Case law

Abyaneh v. Merchants Bank, North

667 F. Supp. 198 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 21, 1986

In support, plaintiffs and Merchants rely on the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals’ decision in Brown v. … Plaintiffs reliance upon Brown v.

Murphy v. Zoning Commission of Town of New Milford

223 F. Supp. 2d 377 · District Court, D. Connecticut · Aug 30, 2002

Holding Corp. v. Planning & Zoning Board, 167 Conn. 182, 184-85 , 355 A.2d 91 (1974); Farina v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 157 Conn. 420, 422 , 254 A.2d 492 (1969). … Connecticut Sand & Stone Corp. v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 150 Conn. 439, 442 , 190 A.2d 594 (1963). See also generally Courtney v. Planning & Zoning Comm'n, No.

Hawkins v. Holder

597 F. Supp. 2d 4 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 8, 2009

In support of this theory, Hawkins relies on a series of cases from the Merit Systems Protection Board (the “Board”) and the Federal Circuit. See Pl.’s Cross-Mot. at 14-16; Pl.’s Opp’n at 39. … Brown v. Small, 437 F.Supp.2d 125 , 130 n. 7 (D.D.C. 2006) (emphasis in original) (citing Randle v. LaSalle Telecomms., Inc., 876 F.2d 563, 569 (7th Cir.1989)).

Federal Deposit Insurance v. Henderson

849 F. Supp. 495 · District Court, E.D. Texas · Apr 11, 1994

Henderson falsified board of director minutes, it does not appear that the FDIC is stating a claim for fraud. The Fifth Circuit and three district courts recently rendered six decisions in similar cases. RTC v. … Do you find, from a preponderance of the evidence, that a majority of the board of directors adversely dominated Southland Savings from 1984 to August 18, 1986? V. TEXAS HOUSE BILL 1076 As in FDIC v.

Rodriguez v. Torres

60 F. Supp. 2d 334 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jun 30, 1999

The Third Circuit reviewed the Supreme Court’s opinions in Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563 , 88 S.Ct. 1731 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968), Elrod v. … See Azzaro, 110 F.3d at 981; see also Lombardi 7 F.Supp.2d at 497 (citing Romano v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 284 N.J.Super. 543 , *353 544, 665 A.2d 1139 (App.Div.1995)).

Banks v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n

746 F. Supp. 850 · District Court, N.D. Indiana · Aug 17, 1990

NCAA v. Board of Regents of Oklahoma University, 468 U.S. at 104 , 104 S.Ct. at 2961-62; Lektro-Vend Corp. v. … NCAA v. Board of Regents, 468 U.S. at 109 -110 and n. 42, 104 S.Ct. at 2965 and n. 42. 13 .

United States v. Dahlquist

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 22, 2025

See Brown v. Amtrak Corp., No. 03-7003, 2003 WL 22433755, at *1 (D.C. Cir. Oct. 27, 2023) (“A dismissal ‘with prejudice’ is a final judgment on the merits which bars further litigation between the same parties.” … Supp. 3d 132, 145 (D.D.C. 2015) (noting that dismissal with prejudice “reflect[s] on the merits of the underlying action” (quoting Brown v. Carr, 503 A.2d 1241, 1245 (D.C. Cir. 1986), and citing Kenley v.

United States v. Guardino

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 23, 2025

See Brown v. Amtrak Corp., No. 03-7003, 2003 WL 22433755, at *1 (D.C. Cir. Oct. 27, 2023) (“A dismissal ‘with prejudice’ is a final judgment on the merits which bars further litigation between the same parties.” … See also Thorp v. District of Columbia, 142 F. Supp. 3d 132, 145 (D.D.C. 2015) (noting that dismissal with prejudice “reflect[s] on the merits of the underlying action” (quoting Brown v.

Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. National Labor Relations Board

856 F. Supp. 2d 778 · District Court, D. South Carolina · Apr 13, 2012

NLRB v. Brown, 380 U.S. 278, 291 , 85 S.Ct. 980 , 13 L.Ed.2d 839 (1965). III. DISCUSSION Defendants argue that the rule is a proper exercise of the Board’s rulemaking authority under Section 6 of the Act. … Chevron Step One The question presented under Chevron step one is whether Congress delegated authority to the Board to regulate employers in this manner. 5 See Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v.

Brown & Brown, Inc. v. Ali

494 F. Supp. 2d 943 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jun 25, 2007

Mazurek v. … Co. of Am. v.

