Case law

Credle-Brown v. Connecticut

502 F. Supp. 2d 292 · District Court, D. Connecticut · Aug 20, 2007

Kimel v. Florida Board of Regents, 528 U.S. 62, 73 , 120 S.Ct. 631 , 145 L.Ed.2d 522 (2000). 1. … Appleton v. Board of Education of Town of Stonington, 254 Conn. 205, 210 , 757 A.2d 1059 (2000).

Brown v. ASD Computing Center

519 F. Supp. 1096 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jul 15, 1981

In Potter v. … In United States v.

Brown v. K-MAC Enterprises

897 F. Supp. 2d 1098 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Sep 19, 2012

Schepp v. … See id.; Woods v.

Brown v. Adidas Int.

938 F. Supp. 628 · District Court, S.D. California · Apr 15, 1996

Forro Precision, Inc. v. Int’l Bus. Machines, 673 F.2d 1045, 1056-57 (9th Cir.1982). Brown’s complaint fails to set forth sufficiently a claim of trade secret infringement. … See Moore v.

Burroughs v. Petrone

138 F. Supp. 3d 182 · District Court, N.D. New York · Oct 15, 2015

Sheehy v. Brown, 335 Fed.Appx. 102, 104 (2d Cir.2009). IV. … .”); Brown v.

United States v. Brown

458 F. Supp. 49 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 11, 1978

Brown has indeed violated his probation. I note at the outset that the revocation of probation is a matter which rests squarely within the discretion of the district court. Burns v. … Brown relies heavily on United States v. Marion, 404 U.S. 307 , 92 S.Ct. 455 , 30 L.Ed.2d 468 (1971).

Brown v. United States

230 F. Supp. 774 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 12, 1964

At the trial the plaintiffs, Harold Brown, an attorney, and Virginia Brown, his wife, both testified to the fact that’ a “sonic boom” occurred on November' 3, 1959 at a time when he was at his law office in downtown Boston … Dalehite v. United States, 346 U.S. 15, 44-45 , 73 S.Ct. 956 , 97 L.Ed. 1427 (1953); O’Regan v.

Hendrick v. Brown & Root, Inc.

50 F. Supp. 2d 527 · District Court, E.D. Virginia · Jun 3, 1999

Gateway Coal Co. v. United Mine Workers of America, 414 U.S. 368, 374 , 94 S.Ct. 629 , 38 L.Ed.2d 583 (1974); Brown v. … Allied-Bruce Tenninix Co., Inc. v.

Burroughs Corp. v. Brown

501 F. Supp. 375 · District Court, E.D. Virginia · Jan 3, 1980

Brown, which was then awaiting decision. On April 18, 1979, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281 , 99 S.Ct. 1705 , 60 L.Ed.2d 208 . … Brown, 441 U.S. at 298 -301 n.29, 99 S.Ct. at 1716 , 60 L.Ed.2d at 223 -24 n.29 and materials cited therein; General Dynamics Corp. v.

McLaurin v. Prestage Foods, Inc.

271 F.R.D. 465 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Nov 10, 2010

Co. v. Brown, 511 U.S. 117, 121 , 114 S.Ct. 1359 , 128 L.Ed.2d 33 (1994); 7AA Charles A. Wright, Arthur R. Miller & Mary Kay Kane, Federal Practice and Procedure: Civil § 1784.1 (3d ed. 2005). … Co. v. Brown, 511 U.S. 117, 121 , 114 S.Ct. 1359 , 128 L.Ed.2d 33 (1994); 7AA Charles A. Wright, Arthur R. Miller & Maiy Kay Kane, Federal Practice and Procedure: Civil § 1784.1 (3d ed. 2005).

Brown v. District of Columbia

322 F.R.D. 51 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 13, 2017

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IVY BROWN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. … See Day v. District of Columbia, 894 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2012); Thorpe v. District of Columbia, 916 F. Supp. 2d 65 (D.D.C. 2013) (“Thorpe I”); Thorpe v.

Foraste v. Brown University

290 F. Supp. 2d 234 · District Court, D. Rhode Island · Oct 30, 2003

See Foraste v. Brown University, 248 F.Supp.2d 71 (D.R.I.2003) (“Forasté I ”). Presently before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment with respect to Count II of Plaintiffs Amended Complaint. … His photographs were used in Brown publications and by various Brown departments to convey a positive image of Brown to the public.

United States v. Brown

985 F. Supp. 722 · District Court, E.D. Michigan · Nov 25, 1997

Brown for arraiynment.” … Marshal was called to retrieve Brown. (See Def. Ex. 1, 2).

Brown v. Exactech, Inc.

376 F. Supp. 3d 811 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Mar 26, 2019

D.S. v. Grainger Cty. , 819 F.3d 834 , 847 (6th Cir. 2016). … Id. ; see also Albertson v. T.J.

Brown v. Berryhill

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 18, 2019

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NORA BROWN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Case No. 18-589 (RJL) ) NANCY A. … The ALJ’s opinion must show that he “has analyzed all evidence and has sufficiently explained the weight he has given to obviously probative exhibits,” id., including evidence that was rejected, Brown v.

Brown v. Hutton Group

775 F. Supp. 692 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 18, 1991

Beam Distilling Co. v. … Inc., 698 F.Supp. 1078, 1087 (S.D.N.Y.1988); Roebuck v. Guttman, 678 F.Supp. 68, 69 (S.D.N.Y.1988). Conclusion For the reasons stated, the action is dismissed without prejudice. SO ORDERED. 1 . See Brown v. E.F.

United States v. Brown

128 F. Supp. 2d 1034 · District Court, E.D. Michigan · Jan 16, 2000

Brown, 90 F.Supp.2d 841 (E.D.Mich.2000), Defendant Brian Brown is named in Count One of the First Superseding Indictment in this case, and is charged along with several co-defendants with conspiracy to distribute cocaine … Ford, 841 F.2d at 685 ; see also United States v.

Brown v. Barnhart

377 F. Supp. 2d 712 · District Court, S.D. Iowa · Jul 18, 2005

Wilcutts v. Apfel, 143 F.3d 1134, 1136-37 (8th Cir.1998) citing Brinker v. Weinberger, 522 F.2d 13, 16 (8th Cir.1975). See also Patrick v. Barnhart, 323 F.3d 592, 595 (8th Cir.2003). … Likewise, in Butts v.

Brown v. United States

248 F. Supp. 146 · District Court, D. Minnesota · Nov 24, 1965

Since Brown has already served five years, further delay for a hearing would be unjust. It is the conclusion of the Court that Brown ought to be released immediately. … Freeman v. United States, 9 Cir., 350 F.2d 940 ; King v. United States, 10 Cir., 346 F.2d 159 ; Chapin v. United States, 10 Cir., 341 F.2d 900 ; Pilkington v. United States, 4 Cir., 315 F.2d 204 ; Young Hee Choy v.

United States v. Brown

503 F. Supp. 2d 239 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 24, 2007

See United States v. … In United States v.