Case law

United States v. Brown

431 F. Supp. 56 · District Court, D. Minnesota · Nov 4, 1976

The State of Minnesota, with whom Carl Brown concurs, disagrees. … See also, McKelvey v. United States, 260 U.S. 353 , 43 S.Ct. 132 , 67 L.Ed. 301 (1922); United States v. Alford, 274 U.S. 264 , 47 S.Ct. 597 , 71 L.Ed. 1040 (1927); Hunt v.

Brown v. United States

496 F. Supp. 903 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 12, 1980

In 1978, Brown was notified by I.R.S. of its claim under the 1961 deed. … It has been said that to refer to the statute as merely one “to quiet title” is misleading, Brown v. Berry, 89 N.J.Eq. 230, 108 A. 51 (E & A, 1918).

Brown v. United States

District Court, District of Columbia · May 2, 2016

Code § 23-110, United States v. Brown, Nos. F-2112-80 & F-1168-82 (D.C. Super. Ct. Apr. 3, 2006)) at 2. … See Pet., Ex. 1 (Judgment, Brown v. United States, Nos. 09-CO-1217 & 09-CO-1218 (D.C. Ct. App. June 28, 2010)).

Brown v. Kinross Gold, U.S.A.

378 F. Supp. 2d 1280 · District Court, D. Nevada · May 27, 2005

Brown (“Brown”), Glenbrook Capital LP (“Glen-brook”), and Peter Tsurekidis (“Tsureki-dis”). However, Defendants assert that the basis for this Court’s decision should be corrected as to Plaintiffs George P. … Epstein v. MCA, Inc., 50 F.3d 644, 656 (9th Cir.1995).

Brown v. United States

600 F. Supp. 47 · District Court, W.D. Kentucky · Oct 18, 1984

The tax court has addressed this argument in Davis v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 74 T.C. 881 (1980). In that case the court faced a set of facts somewhat similar to these. … Fulman v. United States, 434 U.S. 528 , 98 S.Ct. 841 , 55 L.Ed.2d 1 (1978). We find that this regulation is reasonable and consistant, and decline to hold it invalid.

United States v. Brown

338 F. Supp. 2d 552 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 17, 2004

On October 17, 2003, following a jury trial, Defendant Franklin Brown was *555 found guilty on ten counts of a thirty-seven count indictment. … See United States v. Bakhit, 218 F.Supp.2d 1232 (C.D.Cal.2002); United States v. Grabske, 260 F.Supp.2d 866 (N.D.Cal.2002); see also United States v. Snyder, 291 F.3d 1291 (11th Cir.2002).

Ruben

District Court, D. Maryland · Apr 28, 2026

See Katyle v. Penn Nat. … Wilson v. Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 525 F.3d 370, 376 (4th Cir. 2008) (internal quotation marks omitted)). A proposed amendment is futile when it “is clearly insufficient or frivolous on its face.”

McCormick & Co. v. Brown

58 F.2d 994 · District Court, S.D. West Virginia · Oct 21, 1931

Brown, State Commissioner of Prohibition of the State of West Virginia, and Howard B. Lee, Attorney General of that state. … Co. v. Mayor, etc., of Ensley (C. C.) 116 F. 756 ; City of Hutchinson v. Beckham (C. C. A.) 118 F. 399 ; Board of Trade v. Cella Commission Co. (C. C. A.) 145 F. 28 ; Jewel Tea Co. v. Lee’s Summit (D.

Odneal v. Schnell

District Court, D. Minnesota · Jul 15, 2024

Council of Tribes v. … (quoting Brown v. Plata, 563 U.S. 493, 531 (2011))).

Brown v. Boeing Co.

468 F. Supp. 2d 729 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 9, 2007

Finally, Brown must then prove that Boeing’s proffered reason is pretext for discrimination or retaliation. Pamintuan, 192 F.3d at 385-86 ; Johnson v. … Anderson v. Consol. Rail Corp., 297 F.3d 242 , 249 (3d Cir.2002); Simpson v. Kay Jewelers, 142 F.3d 639 , 644 n. 5 (3d Cir.1998). In reduction-in-force cases, the fourth element is relaxed, Torre v.

Brown v. Rinehart

575 F. Supp. 2d 620 · District Court, D. Delaware · Sep 12, 2008

Brown (“plaintiff’), an inmate at the Howard R. Young Correctional Institution (“HRYCI”), filed this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 . He proceeds pro se. … See DeHart v.

United States v. Brown

263 F. Supp. 777 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Dec 8, 1966

, the requirement of Rule 37(a) that written notice of appeal be filed within 10 days after entry of judgment was mandatory and jurisdictional, and the district court was without power to enlarge the time, United States v. … It is further ordered that Murray Bowman Brown, having filed notice of appeal within the extended time limit, is hereby authorized to appeal said proceeding without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefor.

United States v. Brown

546 F. Supp. 2d 312 · District Court, E.D. Virginia · Apr 24, 2008

Sanders v. United States, 373 U.S. 1, 19 , 83 S.Ct. 1068 , 10 L.Ed.2d 148 (1963); see Machibroda v. … He primarily relies on Burns v.

Allstate Insurance v. Brown

736 F. Supp. 705 · District Court, W.D. Virginia · Apr 24, 1990

As counsel for Brown admits, the Supreme Court of Virginia has upheld this type of provision as it applied in Virginia Farm Bureau v. Gibson, 236 Va. 433 , 374 S.E.2d 58 (1988). … Co. v.

Southeastern Bank v. Brown

266 B.R. 900 · District Court, S.D. Georgia · Jul 17, 2001

United States v. … (citation omitted); see also Bob Reves v.

United States v. Brown

744 F. Supp. 558 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 22, 1990

United States v. Roberts, 869 F.2d 70, 73 (2d Cir.1989). In the instant case, an arrest warrant for Brown was executed on February 13, 1990. … The Court reserves decision on defendant Brown’s motion to suppress potentially incriminating, non-pedigree statements allegedly obtained in violation of Miranda v. Arizona and Edwards v. Arizona.

Brown v. State Auto

189 F. Supp. 2d 665 · District Court, W.D. Kentucky · Sep 19, 2001

May 27, 1998: Brown brings action for damages against Bell in Taylor Circuit Court. June 18, 1998: Brown forwards State Auto a copy of her complaint in Brown v. … She notes that she does not plan to bring State Auto in as a party in Brown v. Bell, but “wanted to let you know what is happening so State Auto may take whatever action it deems appropriate concerning [the] UIM claim.”

Brown v. Hyatt Corp.

128 F. Supp. 2d 697 · District Court, D. Hawaii · Dec 14, 2000

Brown and his wife, Isabel Brown, (collectively “Plaintiffs”) sued Hyatt Corporation, dba Hyatt Hotels Hawaii (“Defendant”), alleging negligence and loss of consortium. … v.

Brown v. United States

552 F. Supp. 662 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Nov 30, 1982

In opposing the summary judgment motion, Brown is entitled to all reasonable inferences in his favor from the facts of record, United States v. … Brady Co. v. Lem Products, Inc., 521 F.Supp. 676, 678 (N.D.Ill.1981).

Brown v. Colvin

970 F. Supp. 2d 559 · District Court, S.D. Mississippi · Aug 27, 2013

Greenspan v. … See McGehee v.