Case law

Brown v. Apfel

991 F. Supp. 1232 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jan 27, 1998

Brown contends that the notices of determination of May 10,1984 and of July 26, 1984 were deficient under Gonzalez v. … Brown has the burden of providing the evidence needed to establish her entitlement to reopen. See Panages v. Bowen, 871 F.2d 91, 93 (9th Cir.1989), citing Kail v.

Brown v. United States

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 7, 2011

Code § 23-110(g); see Williams v. Martinez, 586 F.3d 995, 998 (D.C. … .”); Byrd v. Henderson, 119 F.3d 34, 36-37 (D.C.

Brown v. Insurograph, Inc.

90 F. Supp. 828 · District Court, D. Delaware · May 1, 1950

See also White v. Bruce Co., D.C.Del, 62 F. Supp. 577 . … Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Oo. v. Formica Insul. Co., 266 U.S. 342 , 45 S.Ct. 117 , 69 L.Ed. 316 ; and see Scott Paper Co. v. Marcalus Co., 326 U. S, 249, 66 S.Ct. 101 , 90 L.Ed. 47 .

Investors Capital Corp. v. Brown

145 F. Supp. 2d 1302 · District Court, M.D. Florida · May 21, 2001

Volt Information Sciences v. Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior University, 489 U.S. 468, 478 , 109 S.Ct. 1248, 1255 , 103 L.Ed.2d 488 (1989). … See, e:g., Miller v.

Brown v. United States

573 F. Supp. 740 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Aug 26, 1982

Far more persuasive is the decision on similar facts in Hill v. Schweiker, 532 F.Supp. 1014 (D.N.H.1982). … Brown would have given rise to any duty under Alabama law of Social Security personnel to disclose or warn Mr. Brown. See Aretz v.

Brown v. Access Hollywood

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 4, 2011

In Neitzke v. … Denton v. Hernandez, 504 U.S. 25, 33 (1992). Mindful that a complaint filed by a pro se litigant is held to a less stringent standard than that applied to a formal pleading drafted by a lawyer, see Haz'nes v.

Brown v. Smith

993 F. Supp. 165 · District Court, W.D. New York · Feb 4, 1998

Plaintiff previously filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 , in the United States District Court, Southern District of New York, (Brown v. … In Heck v.

Brown v. McCarey

33 F. Supp. 1000 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 11, 1939

Parry v. First National Bank of Lansford, 270 Pa. 556 , 113 A. 847 . … First National Bank v. Farrell, 3 Cir., 272 F. 371 ; Leather Mfg. Nat. Bank v. Morgan, 117 U.S. 96 , 6 S.Ct. 657 , 29 L.Ed. 811 .

Chatham Steel Corp. v. Brown

858 F. Supp. 1130 · District Court, N.D. Florida · Jul 19, 1994

Brown and Mandy Sapp — “Owner and Operator” liability Before addressing the arguments of the battery-seller defendants, the Court first assesses the liability of C. Brown and Mandy Sapp. … As former owners of the Site, Brown and Mandy Sapp are liable under § 107(a)(2).

Brown v. Magness Co., Inc.

617 F. Supp. 571 · District Court, S.D. Texas · Aug 27, 1985

Plaintiff testified that he was not profiting from his operation of Brown’s Exxon Service Center II. 7. … Lasko v. Consumers Petroleum of Connecticut, Inc., 547 F.Supp. 211 (D.Conn.1981).

Brown v. Laird

329 F. Supp. 242 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 8, 1971

See United States v. Brown, 423 F.2d 751, 754 (3rd Cir. 1970). Major Leedom also stated as a reason that the books from which the applicant drew his beliefs were recommended to him. This fact on its face is irrelevant. … The military Board appears from its report to have been diligent in its efforts to evaluate Private Brown’s application and in drawing its conclusions.

Brown v. Murphy

355 F. Supp. 416 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 29, 1973

People v. Brown, No. 5513/71 (Sup.Ct.N.Y.Co. December 4, 1972). The relief requested by plaintiff in the present motion must be denied. … In Younger v.

Brown v. C.R. Bard, Inc.

942 F. Supp. 2d 549 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 26, 2013

Balazik v. Cnty. of Dauphin, 44 F.3d 209, 213 (3d Cir.1995). … In Bouldry v. C.R.

Brown v. United States

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 26, 2011

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSEPH ANTHONY BROWN, … See 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a); Starnes v. McGuire, 512 F.2d 3 918, 932 (D.C.

Brown v. Brierley

316 F. Supp. 236 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 23, 1970

In particular, plaintiff relies upon the case of Sostre v. Rockefeller, 312 F.2d 863 (S.D.N.Y.1970), decided May 14, 1970. … In the Sostre case, supra, and in the case of Wright v.

Morris v. Brown

521 F. Supp. 444 · District Court, M.D. Louisiana · Sep 10, 1981

. § 1983 against Ossie Brown, the District Attorney for the Parish of East Baton Rouge, and J. A1 Amiss, the Sheriff of East Baton Rouge Parish. … prosecution have made it clear that in view of the “fundamental policy against federal interference with state criminal prosecutions, even irreparable injury is insufficient unless it is ‘both great and immediate.’ ” Younger v.

Dart v. Brown

531 F. Supp. 135 · District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Feb 3, 1982

In Jenness v. … Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. Murgia, 427 U.S. 307 , 96 S.Ct. 2562 , 49 L.Ed.2d 520 (1976). The Court’s task in this case is to simply determine whether the law has a rational basis.

Bradley v. School Board

315 F. Supp. 325 · District Court, E.D. Virginia · Jun 20, 1970

See United States v. Board of Public Instruction of Polk County, Florida, 395 F.2d 66 (5 Cir. 1968). The defendant school board, as this Court interprets the law of this Circuit as enunciated in Swann v. … Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education, 431 F.2d 138 (4th Cir., May 26, 1970), and Green v.

Brown v. Apfel

996 F. Supp. 922 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Feb 2, 1998

Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. at 401 ; Jernigan v. Sullivan, 948 F.2d 1070 , 1073 n. 5 (8th Cir. 1991). … V.

Brown v. City of Milwaukee

288 F. Supp. 2d 962 · District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · Oct 21, 2003

Bd. of Comm’rs of Bryan County v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 411 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997); see also Gable v. City of Chicago, 296 F.3d 531, 537 (7th Cir.2002). … Brown, 520 U.S. at 407 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 .