Case law

Brown v. Brown

343 F. Supp. 2d 195 · District Court, E.D. New York · Nov 5, 2004

See Fitzgerald v. … F.D.I.C. v. Becker, 166 F.R.D. 14, 15 (D.Md.1996) (citing Smoot v.

Brown v. Brown (In re Brown)

7 B.R. 268 · District Court, D. New York · Dec 3, 1980

, be and the same remain vested in the plaintiff, DEBORAH BROWN and that defendant will pay $40.00 per week for the support of said infant, and it is further. … Brown, to the First National Bank of Wayland fails both tests because first it is not payable to the wife and/or child of the debtor and secondly it is not in the nature of alimony.

Brown v. Brown

134 F.2d 505 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 21, 1942

Bussius v. Bussius, D.C.1941, 38 F.Supp. 871 . The entire procedure is a consent procedure. Cf. Mahoney v.

Brown v. Brown

18 V.I. 534 · District Court, Virgin Islands · Jul 13, 1981

Borden v. Antonelli Coll.

304 F. Supp. 3d 678 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 29, 2018

See Russ v. … Brown v. VHS of Mich., Inc. , 545 Fed.Appx. 368 , 372 (6th Cir. 2013). Here, Ms. Borden did not respond to Defendants' argument regarding promissory estoppel.

Wynes v. Kaiser Permanente Hospitals

936 F. Supp. 2d 1171 · District Court, E.D. California · Mar 28, 2013

Defendants rely on Brown v. City of Tucson, 336 F.3d 1181, 1190 (9th Cir.2003), in arguing that a hostile work environment claim is not actionable under the ADA. (ECF No. 71' at 15.) … See Earl v.

Stringfield v. Christopher Newport University

64 F. Supp. 2d 593 · District Court, E.D. Virginia · Sep 14, 1999

V. … Thurston v. Louisa County School Board, 1999 WL 195676 , *3 (W.D.Va.1999) (slip op.)

Nissin Foods (USA) Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

515 F. Supp. 1154 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 2, 1981

See Oburn v. Shapp, 521 F.2d 142 (Third Circuit 1975); nor will litigation expenses or substantial and unrecoupable costs justify the grant of such extraordinary relief. See Renegotiation Board v. … Citing Myers v. Bethlehem Corporation, 303 U.S. 41 , 58 S.Ct. 459 , 82 L.Ed. 638 , and Renegotiation Board v.

Drewrey v. Clinton

763 F. Supp. 2d 54 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 26, 2011

Brown v. Marsh, 777 F.2d 8, 13 (D.C.Cir.1985) (stating that “because untimely exhaustion of administrative remedies is an affirmative defense, the defendant bears the burden of pleading and proving it”). … Dist. v.

Brown-Thill v. Brown

929 F. Supp. 2d 887 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Mar 8, 2013

Inc. v. … Brown cites to Tick v.

Molinari v. Bloomberg

596 F. Supp. 2d 546 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jan 13, 2009

In Benzow v. … Whether the City Council and the Mayor Violated Conflicts Rules The advisory opinions of the Board “should be given considerable weight by the courts.” Di Lucia v.

United States v. King

4 F. Supp. 3d 114 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 9, 2013

United States v. Brown, 504 F.3d 99, 104 (D.C. Cir. 2007) (quoting District of Columbia v. Hunt, 163 F.2d 833, 837–38 (D.C. Cir. 1947)). Section 924(c) is such a statute. … Brown v. Cameron, 353 F.2d 835, 836 n.1 (D.C. Cir. 1965).

Brown & Brown, Inc. v. Cola

745 F. Supp. 2d 588 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 4, 2010

Brown & Brown and its subsidiaries, including Brown & Brown of Pennsylvania, Inc. (“Brown-PA”) based in Pennsylvania, and Grinspec, Inc. … Donsco, Inc. v.

Brown v. Brown

541 F. Supp. 688 · District Court, N.D. Indiana · Jun 22, 1982

Brown and Ursel Bartley “on behalf of” Lottie Brown. Lee W. … Tree Top v. Smith, 577 F.2d 519, 521 (9th Cir. 1978). In the present context, the issue revolves around the visitation and custody of Lottie Brown.

Thomas v. First Federal Sav. Bank of Indiana

653 F. Supp. 1330 · District Court, N.D. Indiana · Feb 6, 1987

As such, First Federal is subject to the constitution and laws of the United States and to all rules, regulations and orders issued by the Federal Home Loan Bank Board (“Bank Board”). … The remarks of the Federal Home Loan Bank Board regarding the Board’s regulations and policies in making loans, cited by the court in Laufman , are instructive on this point.

Dosso v. Barr

District Court, District of Columbia · May 22, 2020

(quoting Best v. Kelly, 39 F.3d 328, 330 (D.C. Cir. 1994))). … Brown v. GSA, 425 U.S. 820, 829 (1976); see also Kizas v. Webster, 707 F.2d 524, 542 (D.C. Cir. 1983) (“The Title VII remedy declared exclusive for federal employees in Brown v.

Armbruster Ex Rel. Armbruster v. Benefit Trust Life Insurance

687 F. Supp. 403 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jun 7, 1988

Co. v. Dedeaux, — U.S. —, 107 S.Ct. 1549 , 95 L.Ed.2d 39 (1987), and Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. … Brown v. Retirement Committee of Briggs & Stratton, 797 F.2d 521, 525-26 (7th Cir.1986), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 107 S.Ct. 1311 , 94 L.Ed.2d 165 (1987).

Brown v. Brown

3 Navajo Rptr. 239 · United States District Court · May 17, 1982

Not only Rosita Begay Brown, the defendant, but Tanya Sharon Brown, the child of the parties, has been relying upon the fixed child support amount all this time. It *240 would hardly be fair to let Mr. … Brown sit on his rights over the years and then permit him to now come in and cry that the March, 1977 order was unfair to him.

Brown v. Brown

97 F. Supp. 237 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 29, 1950

The attorneys who represented the plaintiff in her lifetime oppose said motion allegedly as her attorneys despite her death, and they have also filed a motion for. leave to intervene on behalf of Doris Brown Wesley who asserts

In Re Compact Disc Minimum Advertised Price Antitrust Litigation

456 F. Supp. 2d 131 · District Court, D. Maine · Oct 2, 2006

(quoting Weese v. … Servs., Inc. v.