Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersFD

10,000+ results

2.32s

  • Brown v. Vilsack

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 11, 2012

    B (Letter to plaintiff from Philip Miller, Paralegal Specialist, Office of the Clerk of the Board, U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board, dated June 30, 2010). … Pace v. DiGuglielmo, 544 U.S. 408, 418 (2005).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States v. Brown

    729 F. Supp. 1120 · District Court, E.D. Virginia · Dec 29, 1989

    . § 3553 , the Court sets forth the following findings and reasons in connection with the sentence imposed on STANFORD BROWN on December 29, 1989. A. … See United States v. Vickers, 891 F.2d 86 (5th Cir.1989); United States v. Medeiros, 884 F.2d 75 (3d Cir.1989); United States v. Goldbaum, 879 F.2d 811 (10th Cir.1989); United States v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • United States v. Brown

    404 F. Supp. 968 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 6, 1975

    Brown (Brown) and United States Telephone Company of imported merchandise under false and fraudulent invoices. 1 The defendants were previously convicted of a violation of Title 18, United States Code with respect to 36 entries … Certainly Brown knew who the manufacturer seller was but apparently did not choose to have that revealed.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • First Jersey National Bank v. Brown (In Re Brown)

    127 B.R. 108 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 11, 1991

    See Wamsganz v. Boatmen’s Bank of De Soto, 804 F.2d 503, 505 (8th Cir.1986); Little Creek, 779 F.2d at 1073 ; In re Winshall Settlor’s Trust, 758 F.2d 1136, 1137 (6th Cir.1985). … Id.; see also Wamsganz v. Boatmen’s Bank of De Soto, 804 F.2d 503, 505 (8th Cir.1986).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brown v. The Allianca

    63 F. 726 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 16, 1894

    Brown v. Gray, 70 Hun, 261 , 24 N. Y. Supp. 61 . … No. 7,196; Id., 9 Wall. 758 ; The Kalorama, 10 Wall. 204 ; The Patapsco, 13 Wall. 329 ; The Union Express, Brown, Adm. 538 , Fed. Cas. No. 14,364; Thomas v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Hurley-Bardige v. Brown

    900 F. Supp. 567 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Oct 5, 1995

    The Secretary — the defendant Jesse Brown, the Secretary of the Department of Veterans Affairs — now moves for summary judgment, arguing that the Act does not require employers to make reasonable accommodation by reassigning … In School Board of Nassau County, Fla. v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Runyon

    2 F. Supp. 2d 1062 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Apr 24, 1998

    Rush v. McDonald’s Corp., 966 F.2d 1104, 1109 (7th Cir.1992); see also Waldridge v. … Brown received only four reprimands (all for inadequate attendance). This is not a case like Oates v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Corchado Ex Rel. Corchado v. Board of Education

    86 F. Supp. 2d 168 · District Court, W.D. New York · Feb 18, 2000

    Briggs v. Board of Educ. of State of Conn., 882 F.2d 688, 693 (2d Cir.1989). See Board of Educ. v. … Board of Educ. v. Rowley, 458 U.S. 176, 206-07 , 102 S.Ct. 3034 , 73 L.Ed.2d 690 (1982).

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • United States v. Brown

    690 F. Supp. 1423 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 26, 1988

    I have before me defendant William Waddell Brown’s various presentencing motions attacking both the applicability and the validity of the sentencing guidelines that were promulgated by the United States Sentencing Commission … As of the late Nineteenth Century, Parole Boards began to tailor punishment to the offender and not merely the crime.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Brown v. United States

    271 F. Supp. 2d 225 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 9, 2003

    Gustave-Schmidt v. Chao, 226 F.Supp.2d 191 (D.D.C.2002). See Krooth & Altman v. North Am. Life Assur. … See Davis-Warren Auctioneers, J.V. v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Lonchyna v. Brown

    491 F. Supp. 1352 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jul 3, 1980

    United States v. Fallon, 407 F.2d 621, 623 (7th Cir. 1969); United States v. Holmes, 387 F.2d 781, 784 (7th Cir. 1968); see Hall v. United States, 437 F.2d 1063 (7th Cir. 1971). … Diliberti v. Brown, 583 F.2d 950, 952 (7th Cir. 1978) (“Assuming that the exhaustion requirement would be relaxed in the case of a ‘clear’ constitutional violation, plaintiff’s claim is less than clear.”)

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Smith v. O'Malley

    District Court, N.D. New York · Sep 23, 2024

    Brown ex rel. J.B. v. Colvin, No. 1:12-CV-1062, 2015 WL 1647094, *7 (W.D.N.Y. Apr. 14, 2015) (collecting cases). … See Charles v. Cnty. of Nassau, 116 F.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Martin v. Brown

    282 F. 717 · District Court, D. Colorado · Aug 7, 1922

    In Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Louisville & Nashville R. R., 250 Fed. at page 201, 162 C. C. … Brown & Bro. Mercantile Company, Frederick Sidney Brown, J. Sidney Brown, Carroll Teller Brown, Edward Newton Brown, and. William Knight Brown to strike are granted. All other motions are denied.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Leflore County

    150 F. Supp. 3d 753 · District Court, N.D. Mississippi · Dec 15, 2015

    The day after Brown’s letter to the Editor appeared in the Commomoealth, the Board voted to terminate Brown. Doc. # 51-43. The Board’s minutes do not provide a reason for Brown’s termination. 'Id. … This invitation to Brown to attend and present at the next Board meeting suggests that the Board, as of February 10, 2014, had no intent to terminate Brown.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Hogan v. Brown

    1 D.C. 75 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 15, 1802

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Tonkin

    1 D.C. 85 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 15, 1802

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. McIntosh

    265 F. 1011 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 3, 1920

    The interference originally involved three parties, Brown, Kritz, and McIntosh. Kritz, however, did not appeal from the decision of the Assistant Commissioner. … In the final paragraph of the Assistant Commissioner’s decision, he says: •‘McIntosh was the first to conceive the invention and his application was filed before Brown reduced the invention to practice, either actually or

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lumpkin v. Brown

    960 F. Supp. 1339 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Apr 22, 1997

    Brown, 20 F.3d 745, 747 (7th Cir.1994)). … Instead "[t]he ultimate issue at trial is whether 'age was a determining factor' in the employer's decision” (EEOC v. Century Broadcasting Corp., 957 F.2d 1446 , 1450 (7th Cir.1992), quoting Brown v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • IN RE DIDI GLOBAL INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION

    District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 2, 2025

    Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A. v. Sunny Merchandise Corp., 97 F. … Brown Prods., Ltd. v. Home Box Office, Inc., 26 F. Supp. 2d 606, 614 (S.D.N.Y. 1998)), and applying Lugosch).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Brown Ex Rel. Brown v. Commissioner of Social SEC.

    311 F. Supp. 2d 1151 · District Court, D. Kansas · Mar 18, 2004

    V. … Qualls v. Apfel, 206 F.3d 1368, 1371 (10th Cir.2000) (citing Casias v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 933 F.2d 799, 800 (10th Cir.1991)). 42 . Hall v. Apfel, 122 F.Supp.2d 959, 967 (N.D.Ill.2000); Lugo v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.