Case law

City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corporation

356 F. Supp. 1380 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 27, 1972

Saylor v. Lindsley, 456 F.2d 896, 904 (2d Cir. 1972). In Protective Committee v. … In Florida Trailer & Equipment Co. v.

Brown v. Medtronic, Inc.

619 F. Supp. 2d 646 · District Court, D. Minnesota · May 26, 2009

INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Mark Brown, a former employee of Medtronic, Incorporated (“Medtron *648 ic”), alleges that the company, along with certain committees, boards, executives, and committee members (hereinafter referred … Plaintiff further asserts that the Defendants on Medtronic’s Board of Directors also breached their fiduciary duties by failing to properly appoint, monitor, and inform the Qualified Plan Committee (Claim V).

Brown v. De Fillipis

717 F. Supp. 172 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 7, 1989

Migra v. Warren City School District Board of Board, 465 U.S. 75, 81 , 104 S.Ct. 892, 896 , 79 L.Ed.2d 56 (1984). See 28 U.S.C. § 1738 . Accord, Kremer v. … Under the doctrine of Stone v.

Brown v. Kijakazi

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 1, 2022

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BEAUFORT BEE BROWN, Plaintiff, v. … Smith v. Bowen, 826 F.2d 1120, 1121 (D.C. Cir. 1987) (citing Brown v. Bowen, 794 F.2d 703, 705 (D.C. Cir. 1986)).

Brown v. Fisher

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 15, 2020

Brown v. Kiser, No. 3:19-CV-282 (E.D. Va. May 10, 2019) (denying in forma pauperis application under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g)), appeal dismissed, No. 19-6758 (4th Cir. July 19, 2019); see Brown v. … Aug. 14, 2018) (dismissing complaint with prejudice as frivolous and malicious); Brown v. Scott, No. 3:18-CV-385 (E.D. Va.

United States v. Brown

6 F. Supp. 331 · District Court, W.D. Kentucky · Dec 16, 1933

The indictment alleges that Brown and Jones at various times violated the 10 per cent, loan limit provisions of title 12 USCA § 84, Rev. … Stephens v. Overstolz (C. C.) 43 F. 465 ; Bowerman v. Hamner, 350 U. S. 504 , 39 S. Ct. 549 , 63 L. Ed. 1113 .

Brown v. United States

298 F. 177 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jul 1, 1920

S. v. One Sorrel Horse, Fed. Cas. No. 15,953, 27 Fed. Cas. 315 ; Jewell v. Board of Trustees, 113 Iowa, 47 , 84 N. W. 973, 975 . … First Trust & Savings Bank v. Smietanka (C. C. A.) 268 Fed. 230 . The demurrer is overruled.

Brown v. Mars, Inc.

49 F. Supp. 533 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Feb 26, 1943

Scott-Brown v. Cohen

220 F. Supp. 2d 504 · District Court, D. Maryland · Sep 2, 2002

See Scott-Brown v. Cohen, Civ. No. AW-00-3570, slip op. at 1-5 (D.Md. Aug. 14, 2001). … See Scott-Brown v. Cohen, Civ. No. AW-00-3570 (D.Md. Aug. 14, 2001) (order).

Curry v. Brown

970 F. Supp. 2d 667 · District Court, E.D. Kentucky · Sep 9, 2013

See Brown Depo. at 4. Citing to Daugherty v. Sajar Plastics, Inc., 544 F.3d 696 (6th Cir.2008) and Hunter v. … Mary’s Honor Ctr. v.

Ponton v. Newport News School Board

632 F. Supp. 1056 · District Court, E.D. Virginia · Mar 19, 1986

Plaintiff, Pamela Brown Ponton, a teacher in the Newport News Public School System, has filed this action against the Newport News School Board and various employees of the Newport News Public School System. … See, e.g., Board of Education v. Pico, supra; Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, supra; West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624 , 63 S.Ct. 1178 , 87 L.Ed. 1628 (1943).

Brown v. Mountainview Cutters, LLC

222 F. Supp. 3d 504 · District Court, W.D. Virginia · Nov 28, 2016

On December 2, 2012, Brown complained about the perceived discrimination by writing “EEOC” and other words upon a company white board visible to supervisors and other employees. … Hensley v.

Brown v. Principi

326 F. Supp. 2d 1193 · District Court, D. Kansas · Aug 16, 2004

Plaintiff Robert Brown was employed as a temporary file clerk in the records department at the Veterans Administration Medical Center at Leavenworth, Kansas. … See Wells v.

State Bank of Slater v. Brown (In re Brown)

121 B.R. 583 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Dec 4, 1990

Initially the blank provided for the names of the borrower was filled in with the words “Brown Bros., Wayne F. Brown, Rose M. Brown, Gerald E. Brown and Judy L. Brown”. … The signature block was typed as follows: *585 t/Brown Bros. (Debtor’s Name) By: s/Wayne F. Brown Title: t/Wayne F. Brown By: s/Rose M. Brown Title: t/Rose M. Brown s/Gerald E. Brown t/Gerald E. Brown s/Judy L.

Brown v. Massanari

231 F. Supp. 2d 1011 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jul 26, 2001

Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389, 401 , 91 S.Ct. 1420 , 28 L.Ed.2d 842 (1971). It does not necessarily mean a preponderance. Smolen v. Chater, 80 F.3d 1273, 1279 (9th Cir.1996) (citing Sor-enson v. … (Tr. 56). *1017 See Fair v.

Credle-Brown v. Connecticut

246 F.R.D. 408 · District Court, D. Connecticut · Oct 29, 2007

Co. of Pittsburgh v. Stroh Cos., Inc., 265 F.3d 97, 115 (2d Cir.2001) (noting that arguments raised for the first time on a motion for reconsideration may be rejected as untimely). … Gilmore v. Shearson/American Express, Inc., 811 F.2d 108, 112 (2d Cir.1987). Defendants’ untimely assertion of insufficiency of service does not override their waiver of personal jurisdiction.

Emrit v. Combs

District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Jun 9, 2025

Corp. v. Smith, 802 F. App’x 938, 945 (6th Cir. 2020) (citing Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007)). But this “lenient treatment . . . has limits.” Pilgrim v. … (citing Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989))). Pro se plaintiffs must still plead enough “factual matter, accepted as true, to ‘state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.’” Barnett v.

United States v. Brown

17 F.R.D. 286 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 24, 1955

Brown, the defendant, for the years 1947 and 1948.” … Gordon v. United States, 344 U.S. 414 , 73 S.Ct. 369 , 97 L.Ed. 447 . The principal case cited by counsel for the defendant can easily be distinguished from the case at bar. In Fryer v.

Brown v. First Insurance

295 F. Supp. 164 · District Court, D. Oregon · Dec 18, 1968

Co. v. Doiron, 170 F.2d 206 (1st Cir. 1948). It is not enough that Mrs. Brown and Mrs. … Brown v. Chapman, supra.

Brown v. Wmata

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 18, 2020

MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff David Brown initiated this lawsuit in D.C. … Brown is a commercial requester”).