Case law

Florida Key Deer v. Brown

364 F. Supp. 2d 1345 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Mar 29, 2005

Greenpeace v. … Nat’l Wildlife Fed’n v.

Brown v. Morgan County, Ala.

518 F. Supp. 661 · District Court, N.D. Alabama · Aug 26, 1981

In Brazier v. … Robertson v.

McAllister v. Brown

419 F. Supp. 588 · District Court, N.D. Georgia · Aug 26, 1976

In the case of Payne v. … In the case of Sykes v.

Brown v. City of Oneonta

160 F.R.D. 18 · District Court, N.D. New York · Feb 6, 1995

Brown v. Oneonta, 160 F.R.D. 18 , No. 93-CV-349 (N.D.N.Y.1995) (Discovery Order). … See Brown v. Oneonta, 93-349 (N.D.N.Y. February 11, 1994) (Pl. Aff. Ex. “H” at 2).

Brown v. United States

547 F. Supp. 2d 759 · District Court, W.D. Kentucky · Feb 27, 2008

Blackburn v. United States, 100 F.3d 1426, 1430 (9th Cir.1996); Valdez v. … Similarly, in Reetz v.

United Pacific Insurance v. Brown

240 F. Supp. 223 · District Court, D. Oregon · Apr 16, 1965

Brown. … City of Myrtle Point v.

Prosser v. Elections Board

793 F. Supp. 859 · District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · Jun 2, 1992

Gaffney v. Cummings, 412 U.S. 735, 752-53 , 93 S.Ct. 2321, 2331 , 37 L.Ed.2d 298 (1973); see also Davis v. Bandemer, supra; Peter H. … The counties of Door and Kewaunee. (2) Brown county. That part of the county of Brown consisting of the towns of Green Bay, Humboldt and Scott.

Texarkana National Bank v. Brown

920 F. Supp. 706 · District Court, E.D. Texas · Mar 8, 1996

Brown (the “Brown Trust”) and (2) a declaration that it had neither breached its duties as trustee nor been negligent in the administration of the trust. … The jury found that TNB breached its trust obligations under the Brown Trust and was negligent in the management of the Brown Trust.

Brown v. Ortho Diagnostic Systems, Inc.

868 F. Supp. 168 · District Court, E.D. Virginia · Nov 22, 1994

Meeker v. Kercher, 782 F.2d 153 (10th Cir.1986); 9 Osei-Afriyie *171 v. Medical College of Pa., 937 F.2d 876 (3d Cir.1991); Cheung v. Youth Orchestra Foundation of Buffalo, 906 F.2d 59 (2d Cir.1990). Accord Lawson v. … See, e.g., Herrera-Venegas v.

Stevenson v. Pennsylvania State Police

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 16, 2023

See Domino’s Pizza, Inc. v. … App’x 193, 196- 97 (3d Cir. 2014) (nonprecedential) (citing, inter alia, Stewart, 120 F.3d at 432) (same); Anderson v. Wachovia Mortg. Corp., 621 F.3d 261, 267-68 (3d Cir. 2010) (citing, inter alia, Brown v. J.

Brown v. Mobile County Commissioners

79 F. Supp. 3d 1259 · District Court, S.D. Alabama · Jan 7, 2015

and November 7, 2013, you [Brown] created Mobile County purchase orders to vendors for items that you [Brown] needed for your [Brown’s] own personal use.” ■ Brown appealed her termination to the Personnel Board. 22 The Personnel … .”); Maniccia v. Brown, 171 F.3d 1364, 1370 (11th Cir.1999) (citing Conner v.

Totten v. Kellogg Brown & Root, LLC

152 F. Supp. 3d 1243 · District Court, C.D. California · Jan 22, 2016

The Fifth Circuit disagreed with the Board’s finding that the class action waiver in the arbitration agreement violated the NLRA. See also Murphy Oil USA, Inc. v. … Concrete Prods. v. General Truck Drivers, Office, Food & Warehouse Union, Local 952, 353 F.3d 668, 678 (9th Cir.2003) (sympathy strike to support workers engaged in primary strike); Brown & Root, Inc. v.

Brown v. Penrod Drilling Co.

534 F. Supp. 696 · District Court, W.D. Louisiana · Apr 14, 1982

Glen Austin Brown filed suit against Penrod Drilling Company (Penrod) and Offshore Casing Crews, Inc. … The V-door ramp is a 6 foot wide board, placed at an incline between the V-door and the pipe rack underneath the load of casing.

United States v. Brown

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 20, 2022

Brown’s Pro Se Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 40 (“Repl.”) … See United States v. Brown, 2:21- mj-30325 (E.D. Mich. July 1, 2021) (minute entry).

Brown v. Pro Football, Inc.

812 F. Supp. 237 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 2, 1992

Circuit’s holding in Smith v. Pro Football, Inc., 593 F.2d 1173 (D.C.Cir.1978). In Smith , a professional football player challenged the NFL’s player draft as viola-tive of § 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act. … Defendants’ Motion to Reconsider is grounded on defendants’ reading oí the Supreme Court’s opinion in NCAA v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma, 468 U.S. 85 , 104 S.Ct. 2948 , 82 L.Ed.2d 70 (1984).

Brown v. American Arbitration Ass'n

717 F. Supp. 195 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 11, 1989

Brown (“Brown”), James Hopkins and John Hayes. … Brown (“Brown”) sought appointment of an election arbitrator by the AAA to decide election challenges. The AAA declined plaintiff’s request.

Brown v. Crown Equipment Corp.

445 F. Supp. 2d 59 · District Court, D. Maine · Aug 9, 2006

United States v. W.B., 452 F.3d 1002, 1006 (8th Cir.2006). Rule 807 is to be used “only rarely, in truly exceptional cases.” United States v. … She invokes the collateral source rule, citing Hoitt v. Hall, 661 A.2d 669, 673-74 (Me.1995), and Werner v. Lane, 393 A.2d 1329, 1336 (Me.1978). Id. at 2.

Brown v. Grant Holding, LLC

394 F. Supp. 2d 1090 · District Court, D. Minnesota · Aug 2, 2005

Paul v. … Corp. v.

Hatfield v. Brown & Root, Inc.

245 F. Supp. 733 · District Court, E.D. Texas · Sep 29, 1965

Superior Oil Co. v. Trahan, 322 F.2d 234 (5th Cir. 1963), Tate v. C. G. Willis, Inc., 154 F.Supp. 402 (E.D. Va.1957). 14. … Superior Oil Co. v. Trahan, supra. The unseaworthiness of the vessel as well as the combined negligence of the Libellant and Respondent caused Li-bellant’s injuries and resulting disability. 3.

Olds v. Brown Shoe Co.

25 F. Supp. 880 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Dec 29, 1938

It charges the defendant Brown Shoe Company and Riley Poison, Superintendent of that company’s Moberly, Mo., shoe factory, with negligently requiring plaintiff to work in a place and under conditions which were unhealthy … Jewell v. Kansas City Bolt & Nut Co., 231 Mo. 176 , 132 S.W. 703 , 140 Am.St.Rep. 515 ; Clark v. C., R. I. & P. Ry. Co., D.C., 194 F. 505 ; Brunski v. Ford Motor Co., D.C., 299 F. 807 ; Davis v.