Case law

United States v. Brown

957 F. Supp. 696 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 18, 1997

Defendant Wilbert Brown pled guilty to one count of possession with the intent to distribute cocaine base crack, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1). … See also United States v.

Cohen v. Brown University

879 F. Supp. 185 · District Court, D. Rhode Island · Mar 29, 1995

Cohen v. *188 Brown Univ., 809 F.Supp. 978 (D.R.I.1992). … See, e.g., Homer v. Kentucky High Sch. Athletic Ass’n., 43 F.3d 265 (6th Cir.1994); Kelley v. Board of Trustees, 35 F.3d 265 (7th Cir.1994), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 938 , 130 L.Ed.2d 883 (1995); Favia v.

Brown v. Smith

56 F. Supp. 3d 910 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jul 16, 2014

See, e.g., Cooney v. … For similar reasons, Smith’s argument that the Seventh Circuit “has consistently applied absolute immunity to parole board members” is not persuasive. See Def.’s Br. at 8. In Wilson v.

Brown v. Villanova University

378 F. Supp. 342 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 31, 1974

Griffin v. Breckenridge, 403 U.S. 88 , 91 S.Ct. 1790 , 29 L.Ed.2d 338 (1971); Shapiro v. Thompson, 394 U.S. 618 , 89 S.Ct. 1322 , 22 L.Ed.2d 600 (1969); Cameron v. Brock, 473 F.2d 608 (6th Cir. 1973); Richardson v. … Miller, 446 F.2d 1247 (3rd Cir. 1971); Pendrell v. Chatham College, 370 F.Supp. 494 (W.D.Pa.1974); Bellamy v. Mason’s Stores, Inc., 368 F.Supp. 1025 (E.D.Va.1973). 4.

United States v. Brown

636 F. Supp. 2d 1116 · District Court, D. Nevada · Jul 2, 2009

He followed Officer Bates’ vehicle in pursuit of the fleeing suspect, Defendant Brown. … Reason to believe that Defendant Brown was the robber was, of course, greatly strengthened when he fled into the parking garage. See Illinois v.

Yang v. Brown University

149 F.R.D. 440 · District Court, D. Rhode Island · Jun 15, 1993

See Ocelot Oil Corp. v. … The-atre Corp. v.

Brown v. Yates

753 F. Supp. 2d 1069 · District Court, C.D. California · Nov 18, 2010

.’"); Stanley v. … [Pet.]: Alan Brown. [Morris]: Is that what you've been drinking, is a Miller Lite? [Pet.]: Miller Lite. [Morris]: Where at? [Pet.]: Bar. [Morris]: Bar, which bar?

Smith v. City of Madison

364 F. Supp. 3d 656 · District Court, S.D. Mississippi · Oct 23, 2018

Rather, the Mayor makes a recommendation that the Board of Alderman ("the Board") can either accept or reject. Thus, the Board is the final decisionmaker. See Miss. Code Ann. § 21-3-5 . … In general, "[w]ithout a showing that [the Board] had actual knowledge of the alleged improper basis of [the Mayor's termination] recommendation, [the Board] cannot be liable for the alleged retaliation."

Black v. Brown

355 F. Supp. 925 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 13, 1973

A written statement of the decision of a majority of the board, the basis for the decision, and the disciplinary action, if any, to be imposed is given to the inmate. … Sostre v. McGinnis, supra, Bundy v. Cannon, 328 F.Supp. 165 (D.Md., 1971); Landman v. Royster, 333 F.Supp. 621 (E.D.Va. 1971).

United States v. Brown

376 F. Supp. 451 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · May 13, 1974

The defendant Nathaniel Brown is charged in an information with attempting to board a commercial aircraft being operated by an air carrier in air transportation while having on or about his person a “concealed deadly or dangerous … On August 3, 1972, shortly before 5:00 p. m., defendant Nathaniel Brown presented himself at Gate 7-8 for the purpose of boarding Trans World Airlines Flight 270 for a flight from Kansas City, Missouri, to Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Salcedo v. Artuz

107 F. Supp. 2d 405 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 2, 2000

Moreover, the standard set forth in Williams abrogates the de novo review that was required under Brown v. … See Salcedo, 92 N.Y.2d at 1021-22 , 684 N.Y.S.2d 480 , 707 N.E.2d 435 ; Salcedo, 666 N.Y.S.2d at 174 (citing People v. Brown, 80 N.Y.2d 361 , 590 N.Y.S.2d 422 , 604 N.E.2d 1353 (1992)).

