.C., 185 F.Supp. 625, 627-8 (1960), which dealt with revocation.

Brown v. Pro Football, Inc.

839 F. Supp. 905 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 13, 1993

Blum v. … Brown litigation.

Brown v. Office of State Comptroller

211 F. Supp. 3d 455 · District Court, D. Connecticut · Sep 29, 2016

and those acting with authority delegated by him were empowered to certify or decertify [the Board].” … Dist., 149 F.Supp.3d 300, 329 (E.D.N.Y. 2015) (evidence showed that defendant dominated the Board, which was responsible for the adverse action).

Farland v. Wall

91 F. Supp. 3d 74 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 12, 2015

Ruiz v. Bally Total Fitness Holding Corp., 496 F.3d 1, 5 (1st Cir.2007) (citing Rogan v. Menino, 175 F.3d 75, 77 (1st Cir.1999)). … See White v. Gittens, 121 F.3d 803 (1st Cir.1997); Connolly v. Arroyo, 293 Fed.Appx. 175, 177-78 (3rd Cir.2008). 3 Conclusion It is hereby Ordered that the: 1.

Brown v. Kayler

163 F. Supp. 508 · District Court, D. Alaska · Jul 8, 1958

In Walker v. Benjamin Foster Co., D.C., 92 F.Supp. 402 , the amended complaint contained the necessary allegations to overcome the presumption of prejudice. No such facts are pleaded here. In McDaniel v. … In Gardner v. Panama Railroad Co., 342 U.S. 29 , 72 S.Ct. 12 , 96 L.Ed. 31 , the petitioner had diligently sought redress and had twice within the year following her injuries brought suit.

McCracken v. Brown & Root, Inc.

101 F. Supp. 180 · District Court, W.D. Arkansas · Nov 20, 1951

Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. … In Gibbs v.

Brown v. Bowen

672 F. Supp. 1268 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Oct 30, 1987

McMillian v. Schweiker, 697 F.2d at 221 . … Brown’s testimony was not fully credible.

Kargbo v. Brown, et al.

2013 DNH 170 · District Court, D. New Hampshire · Dec 13, 2013

Kargbo v . Brown, et a l . 11-CV-130-SM 12/13/13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Abu B . … Booth v .

State Ex Rel. Brown v. Georgeoff

562 F. Supp. 1300 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · May 3, 1983

Before the Court are the motions to dismiss of Browning-Ferris Industries of Ohio (BFIO) and Browning-Ferris Industries of Pennsylvania (BFIP) (collectively, BFI). … Brown); id. at S 14,967 (daily ed. Nov. 24, 1980) (remarks of Sen. Stafford). This observation does not weaken Ohio and Justice’s argument.

Shelter Mutual Insurance v. Brown

345 F. Supp. 2d 645 · District Court, S.D. Mississippi · Jun 21, 2004

In Allstate Insurance Company v. … In Allstate Insurance Company v.

Brown v. MERROW MACHINE COMPANY

411 F. Supp. 1162 · District Court, D. Connecticut · Apr 1, 1976

On October 4, 1972, while she was operating a sewing machine manufactured by the defendant Merrow Machine Company, the plaintiff, Audry Brown, lost one of her eyes when the needle in the machine broke and she was struck by … Brown sustained her injury, and since that injury is allegedly the result of the violation by the defendant of its continuing duty to warn her of the danger of such an injury occurring, I hold that the allegations of the

Brown v. Cummins Distilleries Corp.

68 F. Supp. 985 · District Court, W.D. Kentucky · Jan 22, 1944

. *986 These motions raise the same questions as were raised by similar motions in the companion case of Prentiss Brown, Price Administrator v. … The plaintiff has filed a motion to strike Paragraphs IV, V, VI, VII and VIII of the answer of A. J. Cummins and so much of the answer of each of the defendants as adopted these paragraphs of the answer of A. J.

King v. Garrett

District Court, D. Nevada · Mar 30, 2020

Castille v. Peoples, 489 U.S. 346, 351 (1989); 12 Harris v. Reed, 489 U.S. 255, 263 n.9 (1989); see also Dickens v. … Brown v. McDaniel, 130 Nev. 565, 571–76, 331 P.3d 867, 871–75 (2014) (en banc). 1 a stay was appropriate because it provided the state courts with the first opportunity to resolve the 2 claim).

Brown v. County of Genesee

694 F. Supp. 250 · District Court, E.D. Michigan · Dec 8, 1987

Eaton Corp. v. Magnavox, 581 F.Supp. 1514, 1535 (E.D.Mich.1984); see also, U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty v. Black, 412 Mich. 99 , 313 N.W.2d 77 (1980). As noted, the representation must be false at the time that it was made. … Virzi v. Grand Trunk Warehouse and Cold Storage Co., 571 F.Supp. 507 (E.D. Mich.1983).