Case law

Brown v. Xerox Corp.

170 F. Supp. 3d 518 · District Court, W.D. New York · Mar 21, 2016

In Littlejohn v. … See Rojas v.

Brown v. Reardon

611 F. Supp. 302 · District Court, D. Kansas · Oct 21, 1983

Brown v. Chaffee, 612 F.2d 497, 502 (10th Cir.1979); Taylor v. Nichols, 558 F.2d 561, 568 (10th Cir.1977). … See Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2709 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972).

Gogek v. Brown University

729 F. Supp. 926 · District Court, D. Rhode Island · Feb 23, 1990

The complaint alleges that he is a physician who seeks board certification in psychiatry. … In 1986 he entered a one year program at Brown University Medical School to complete his residency in psychiatry and thereby qualify to take the test for board certification.

Thomas v. Brown

513 F. Supp. 2d 1124 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 21, 2006

See Sass v. California Board of Prison Terms, 461 F.3d 1123, 1126-27 (9th Cir.2006). DISCUSSION A. … See Sass, 461 F.3d at 1127-28 ; Board of Pardons v. Allen, 482 U.S. 369 , 107 S.Ct. 2415 , 96 L.Ed.2d 303 (1987); Greenholtz v. Inmates of Nebraska Penal & Corr.

Brown v. West Corp.

287 F.R.D. 494 · District Court, D. Nebraska · Nov 5, 2012

This matter is before the Court on the motion of plaintiff Rex Brown (“Brown”) to compel discovery (Filing No. 34). … Affirmative Action Plan Plaintiff claims that Craik v. Minnesota State University Board, 731 F.2d 465 (8th Cir.1984) “clearly holds that information regarding an employer’s Affirmative Action Plan is discoverable.”

Notinger v. Brown

2009 DNH 043 · District Court, D. New Hampshire · Mar 31, 2009

Notinger v . Brown 08-CV-005-SM 03/31/09 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Steven M . … Notinger, Trustee in Bankruptcy of David Deaver Brown and Simply Media, Inc., Plaintiff v.

Brown v. Green

781 F. Supp. 36 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 24, 1991

Brown as a result of the miscarriage which was, in itself, painful. *39 In Williams v. … Brown’s pregnancy may in itself be considered a physical harm that could place Ms. Brown in the zone of danger.

Grier v. Brown

230 F. Supp. 2d 1108 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 6, 2002

In Harris v. … See, e.g., Wyman v.

Employers Mutual Casualty Co. v. Loos Ex Rel. Loos

476 F. Supp. 2d 478 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 28, 2007

Brown v. Progressive Ins. Co. & Mountain laurel Assurance Co., 860 A.2d 493, 501 (Pa.Super.Ct.2004). “Bad faith claims are fact specific and depend on the conduct of the insurer vis a vis the insured.” Condio v. … Brown, 860 A.2d at 501 .

Brown v. Wharton

756 F. Supp. 223 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 21, 1990

Sturm v. Clark, 835 F.2d 1009, 1011 (3d Cir.1987). … Wisniewski v. Johns-Manville Corp., 759 F.2d 271 (3d Cir.1985). The plaintiff was married to William L. Brown on June 29, 1964 and remained married to him until his death on April 15, 1986. Complaint at ¶ 4.

Brown v. Humana Insurance

942 F. Supp. 2d 723 · District Court, W.D. Kentucky · Apr 30, 2013

See Nguyen v. … In Sista v.

Brown v. Smith

470 F. Supp. 131 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 24, 1979

Konigsberg v. Vincent (2d Cir. 1975) 526 F.2d 131 ; United States v. Rosenthal (2d Cir. 1972) 470 F.2d 837 . … The decisions in United States v. Rosenthal, supra, and United States ex rel. Konigsberg v. Vincent, supra, upon which respondent relies, do not support respondent’s position.

Brown v. Marsh

707 F. Supp. 21 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 9, 1989

In McKenzie v. Kennickell, 669 F.Supp. 529 (D.D.C.1987), and in Jurgens v. … Brown’s fee application is adequately supported; the Army’s opposition is not. See NAACP v.

Brown v. Parker

39 F. Supp. 895 · District Court, S.D. California · Jul 9, 1941

“(quoting from Cargill Co. v. … Elevator Co. v. Langer, supra.]

Rowen v. Brown

61 F. Supp. 858 · District Court, W.D. Michigan · Jun 20, 1945

South Chicago Coal & Dock Co. v. Bassett, 7 Cir., 104 F.2d 522 . … When the crew of a vessel is referred to, those persons are naturally and primarily meant who are on board her aiding in her navigation,. without reference to the nature of the arrangement under which they are on board, and

Johnson v. Brown

26 F. Supp. 2d 147 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 6, 1998

See Johnson v. … In Woodman v.

Brown v. Williams

820 F. Supp. 64 · District Court, W.D. New York · Apr 29, 1993

People v. Brown, 162 A.D.2d 1030 , 557 N.Y.S.2d 812 (4th Dept.1990). … People v.

United States v. Brown

257 F. Supp. 3d 330 · District Court, E.D. New York · May 26, 2017

In Johnson v. … .”); Thrower v.

Brown v. Strum

350 F. Supp. 2d 346 · District Court, D. Connecticut · Dec 22, 2004

Lombardi v. … In Tuck v.

United States v. Brown

224 F. 135 · District Court, W.D. Washington · Apr 21, 1915

Ed. 256 , Mugler v. Kansas, 123 U. S. 623 , 8 Sup. Ct. 273, 31 L. Ed. 205 , Leisey v. Hardin, 135 U. S. 100 , 10 Sup. Ct. 681, 34 L. Ed. 128 , and Austin v. Tenn., 179 U. S. 343 , 21 Sup. Ct. 132, 45 L Ed. 224. … In Mugler v. Kansas, a prohibition statute, so called, was held unconstitutional. In Leisey v.