Case law

Cauchi v. Brown

51 F. Supp. 2d 1014 · District Court, E.D. California · Jan 21, 1999

See, e.g., Land v. … Brown’s status. Plaintiff also contends that M.

United States v. Brown

417 F. Supp. 340 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 21, 1976

In Sanders v. … Lindsey v.

Brown v. Walker

293 F. Supp. 2d 1184 · District Court, D. Nevada · Nov 24, 2003

Brown must meet federal court procedural requirements; however, this Court interprets Brown’s pro se filings leniently. Ford v. Hubbard, 330 F.3d 1086, 1098 (9th Cir.2003). … Cruz v. Warden of Dwight Corr. Ctr., 907 F.2d 665, 667-69 (7th Cir.1990). Brown’s Petition contains eighteen Grounds.

United States v. Brown

993 F. Supp. 1338 · District Court, D. Kansas · Dec 10, 1997

The court finds that Brown lacks standing to raise this issue. It is well established that fourth amendment rights are personal rights which may not be asserted vicariously. See J.B. v. … However, Brown cannot complain if Haywood’s fourth amendment right to be free from unreasonable seizure was violated. Only Arnold Haywood can object to his own seizure. 1 See United States v.

Brown v. Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

38 F. Supp. 3d 1312 · District Court, S.D. Alabama · Aug 5, 2014

See Tapscott v. … Cooper v. International Paper Co., 912 F.Supp.2d 1307, 1313 (S.D.Ala.2012). .Indeed, the relationship between the CSA and statedaw negligence claims like Brown’s is far from obvious. See, e.g., Little v.

United States v. Brown

763 F. Supp. 1518 · District Court, D. Arizona · May 6, 1991

See Cohen v. … See also, United States v.

Brown v. NHSP Warden

2010 DNH 163 · District Court, D. New Hampshire · Sep 10, 2010

Brown v . … See Early v .

Brown v. District of Columbia

179 F. Supp. 3d 15 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 13, 2016

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ______________________________________ ) ANTONIO BROWN, ) … Four v.

Brown v. Cummins Distilleries Corporation

53 F. Supp. 659 · District Court, W.D. Kentucky · Jan 22, 1944

Rottenberg v. United States, 1 Cir., 137 F.2d 850 ; Henderson v. Burd, 2 Cir., 133 F.2d 515 , 146 A.L.R. 714 ; Taylor v. Brown, Em.App., 137 F.2d 654 ; Henderson v. Kimmel, D.C., 47 F.Supp. 635 ; Dieffenbaugh v. … In addition, the defendants’ contention has been rejected by Circuit Courts of Appeals in the following cases: Brown, Adm’r, v. Hecht Co., App. D.C., 137 F.2d 689, 691 ; Bowles, Adm’r, v.

United States v. Brown

99 F. Supp. 527 · District Court, D. Alaska · Aug 22, 1951

Mattox v. United States, 146 U.S. 140 , 13 S.Ct. 50 , 36 L.Ed. 917 ; Hyde v. United States, 225 U.S. 347, 383 , 32 S.Ct. 793 , 56 L.Ed. 1114 ; McDonald v. … Pless, 238 U.S. 264, 267, 269 . 35 S.Ct. 783 , 59 L.Ed. 1300 ; Wheaton v. United States, 8 Cir., 133 F.2d 522 .

Boyle v. Brown University

881 F. Supp. 747 · District Court, D. Rhode Island · Apr 5, 1995

McGregor v. Louisiana State Univ. Board of Supervisors, 3 F.3d 850, 866 (5th Cir.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1103 , 127 L.Ed.2d 415 (1994). … Louisiana State, 3 F.3d at 867 (quoting Berry v. Board of Supervisors of L.S.U., 716 F.2d 971, 979 (6th Cir.1983)).

Cohen v. Brown University

2003 DNH 112 · District Court, D. New Hampshire · Jun 27, 2003

v. Civil N o . 99-485-B Opinion N o . 2003 DNH 112 Brown University, et a l . … See Cohen v . Brown Univ., N.H. Civ. Action N o . 99-485-B (Doc. N o . 2 3 ) , R.I. Civil Action N o . 92-197 (D.R.I. April 2 , 2003) (Doc. No. 344).

United States v. Brown

2010 DNH 065P · District Court, D. New Hampshire · Apr 9, 2010

United States v . … In Cooper v .

United States v. Brown

715 F. Supp. 66 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 16, 1988

DISCUSSION Relying on Bifulco v. … United States v. Grammatikos, 633 F.2d 1013, 1025 (2d Cir. 1980); 1 see United States v. Alvarez-Porras, 643 F.2d 54 , 56 n. 1 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom. Garcia-Perez v.

Brown v. County of Nassau

736 F. Supp. 2d 602 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 3, 2010

Brown (“plaintiff’ or “Brown”) brings this action against defendant Nassau County (“defendant” or “the County”) alleging violations of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12131 et seq. … The County argues that Brown has failed to meet that standard on the issue of program accessibility.

Brown v. The Independence

4 F. Cas. 399 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 25, 1836

This is to prove another certificate of the time of Brown’s discharge from the hospital; the proceedings of a police court, the sentence of that court, the nature of the wound inflicted on Brown, and the hospital expenses … In the case of Hart v. The Little John [Case No. 6,153], the ship had delivered her cargo at Liverpool.

Brown v. The Neptune

4 F. Cas. 413 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 2, 1829

Part of the time he was in prison, put there by the captain, probably because he would not come on board; but this is not distinctly known. Our information upon these points is very imperfect and unsatisfactory. … This is not chargeable to Brown. Again, he left the brig on Friday, but the pilot did not come on board before Sunday; and, as the captain was not acquainted with the river, he could not have sailed without his pilot.

Brown v. Consolidated Freightway

152 F.R.D. 656 · District Court, N.D. Georgia · Mar 29, 1993

In Peppers v. … See, Moon v.

United States v. Brown

101 F. Supp. 939 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 29, 1951

Gonzales v. Brown

768 F. Supp. 581 · District Court, S.D. Texas · May 23, 1991

Plaintiffs, eight students at Virgil Gris-som Elementary School and their parents, filed suit against Faye Brown, a teacher at Grissom; the Houston Independent School District (“HISD”); members of the school board; and HISD … Bennett v. City of Slidell, 728 F.2d 762 (5th Cir.1984).