United States v. Sidow

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 22, 2025

See Brown v. Amtrak Corp., No. 03-7003, 2003 WL 22433755, at *1 (D.C. Cir. Oct. 27, 2023) (“A dismissal ‘with prejudice’ is a final judgment on the merits which bars further litigation between the same parties.” … See also Thorp v. District of Columbia, 142 F. Supp. 3d 132, 145 (D.D.C. 2015) (noting that dismissal with prejudice “reflect[s] on the merits of the underlying action” (quoting Brown v.

Swann v. Gastonia Housing Authority

502 F. Supp. 362 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Nov 25, 1980

The question of a tenant’s property interest in the tenancy at the expiration of the lease term is governed by the entitlement guidelines set out by the Supreme Court in Board of Regents v. … In Joy v.

Soloway v. Weger

389 F. Supp. 409 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 5, 1974

While the determination of parole eligibility is wholly within the discretion of the Board of Parole, United States v. … In Morrissey v.

BDH LLC v. Outdoor Product Innovations Inc

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · Mar 25, 2025

See United States v. Sanford- Brown, Ltd., 788 F.3d 696, 713 (7th Cir. 2015) (vacated on other grounds, United States ex rel. Nelson v. Sanford-Brown, Ltd., 136 S. Ct. 2506 (2016)). II. … V. Defendants’ Motion to Restrict Documents from Public View (Dkt.

Kay v. Mills

490 F. Supp. 844 · District Court, E.D. Kentucky · Nov 25, 1980

Wadmond, 401 U.S. 154 , 91 S.Ct. 720 , 27 L.Ed.2d 749 (1971) (admission to bar); Gerende v. Board of Supervisors, supra, note 10 (candidacy for public office); Baggett v. … Baggett v. Bullitt, 377 U.S. 360 , 84 S.Ct. 1316 , 12 L.Ed.2d 377 (1964); Cramp v. Board of Public Instruction, 368 U.S. 278 , 82 S.Ct. 275 , 7 L.Ed.2d 285 (1961). 15 . Yick Wo v.

Brown & Brown, Inc. v. Ali

592 F. Supp. 2d 1009 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jan 7, 2009

See Brown & Brown v. Ali, 494 F.Supp.2d 943 (N.D.Ill.2007). … Barbara’s Sales, Inc. v. Intel Carp., 227 Ill.2d 45 , 316 Ill.Dec. 522 , 879 N.E.2d 910, 919 (2007). 2. An Illinois appellate court case decided in March 2008, Brown & Brown, Inc. v.

Brown v. Ferroni (In re Brown)

505 B.R. 638 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 24, 2014

Linda Brown is a homemaker and a volunteer special education teacher. The debtors proposed to reorganize using Steven Brown’s income from his businesses. In re Brown, 498 B.R. at 489 . … Jimenez v. Quarterman, 555 U.S. 113, 118 , 129 S.Ct. 681 , 172 L.Ed.2d 475 (2009). If the language is clear and unambiguous, the inquiry is complete. Lamie v. U.S.

Jones v. Progressive Universal Insurance Company

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · Feb 28, 2024

See United States v. Sanford-Brown, Ltd., 788 F.3d 696, 713 (7th Cir. 2015) (vacated on other grounds, United States ex rel. Nelson v. Sanford-Brown, Ltd., 136 S. Ct. 2506 (2016)). … Baxter Intern., Inc. v. Abbott Labs., 297 F.3d 544 (7th Cir. 2002).

LaPree v. Prudential Financial

385 F. Supp. 2d 839 · District Court, S.D. Iowa · Aug 17, 2005

Brown, 41 F.3d 387, 389 (8th Cir.1994) (quoting St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co., 303 U.S. 283, 289 , 58 S.Ct. 586 , 82 L.Ed. 845 (1938)). … Citing Larkin v. Brown, Prudential asserts that the Eighth Circuit found the burden is satisfied in cases where defendant’s removal is based on the plaintiffs answers to interrogatories. Larkin v.

McCullough v. Brown (In Re Brown)

162 B.R. 506 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Dec 30, 1993

Jack McCullough (“Trustee”) has appealed Bankruptcy Judge Eugene Wedoff s confirmation (as set out in the “Opinion,” 152 B.R. 232 (Bankr.N.D.Ill.1993 1 )) of the bankruptcy plans of a group of Chapter 13 debtors: Willie Brown … Case To Student To Other Loan Creditors Creditors Decision Groves v.