Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersFD

10,000+ results

1.72s

  • Brown v. Sullivan

    771 F. Supp. 278 · District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · Aug 16, 1991

    The plaintiff, Elee Brown, has filed an action ostensibly appealing an adverse administrative decision of the Secretary of Health and Human Services. … Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 , 109 S.Ct. 1827, 1831-32 , 104 L.Ed.2d 338 (1989). The plaintiffs statement of claim provides as follows: I am filed for disability insurance.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States v. Brown

    24 F. Cas. 1250 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 19, 1830

    Lee v. Coleshill, Cro. … In the case of Bolton v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • United States v. Brown

    673 F. Supp. 425 · District Court, D. Kansas · Nov 6, 1987

    See Brown v. United States, 610 F.2d 672, 676-76 (9th Cir.1980); United States v. Leonard, 689 F.2d 470 (9th Cir.1979); Farrow v. United States, 580 F.2d 1339, 1358 (9th Cir. 1978) (era banc). See also Smith v. … Dutton v. Brown, 812 F.2d 593, 597 (10th Cir.1987), cert, denied sub nom. Dutton v. Maynard, — U.S. —, 108 S.Ct. 116 , 98 L.Ed.2d 74 (1987). United States v. Pinkney, 551 F.2d 1241 (D.C.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • British Airways Board v. National Mediation Board

    533 F. Supp. 150 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jan 7, 1982

    Air Line Pilots Ass’n. v. Texas International Airlines, 656 F.2d 16, 20 n.6 (2d Cir. 1981), citing, Switchman’s Union v. National Mediation Board, 320 U.S. 297 , 64 S.Ct. 95 , 88 L.Ed. 61 (1943). … National Mediation Board, Dkt.No. 79-4265 (9th Cir. July 24, 1981) (unpublished); Sedalia-Marshall-Boonville Stage Line, Inc. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Town of Eustis

    293 F. 197 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Oct 10, 1923

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Henderson v. Brown

    20 F. Supp. 522 · District Court, W.D. Louisiana · Mar 20, 1937

    transferred and applying the same to the indebtedness assumed by the latter; that the contract, among other things, provided that, of the three liquidating commissioners of the old bank, any two could be members of the board … It is substantially the same as that sought in the case of Wittnebel v. Loughman (C.C.A.) 80 F.(2d) 222 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Englander, et al.

    2012 DNH 095 · District Court, D. New Hampshire · Jun 1, 2012

    Brown v . … S o , to prevail on his constitutional claims, Brown must provide expert medical testimony. See, e.g., Robinson v . Hager, 292 F.3d 5 6 0 , 564 (8th Cir. 2002); Boring v .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • United States v. Brown

    436 F. Supp. 998 · District Court, E.D. Michigan · Sep 25, 1974

    Elkins v. United States, 364 U.S. 206, 223-24 , 80 S.Ct. 1437 , 4 L.Ed.2d 1669 (1960); United States v. Beigel, 370 F.2d 751, 756 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 387 U.S. 930 , 87 S.Ct. 2049 , 18 L.Ed.2d 989 (1967). … In Schneckloth v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Gingiss International, Inc.

    360 F. Supp. 1042 · District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · Aug 1, 1973

    M/S Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co., 407 U.S. 1 , 92 S.Ct. 1907 , 32 L.Ed.2d 513 (1972). … Marco Milling Co. v. Commercial Services of Texas, Inc., 346 S.W.2d 495 (Tex.Civ.App., 1961); see also Associates Financial Services Co. v. Eisenberg, 51 Wis.2d 85 , 186 N. W.2d 272 (1971).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brown v. United States

    569 F. Supp. 2d 596 · District Court, W.D. Virginia · Jul 30, 2008

    United States v. Gaubert, 499 U.S. 315, 325 , 111 S.Ct. 1267 , 113 L.Ed.2d 335 (1991); see also Baum v. … See also Cohen v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. E.F. Hutton Group

    735 F. Supp. 1196 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 8, 1990

    Cosmas v. Hassett, id.; DiVittorio v. … See Cosmas v.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Unique Concepts, Inc. v. Brown

    735 F. Supp. 145 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 4, 1990

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Westport Finance Company

    145 F. Supp. 265 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Oct 29, 1956

    Alropa Corp. v. Smith, 240 Mo.App. 376 , 199 S.W.2d 866 ; Turner v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas R. Co., 346 Mo. 28 , 142 S.W.2d 455 , 129 A.L.R. 829 ; and Christ-ner v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co., 228 Mo. … Jacobs v. Greening, 109 Kan. 674 , 202 P. 72 ; Root Grain Co. v. Livengood, 151 Kan. 706 , 100 P.2d 714 Bratton v. Exchange State Bank, 129 Kan. 82 , 281 P. 857 ; and Ahring v. White, 156 Kan. 60 , 131 P.2d 699 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Brown v. General Electric Co.

    584 F. Supp. 1305 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jul 11, 1983

    Lamb v. Wedgewood South Corp., 308 N.C. 419 , 302 N.E.2d 868 (1983). In addition, Bolick v. … See Tims v. Kerr Lake Country Club, Inc., No. 83-53-CIV-5 (E.D.N.C. 8 July 1983). This action is hereby dismissed. AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Hannum

    50 F. Supp. 697 · District Court, W.D. Texas · Jul 19, 1943

    Walling v. Shenandoah-Dives Mining Co., 10 Cir., March, 1943, 134 F.2d 395, 397 ; Walling v. T. Buettner & Co., 7 Cir., Feb. 1943, 133 F.2d 306, 308 ; United States v. … C., 41 F.Supp. 833 ; Fleming v. Phipps, D.C., 35 F.Supp. 627 ; Brown v. O’Connor, D.C., 49 F.Supp. 973 ; Henderson v. J. B. Beaird Corporation, D.C., 48 F.Supp. 252 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Molloy

    63 F. Supp. 822 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 10, 1944

    Henderson v. Burd, 2 Cir., 133 F.2d 515 , 146 A.L.R. 714 ; Brown v. Bernstein, D.C.Pa.1943, 49 F.Supp. 497 . … Henderson v. J. B. Beaird Corp., D.C., 48 F.Supp. 252 . In Brown, Administrator, v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. United States

    861 F. Supp. 539 · District Court, W.D. Louisiana · Jun 17, 1994

    On November 10,1991, plaintiff Brown drove to the Post Office to get his mail. … Brown Tr., at 64. 3 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Crane Co.

    125 F. 34 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Oct 13, 1903

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Norman v. Brown, Todd & Heyburn

    693 F. Supp. 1259 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · May 5, 1988

    Section 17(a) does not explicitly authorize civil actions. 1 Defendant Brown, Todd & Heyburn argues that Counts I, III, and V must be dismissed because there is no private right of action under section 17(a). … See Eastern Corporate Federal Credit Union v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co., 639 F.Supp. 1532 (D.Mass.1986). Defendant Brown, Todd & Heyburn’s motion to dismiss Counts IX and X will be ALLOWED. 3.

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Rocha v. Brown & Gould, LLP

    101 F. Supp. 3d 52 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 30, 2015

    See COMPTEL v. FCC, 945 F. … Rocha cites Hedgepeth v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.