Case law

Brown v. McNeil

591 F. Supp. 2d 1245 · District Court, M.D. Florida · May 14, 2008

Inmate Brown: No sir. Mr. … Brown v. Florida Parole Comm’n, 886 So.2d 229 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004); Ex. Q.

United States v. Brown

17 F.R.D. 286 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 24, 1955

Brown, the defendant, for the years 1947 and 1948.” … Gordon v. United States, 344 U.S. 414 , 73 S.Ct. 369 , 97 L.Ed. 447 . The principal case cited by counsel for the defendant can easily be distinguished from the case at bar. In Fryer v.

Brown v. United States

179 F.R.D. 101 · District Court, W.D. New York · Apr 20, 1998

Brown claims loss of consortium. Defendant answered on October 26,1995. … Chaveriat v.

Allen v. Brown

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 24, 2020

See Allen v. Brown, 320 F. Supp. 3d 16 (D.D.C. 2018). … (Nebeker Decl., Allen v. Brown, No. 15-cv- 0969 (D.D.C.

Brown v. Wmata

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 18, 2020

MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff David Brown initiated this lawsuit in D.C. … Brown is a commercial requester”).

Brown v. United States

514 F. Supp. 2d 146 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 26, 2007

Brown a duty of care is a question of law for the court. See Jupin v. Kask, 447 Mass. 141, 146 , 849 N.E.2d 829 (2006). … Brown’s claims under the doctrine of Feres v. United States, 340 U.S. 135 , 71 S.Ct. 153 , 95 L.Ed. *149 152 (1950). See Brown v. United States, 410 F.Supp.2d 3 (D.Mass.2006). 2 .

United States v. Brown

531 F. Supp. 37 · District Court, D. Montana · Dec 7, 1981

In Miranda v. … United States v. Kennedy, 573 F.2d 657, 660 (9th Cir. 1978); United States v. Bekowies, 432 F.2d 8, 12 (9th Cir. 1975). 6 . See Oregon v. Mathiason, 429 U.S. 492 , 97 S.Ct. 711 , 50 L.Ed.2d 714 (1977). 7 .

United States v. Brown

95 F. Supp. 2d 277 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 27, 2000

See United States v. Evans, 49 F.3d 109, 114-15 (3d Cir.1995); United States v. Lieberman, 971 F.2d 989, 996 (3d Cir.1992). … The Board has postponed imposition of penalty pending sentencing in this case.

United States v. Brown

90 F. Supp. 2d 841 · District Court, E.D. Michigan · Mar 14, 2000

See United States v. Brown, 985 F.Supp. 722 (E.D.Mich.1997), aff'd, 169 F.3d 344 (6th Cir.1999). … See Doggett v.

United States v. Brown

36 F.R.D. 204 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 9, 1964

Village of Buhl v. Borgen, 231 Minn. 317 , 43 N.W.2d 95 . … This conclusion has been reached in a number of cases, among them a decision of the Fourth Circuit in Breese v. United States, 203 F. 824 .

Brown v. Vance-Cooks

920 F. Supp. 2d 61 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 1, 2013

See Dale v. … Price v. Greenspan, 374 F. Supp. 2d 177, 186 (D.D.C. 2005). Brown has only “offered the type of self-serving allegations that are simply insufficient to establish pretext.” Deloatch v. Harris Teeter, Inc., 797 F.

United States v. Brown

344 F. Supp. 291 · District Court, E.D. Virginia · Jun 8, 1972

Brown, Jr.,” on the lines opposite the words “to the order of” and “sender’s name,” and his correct address on the line opposite the word “address,” with respect to three of the money orders. … We are inclined to agree with United States v. Bedgood, 453 F.2d 988 (5 Cir., 1972); Gearing v.

Brown v. Slenker

47 F. Supp. 2d 754 · District Court, M.D. Louisiana · Feb 1, 1999

BROWN, THE COMMISSIONER, AND AGAINST THE DEFENDANTS, AS A MATTER OF LAW. … Ripper v. Bain, 253 Va. 197 , 482 S.E.2d 832 (Va.1997).

United States v. Brown

891 F. Supp. 1501 · District Court, D. Kansas · Jun 1, 1995

In Head v. … In United States v.

Brown v. Burmania

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 21, 2022

See Sosa v. Alvarez–Machain, 542 U.S. 692, 734 (2004) (“[T]he Declaration does not of its own force impose obligations as a matter of international law.”); Vizi v. Outback Steakhouse, 672 F. … June 2, 2022) (recognizing Third Circuit’s ruling in United States v. Chatman, 351 F.

Tindal v. McHugh

945 F. Supp. 2d 111 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 23, 2013

IMS, P.C. v. Alvarez, 129 F.3d 618, 623 (D.C. Cir. 1997); accord Camp v. … Marcum v. Salazar, 751 F. Supp. 2d 74, 78 (D.D.C. 2010); accord City of Dania Beach v. FAA, 628 F.3d 581, 590 (D.C.

United States v. Brown

384 F. Supp. 1151 · District Court, E.D. Michigan · Nov 5, 1974

In Fowler v. … Standard Oil of California v.

Brown v. Williams

484 F. Supp. 2d 271 · District Court, D. Delaware · Apr 25, 2007

INTRODUCTION On April 24, 2003, Albert James Brown, a pro se plaintiff proceeding informa pau-peris (“plaintiff’), filed the present action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 1 against Dave Williams, Courtney Porstman, and Warden … Rode v. Dellarci- *274 prete, 845 F.2d 1195, 1207 (3d Cir.1988) (citing Parratt v. Taylor, 451 U.S. 527, 537 n. 3, 101 S.Ct. 1908 , 68 L.Ed.2d 420 (1981); Hampton v.

Brown v. United States

374 F. Supp. 723 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Apr 18, 1974

Brown v. United States, E.D.Ark., 1972, 342 F.Supp. 987 . … Logue v. United States, 5 Cir., 1972, 459 F.2d 408 . A motion for rehearing en banc was denied with three judges dissenting; their views were expressed in a dissenting opinion written by Chief Judge Brown. Logue v.

United States v. Brown

862 F. Supp. 2d 1276 · District Court, N.D. Alabama · May 29, 2012

In Yick Wo v. … U.S. v.