Case law

Brown v. United States

365 F. Supp. 328 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 28, 1973

Brown enlisted in the United States Marine Corps on July 22, 1966, for a term of four years. … a board to do so.

Brown v. Taylor

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 1, 2011

DistrIct & B Courts for the District o;~~~~~ra SHIRON BROWN, Plaintiff, v … See United States v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683, 693 (1974) (acknowledging that the Executive Branch "has exclusive authority and absolute discretion to decide whether to prosecute a case"); Powell v.

Brown v. Hermann

551 F. Supp. 201 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 11, 1982

California First Bank v. Townsend, 124 Cal.App.3d 922, 930 , 177 Cal.Rptr. 723 (1981). And both parties in this action appear to agree that intent is the key to resolution of the present dispute.

Clark v. Kijakazi

District Court, D. Nevada · Aug 12, 2024

Diedrich v. … Lambert v. Saul, 980 F.3d 7 1266, 1277 (9th Cir. 2020) (emphasis original, quoting Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 494 (9th 8 Cir. 2015)).

Robinson v. Brown

987 F. Supp. 1470 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Nov 13, 1997

Byrd v. Clark, 783 F.2d 1002, 1006 (11th Cir.1986); Williams v. Kelley, 624 F.2d 695, 697 (5th Cir.1980). … See, Graham v. Connor, supra.; and Vineyard v. County of Murray, Georgia, 990 F.2d 1207 (11th Cir.1993); Cottrell v. Caldwell, 85 F.3d 1480 (11th Cir.1996); Brothers v..

United States v. Brown

188 F. Supp. 624 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 10, 1960

See United States v. Fassoulis, D.C.S.D.N.Y.1959, 179 F.Supp. 645 . Cf. United States v. Lustman, 2 Cir., 258 F.2d 475 , certiorari denied, 1958, 358 U.S. 880 , 79 S.Ct. 118 , 3 L.Ed.2d 109 . 7 . See United States v. … Von Moltke v. Gillies, 1948, 332 U.S. 708, 723-724 , 68 S.Ct. 316 , 92 L.Ed. 309 ; Glasser v. United States, 1942, 315 U.S. 60, 70 , 62 S.Ct. 457 , 86 L.Ed. 680 ; Johnson v. Zerbst, 1938, 304 U.S. 458, 464 , 58 S.

United States v. Brown

195 F. Supp. 3d 926 · District Court, E.D. Michigan · Jul 6, 2016

Introduction Deshawn Brown (“Defendant”) argues that under Johnson v. United States, 559 U.S. 133 , 130 S.Ct. 1265 , 176 L.Ed.2d 1 (2010) (“Johnson I”) and Johnson v. … Cf United States v.

Brown v. Hughes

483 F. Supp. 793 · District Court, D. Arizona · Feb 6, 1980

“Buck” Brown on the same charges as those upon which the jury was unable to agree in the first trial. … Petitioner Brown asserts that the trial judge prematurely and contrary to law determined that the jury was unable to reach a unanimous verdict and declared a mistrial, thereby depriving Brown of his constitutional right to

United States v. Bensalem Township

220 F. Supp. 3d 615 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 14, 2016

In support, the United States ’cites a Southern District of New York case addressing the same issue — whether a municipality’s zoning board must be joined in an RLUIPA enforcement action. See Bikur Cholim, Inc. v. … Said differently, because the municipality had the authority to enforce and amend the zoning laws, relief was possible under *620 RLUIPA without joining the local zoning board as a defendant. Id.; cf. Hovsons v.

Eschenasy v. New York City Department of Education

604 F. Supp. 2d 639 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 25, 2009

The Second Circuit has stated that parents “may not be subject to the same mainstreaming requirements as a school board.” M.S. ex rel S.S. v. Bd. of Educ. of Yonkers, 231 F.3d 96, 105 (2d Cir.2000). … It is well settled that “[t]he Board of Education of the City of New York is not a department of the city government, it is an independent corporate body and may sue and be sued in its corporate name.” Divisich v.

United States v. Brown

354 F. Supp. 1000 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 20, 1973

In Barker v. … I conclude Brown has not been denied his Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial. See United States v. Taylor, 469 F.2d 284 (3rd Cir. 1972); United States ex rel. Stukes v. Shovlin, 464 F.2d 1211 (3rd Cir. 1972). 1 .

Brown v. Baer

54 F. Supp. 887 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Sep 16, 1943

Brown, Administrator, Office of Price Administration, v. Julius Baer et al., an application has been filed to compel the respondents to attend, testify, and produce documentary evidence. … Securities and Exchange Commission, 299 U.S. 504 , 57 S.Ct. 18 , 81 L.Ed. 374 ; Woolley v. United States, 9 Cir., 97 F.2d 258, 259 ; Consolidated Mines of California et al. v.

United States v. Brown

715 F. Supp. 2d 688 · District Court, E.D. Virginia · May 25, 2010

Although the Government has not charged Brown with any drug offenses, it cites United States v. … See United States v.

Blank v. United States of America

District Court, N.D. Texas · Sep 3, 2021

v. … Brown v. Callahan, 623 F.3d 223, 253 (5th Cir. 2010).

Lamphere v. Brown University

71 F.R.D. 641 · District Court, D. Rhode Island · Jul 21, 1976

The courts utilizing the across the board approach have almost uniformly permitted the class to include both future 8 and past employees and applicants for employment. See, e. g., Wetzel v. … No circuit court opinions have affirmatively rejected the across the board approach, although several district courts have refused to adopt it. E. g., White v. Gates Rubber Co., 53 F.R.D. 412 (D.Colo.1971); Burney v.

Waker v. Brown

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 3, 2011

) DEVON BROWN et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________) … By Order of January 6, 2011, plaintiff, proceeding pro se, was advised consistent with Fox v. Strickland, 837 F.2d 507 (D.C.

Brown v. United States

121 F. Supp. 106 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 30, 1954

Compare Brown, 1951, 16 T.C. 623 , and Hogg, 1949, 13 T.C. 361 , in which the tax Court reached the same conclusion upon somewhat similar considerations. 2 . … For other cases noting that deductibility of items pursuant to Sections 22k and 23u should not depend upon state law see Grant v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 2 Cir., 1953, 209 F.2d 430 ; Laughlin’s Estate v.

United States v. Brown

74 F. Supp. 2d 648 · District Court, N.D. West Virginia · Oct 27, 1998

The defendants, Ricky Lee Brown, Barbara M. Brown, and Janette A. Abies, were present in the house and escaped from the fire unharmed. … Defendants rely upon Shapiro v. Thompson, 394 U.S. 618 , 89 S.Ct. 1322 , 22 L.Ed.2d 600 (1969), and Skinner v.

United States v. Brown

230 F. Supp. 3d 513 · District Court, M.D. Louisiana · Jan 31, 2017

Upon doing so, Deputies located a black male who was later identified as Henry Brown, hiding under the bed in the master bedroom, wrapped up in a blanket. He was secured by Deputies. … See Groh v.

Musonda v. Rogers

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Nov 6, 2023

Aragon v. Williams, 819 F. … (alteration omitted) (quoting Brown v. Barrow, 512 F.3d 1304, 1307 (11th Cir. 2008))). c.