Case law

Brown v. Consolidated Fisheries Co.

18 F.R.D. 433 · District Court, D. Delaware · Dec 19, 1955

As said by Justice Woodbury in 1846 in Hathaway v. … Co. v.

Brown v. Callahan

552 F. Supp. 461 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Dec 23, 1982

Commonwealth v. Brown, 9 Mass.App. 609 , 403 N.E.2d 424 . The Appeals Court denied a petition for rehearing, and on May 29, 1980 the Supreme Judicial Court denied further appellate review. … In Engle v.

Brown v. Clark Equipment Co.

96 F.R.D. 166 · District Court, D. Maine · Nov 24, 1982

Hurd v. … Brown (hereafter “plaintiff”) was seriously injured while using a front-end loader designed and manufactured by defendant Clark Equipment Company.

Brown & Root, Inc. v. LaBauve

219 F. Supp. 179 · District Court, W.D. Louisiana · Aug 7, 1962

Suffice it to say that in my opinion LSA :R.S. 23:921, Jones v. Ernst, 172 La. 406 , 134 So. 375 ; Cavanah v. Ebert, 157 La. 103 , 102 So. 84 ; Baton Rouge Cigarette Service, Inc. v. … Comstock, 8 Cir., 121 F. 620 , 61 L.R.A. 176 ; Connelly v. Special Road & Bridge Dist., 99 Fla. 456 , 126 So. 794 , 71 A.L.R. 923 ; Essex Trust Co. v.

Brown v. United States

152 F. Supp. 107 · District Court, S.D. California · Jun 4, 1957

. *108 V That the said first trust deed was recorded prior to the second trust deed.

DeSantis v. New Jersey Transit

103 F. Supp. 3d 583 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 29, 2015

See Miller v. … V.

United States v. Brown

24 F. Cas. 1261 · District Court, D. California · Sep 18, 1855

The grant and papers in many particulars closely resemble those in the case of Luco v. U. S. … Under these circumstances the eourt would have had no hesitation in affirming the decree of the board by rejecting the claim as spurious.

United States v. Brown

580 F. Supp. 2d 518 · District Court, W.D. Virginia · Oct 7, 2008

A state warrant was subsequently issued for Brown’s arrest. … United States v. Grady, 544 F.2d 598, 601 (2d Cir.1976); United States v. Lotory, 409 F.Supp.2d 732, 739 (W.D.Va.2006); see also United States v.

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Acosta

District Court, D. Puerto Rico · Dec 1, 2021

(quoting Meyer v. Brown & Root Constr. Co., 661 F.2d 369, 373 (5th Cir. 1981))). … V.

United States v. Brown

274 F. Supp. 3d 794 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Apr 4, 2017

Nov. 1, 2007); United States v. Reddy, 500 F.Supp.2d 877, 882-84 (N.D. Ill. 2007); United States v. Steverson, No. 1:07-CV-1142-JBM, 2007 WL 2380011 , at *4 (N.D. Ill. May 1, 2007); United States v. … See Kaun, 827 F.2d at 1149 -50 (quoting S.E.C. v. Holschuh, 694 F.2d 130, 144 (7th Cir. 1982)); see also United States v. Raymond, 228 F.3d 804 , 813 (7th Cir. 2000), overruled, on other grounds by Hill v.

Brown v. City of Atlanta

284 F. Supp. 3d 1326 · District Court, N.D. Georgia · Jan 9, 2018

Craig v. Floyd Cty., Ga. , 643 F.3d 1306 , 1311 (11th Cir. 2011). But that is not all that Brown has presented. … Reed v. DeKalb Cty. , 264 Ga.App. 83 , 589 S.E.2d 584 , 588 (2003). The court finds that Brown has not met his burden here. Rather than providing evidence of actual malice, Brown relies on Lagroon v.

Brown v. Brown (In re McCracken)

111 B.R. 544 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Apr 6, 1989

United States v. United States Gypsum Co., 333 U.S. 364 , 68 S.Ct. 525 , 92 L.Ed. 746 (1948). … The dispute concerns 37 acres of a larger parcel of property owned by William Jeter Brown Jr. and Silba Ann Brown, the Debtors, which they purchased from the McCrackens in 1983.

Brown v. Castleton State College

663 F. Supp. 2d 392 · District Court, D. Vermont · Oct 7, 2009

In Washington v. … Pauk v.

Brown v. United States

226 F. Supp. 968 · District Court, S.D. California · Feb 26, 1964

Brown v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 15, 2025

See Brown v. District of Columbia (“Brown III”), 761 F. … Brown v. District of Columbia (“Brown II”), 928 F.3d 1070, 1079 (D.C. Cir. 2019).

Brown v. Weinberger

384 F. Supp. 842 · District Court, N.D. Texas · Nov 21, 1974

Brown’s claim was supported by “substantial evidence”, a standard which calls for more than a “scintilla of evidence”, enough for a reasonable mind to accept as adequate support. See, Breaux v. … Finch, 421 F.2d 687 (5th Cir. 1970) and Hemphill v. Weinberger, 483 F.2d 1137, 1139 (5th Cir. 1973). I. Mrs. Brown’s Medical History Mrs. Brown’s medical history is as well chronicled as a trial transcript.

United States v. Brown

894 F. Supp. 1150 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jul 19, 1995

See Kotteakos v. … United States v.

United States v. Brown

7 Alaska 39 · District Court, D. Alaska · Mar 14, 1923

search any private dwelling occupied as such, unless it is being used for the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor, or unless it is in part used for some business purpose such as a store, shop, saloon, restaurant, hotel or boarding … The term ‘private dwelling’ shall be construed to include the room or rooms used and occupied, not transiently, but solely as a residence in an apartment house, hotel, or boarding house.”

Brown v. Ford Motor Co.

67 F. Supp. 2d 581 · District Court, E.D. Virginia · Oct 12, 1999

Freeman v. … Barron v.

Brown v. Rose

378 F. Supp. 902 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Jan 18, 1973

. * * * Thompson v. … Darr v. Burford (1950), 339 U.S. 200, 204 , 70 S.Ct. 587, 590 , 94 L.Ed. 761 .