Case law

Waker v. Brown

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 9, 2010

Brown v. District of Columbia, 514 F.3d 1279, 1285 (D.C. Cir. 2008) (quoting Haynesworth v. Miller, 820 F.2d 1245, 1262 (D.C. Cir. 1987)). … Brown’s Mot. to Dismiss at 7, n.2.

Lamphere v. Brown University

491 F. Supp. 232 · District Court, D. Rhode Island · Apr 22, 1980

In the absence of specific guidance from the consent decree, I will adopt the standard of proof common to discrimination cases. 2 See Sweeney v. Board of Trustees of Keene State College, 604 F.2d 106 (1st Cir. 1979). … As the First Circuit emphasized in Loeb v.

Alshrafi v. American Airlines, Inc.

321 F. Supp. 2d 150 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 8, 2004

Capital Props., Inc., 212 F.3d 20, 23 (1st Cir.2000) (quoting Franchise Tax Board, 463 U.S. at 13 , 103 S.Ct. 2841 ). See also Metheny v. Becker, 352 F.3d 458, 460-61 (1st Cir.2003). … See also Chukwu v. Board of Directors British Airways, 889 F.Supp. 12, 13 (D.Mass.1995), aff'd mem., 101 F.3d 106 , 1996 WL 662466 (1st Cir.1996) (same). Id.

United States v. Brown

40 F. 457 · District Court, E.D. South Carolina · Oct 11, 1889

S. v. Moyers, 15 Fed. Rep. 411, which has been quoted. One more point must be noticed. The indictment alleges that the pensioner, Nellie Deas, is the lawful widow of David Deas, a soldier, etc.

Brown v. United States

630 F. Supp. 57 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Oct 21, 1985

U.S. v. Boyle, 469 U.S. -, - n. 8, 105 S.Ct. 687 , 692 n. 8, 83 L.Ed.2d 622 , 630 n. 8 (1985). … In addition, the government contends that this case is controlled by United States v.

Brown v. Holder

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 22, 2011

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEMETREOUS BROWN, : : Plaintiff, … v.

Lamphere v. Brown University

613 F. Supp. 971 · District Court, D. Rhode Island · Jul 16, 1985

Reprinted, in Lamphere v. Brown University, 491 F.Supp. 232 , 238-62 app. (D.R.I.1980). … See Lamphere v. Brown University, 491 F.Supp. 232 (D.R.I.1980), aff'd, 685 F.2d 743 (1st Cir.1982).

Brown v. Hutton Group

795 F. Supp. 1317 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 10, 1992

See Brown v. E.F. Hutton Group, 735 F.Supp. 1196 (S.D.N.Y.1990). 3 . … See Brown v. Hutton Group, 775 F.Supp. 692, 695 (S.D.N.Y.1991). The Court applied Lampf retroactively pursuant to the Supreme Court’s decision in James B. Beam Distilling Co. v.

Thomas v. Brown

824 F. Supp. 160 · District Court, N.D. Indiana · May 19, 1993

Kroll v. Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois, 934 F.2d 904, 907 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 112 S.Ct. 377 [ 116 L.Ed.2d 329 ] (1991). … Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois, 934 F.2d 904 (7th Cir.1991); Cosby v. Jackson, 741 F.Supp. 740 (N.D.Ill.1990), and Rodenbeck v.

Brown v. United States

280 F. Supp. 854 · District Court, D. New Mexico · Nov 17, 1967

Brown and one Frank Hale. Under the terms of this agreement, Dr. Brown was to furnish all expense money, and Hale was to furnish labor and expertise. … Brown and upon the diary kept by Mr. Hale.

Long v. Brown

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 13, 2010

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1950 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).  Plaintiff, a resident of Ox on Hill, Maryland, sues an individual apparently associated with Target Department Store in District Heights, Maryland.

Lamb v. Brown

14 F. Cas. 988 · District Court, D. Indiana · Jul 1, 1875

Symonds v. Barnes [ 50 Me. 191 ]; Payne v. Able [7 Bush. 344]; In re Archenbraun [Case No. 504]. The jurisdiction of the bankruptcy court having once attached, it is complete for all purposes of the act.

Brown v. Mortgagestar, Inc.

194 F. Supp. 2d 473 · District Court, S.D. West Virginia · Apr 4, 2002

Defendants did not pay off the Browns’ outstanding loans as represented in the closing documents, but simply kept the money. On November 27, 2001 the Browns gave cancellation notice, but Defendants did not respond. … Mylan Laboratories, Inc. v. Matkari, 1 F.3d 1130, 1134 (4th Cir.1993) (citations omitted); see also Brooks v. City of Winston-Salem, 85 F.3d 178, 181 (4th Cir.1996); Gardner v. E.I.

Brown v. Ruane

645 F. Supp. 2d 41 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Aug 19, 2009

See Brown Mem. in Supp. at 11. According to Brown, Miles is an incorrect application of the Supreme Court’s legal standard as set forth in Delaware v. … Brown responds, relying as well on New Hampshire v.

Cohen v. Board of Education of East Ramapo Central School District

536 F. Supp. 486 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 31, 1982

Defendant cites Board of Regents v. Tomanio, 446 U.S. 478 , 100 S.Ct. 1790 , 64 L.Ed.2d 440 (1980), and Walker v. … Board of Regents v.

Brown v. Boulder Services, Inc. (In Re Brown)

68 B.R. 670 · District Court, D. Colorado · Dec 24, 1986

Co., Inc. v. Kirshner, 382 F.Supp. 338, 344 (W.D.Mo.1974).” III.STATEMENT OF FACTS The bankruptcy court found that the Browns purchased a going business concern from Boulder Services, Inc. … V. CONCLUSION The Browns make much of the fact that these security agreements and financing statements were not positioned correctly.

Brown Ex Rel. Brown v. Stone Manufacturing Co.

660 F. Supp. 454 · District Court, S.D. Mississippi · Nov 14, 1986

Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, supra. Also see Fontenot v. Upjohn Co., 780 F.2d 1190 (5th Cir.1986). A. … Defendant cites Simien v. S.S.

Foraste v. Brown University

248 F. Supp. 2d 71 · District Court, D. Rhode Island · Mar 7, 2003

public — “glimpses of the kind of place Brown is” — to be used in Brown publications and by various Brown departments. … Anderson v.

Boesen v. Brown

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 14, 2023

See Arsanjani v. … Heller v. District of Columbia, 952 F.

Brown v. Hutton Group

795 F. Supp. 1307 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 27, 1992

Brown, et al., pursuant to Section 476 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991, Pub.L. … See Brown v. Hutton Group, 775 F.Supp. 692, 695 (S.D.N.Y.1991). The Court applied Lampf retroactively pursuant to the Supreme Court’s decision in James B. Beam Distilling Co. v.