Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersFBCA

323 results

0.54s

  • Schulman v. California State Water Resources Control Board (In Re Lazar)

    96 Daily Journal DAR 12633 · United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · Sep 3, 1996

    This procedure clearly qualifies as timely adjudication within the meaning of § 1334(e)(2). 2. … Hans clearly remains good law. B.

    Cited 37 timesPublished
  • In Re Continental Coin Corp.

    380 B.R. 1 · United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · Dec 11, 2007

    A THEORY OF TRUSTEE LIABILITY .4 II.CASELAW ON THE ISSUE OF IMMUNITY FOR TRUSTEES. • A. The Position of Trustee Qualifies for Immunity. • B. … The terms immunity, absolute immunity, qualified immunity, qualified judicial immunity, quasi-judicial immunity, derived immunity, and judicial immunity sure use interchangeably in this memorandum. 9 . Theresa J.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • W.J.P. Properties v. Resolution Trust Corp. (In Re W.J.P. Properties)

    149 B.R. 604 · United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · Dec 18, 1992

    FIRREA established administrative procedures for adjudicating claims asserted against RTC as receiver of a failed thrift institution. Circle Indus. v. City Fed. Sav. … Also, the Court stated that the specific preclusive language of FISA is not qualified or superseded by the general provisions governing bankruptcy proceedings. Id.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Federal National Mortgage Ass'n v. County of Orange (In Re County of Orange)

    183 B.R. 609 · United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · May 26, 1995

    Sovereign immunity has been waived. The County contends that the doctrine of sovereign immunity prohibits FNMA from setting off. … doctrine of governmental immunity does not apply.”

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Association of Retired Employees v. City of Stockton (In re City of Stockton)

    478 B.R. 8 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · Aug 6, 2012

    Second, sovereign immunity is voluntarily abrogated to the extent provided in § 106. … VI Having established that there will be no TRO, no injunction, and no relief from the automatic stay, as well as having established that the claims-adjudication procedure within the collective chapter 9 case is adequate

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • In Re Rogers

    222 B.R. 348 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · Jun 18, 1998

    Clearly, the annuity is not a self-employed retirement plan or a qualifying IRA under (a)(3). Nor is it a qualified profit-sharing plan under (a)(2). … Another hint lies in the hierarchy or priority of exemption established by the legislature.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • In Re Rollins

    175 B.R. 69 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · Sep 6, 1994

    Standing of the United States Trustee The United States Trustee is charged with establishing, maintaining, and supervising a panel of private trustees who are eligible to serve as chapter 7 trustees. 28 U.S.C. § 586 (a)(1 … If a trustee incurs a contract or tort liability to someone other than the debtor or a creditor of the estate, he is entitled to a qualified judicial immunity.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • In Re Spencer

    123 B.R. 858 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · Jan 18, 1991

    Clearly, the IRS could obtain the same information through some other, albeit more cumbersome, means. … The IRS has clearly established that there is a legitimate purpose for the investigation and that the information sought is relevant to that purpose.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • In Re Lazar

    207 B.R. 668 · United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · Apr 1, 1997

    Furthermore, Congress clearly decided which fines and penalties qualify as administrative expenses. Congress limited this category to fines arising from postpetition taxes. … In that case the district court reversed a bankruptcy court holding that some $560,000 in penalties assessed postpetition did not qualify as administrative expenses, because the stipulated facts failed to distinguish clearly

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • In Re Andreotti

    16 B.R. 28 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · Oct 23, 1981

    The debtor, on the other hand, asserts that even if he had not qualified for these exemptions at the time of the filing of the involuntary petition, he had qualified for these exemptions on the date that relief was ordered … In this case, debtor was clearly head of a family before the separation agreement and his taking of a separate abode. But for the agreement and his physical absence, no other changes occurred.

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • In Re Pacific Rollforming, LLC

    415 B.R. 750 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · Sep 30, 2009

    Dersovitz’s contention as to a December assignment clearly conflicts with his sworn Declaration filed May 15, 2009. … Even if Dersovitz were a qualified petitioner, the evidence established that abstention is appropriate in this case.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Gumport v. Interstate Commerce Commission (In re Transcon Lines)

    178 B.R. 228 · United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · Feb 1, 1995

    may not so qualify. … It reasoned that this narrow reading of “organization” is more consistent with its previously announced principle that “waivers of sovereign immunity, as EAJA is, are to be construed narrowly and in favor of the sovereign

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • In re City of Stockton

    526 B.R. 35 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · Feb 27, 2015

    The PERL § 20574 termination lien qualifies as a “statutory lien” under the Bankruptcy Code. … Sovereign immunity is abrogated with respect to § 545. 11 U.S.C. § 106 (a)(1).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • In Re Pacific Gas & Electric Co.

    273 B.R. 795 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · Feb 7, 2002

    Sovereign Immunity Implications 1. … The potential harm from antitrust violations, for example, might not be imminent and clearly identifiable, but the court does not believe Congress intended to eviscerate all *807 antitrust laws for debtors in bankruptcy (

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Roberts v. Harris (In Re Harris)

    101 B.R. 210 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · May 31, 1989

    California law has consistently and unequivocally recognized that although a trustor may create a valid trust naming himself as beneficiary, the assets in the trust are not immune from the claims of creditors. … The Harris' clearly qualify as "owners” under this section. 3 . § 704.710.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • In Re Marshall

    300 B.R. 507 · United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · Oct 9, 2003

    The 1800 Act specified ten qualifying acts of bankruptcy, which largely mirrored those in the English statutes. See 1800 Act, § 1. The 1841 Act reduced to five the qualifying acts of bankruptcy. See 1841 Act, § 1. … state sovereign immunity) and case law thereunder.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • In Re McCullers

    451 B.R. 498 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · Jun 8, 2011

    Read together, § 541(a) and (b) establish a fixed point in time at which parties and the bankruptcy court can evaluate what assets are included or excluded from property of the estate. … Section 541(a) clearly establishes this point as the commencement of the case.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • In Re Mooney

    248 B.R. 391 · United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · May 10, 2000

    The limitation on IRAs under CCP § 704.115 is clearly set forth in subdivision (e). … A 401(K) plan is an ERISA qualified plan established by an employer. 13 . See n. 9, supra.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • In re CFB Liquidating Corp.

    576 B.R. 610 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · Aug 25, 2017

    Maine: First, a party’s later position must be clearly inconsistent with its earlier position. … This is clearly an inconsistent position—and an inaccurate one—as it pertains to the coverage issues never having been raised- or considered here.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Williams v. United Investment Corp. (In Re Williams)

    124 B.R. 311 · United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · Feb 15, 1991

    The test is not whether the Debtor qualifies as a BFP under Section 544 and 549, but rather whether the trustee does. … The requisite knowledge and intent may be difficult to establish in many cases.

    Cited 30 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.