White v. Calvert

District Court, S.D. Texas · Dec 27, 2021

Cooper v. Brown, 844 F.3d 517, 522 (5th Cir. 2016). … Ashcroft v. al-Kidd, 563 U.S. 731, 735 (2011); see also Roque v. Harvel, 993 F.3d 325, 331 (5th Cir. 2021). “These steps may be considered in either order.” Shumpert v.

Willoughby v. Potomac Electric Power Co.

853 F. Supp. 174 · District Court, D. Maryland · May 25, 1994

Wellons v. Numerica Savings Bank, FSB, 749 F.Supp. 336 (D.Mass.1990); Stanley v. Numero Uno Franchise Corp., 741 F.Supp. 1237 (M.D.La.1990); Record Data International, Inc. v. … See Figures v. Board of Utilities, 967 F.2d 357 (10th Cir. 1992); see also Siddiqi v.

United States v. Brown

349 F. Supp. 420 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Sep 11, 1972

Bouschor v. United States, 316 F.2d 451 (8th Cir. 1963). Further, the document was not requested by Marshall Bratter but *427 was requested by Mr. Brown for inclusion in the files of Andersen. … However, in Colton v.

Brown v. United States

458 F. Supp. 182 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 16, 1978

Brown v. United States, No. 77-2148 (2d Cir. June 12, 1978) (remand order). Upon further briefing and consideration of the point, the Court substantially denies the petition. I. … Following Heflin v.

Brown v. Eurocopter S.A.

143 F. Supp. 2d 781 · District Court, S.D. Texas · May 31, 2001

See Brown v. Eurocopter, S.A., 38 F.Supp.2d 515, 518 (S.D.Tex.1999). Under maritime law, there is no cause of action under either a negligence or strict-liability theory for damage that a product causes to itself. … See Nicor Supply Ships Assocs. v.

Missouri Hospital Association v. Price

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Feb 9, 2018

Perez v. Mortg. Bankers Ass’n, 135 S. Ct. 1199, 1203 (2015) (Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 302-303 (1979)). However, “[n]ot all rules must be issued through the notice-and-comment process. … V. THE MHA IS ENTITLED TO SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON COUNT V RELATIVE TO THE FINAL RULE.

Great Lakes Higher Education Corp. v. Brown (In Re Brown)

99 Daily Journal DAR 10593 · District Court, S.D. California · Jul 29, 1999

It held that the Browns would suffer an undue hardship if they were forced to repay their student loans. See Brown v. Salliemae Servicing Corp. (In re Brown), 227 B.R. 540, 548 (Bankr.S.D.Cal.1998). … See Brown, 227 B.R. at 547 . It is clear that a B.A.P. ruling does not bind this Court. See Bank of Maui v.

United States v. Brown

4 F.2d 270 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Mar 2, 1925

Smelting Co. v. Kemp, 104 U. S. 636 , 26 L. Ed. 875 ; Leo v. Johnson, 116 U. S. 48 , 6 S. Ct. 249 , 29 L. Ed. 570 ; Howe v. Parker, 190 F. 738 , 111 C. C. A. 406 ; Dixon v. Cox (C. C. A.) 268 F. 285 . … The eases cited are Pettibone v. U. S., 148 U. S. 197 , 13 S. Ct. 542 , 37 L. Ed. 419 ; U. S. v. Rabinowich, 238 17. S. 78, 35 S. Ct. 682 , 59 L. Ed. 1211 ; and U. S. v. Stevenson, 215 U. S. 190 , 30 S. Ct. 35 , 54 L.

Brown v. City of Hous.

297 F. Supp. 3d 748 · District Court, S.D. Texas · Dec 26, 2017

Brown relies on Brandley v. … v.